CNN suddenly trying to look credible, and BLM suddenly scrubbing it's communist rhetoric from its site... Whats going on, is the supreme court pick sending them into a panic?
Rule 13: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.
This one has them short circuiting. Too many targets to focus on. Too many loose ends to tie up. They can't focus on anything. Good morning. Sunday morning.
So interesting that Trump single handedly stopped the BLM riots. If you think about it, before he started talking about Law and Order, and forcing Slow Biden to either accept his talking point, they were winning. They strong armed America, and every one, every site and news station had to cower or be called a racist. Trump took a stand, people followed his lead, and instead of being called anti-black, we were called pro peace. He's very good at changing the narrative and not allowing anyone to dictate his image.
They got freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it down, but they didn't agree on the first part, "pick the target", and picked too many.
They also didn't properly calculate the populace's beliefs because they were skewed by progressive social media. So when they tried to 'polarize it' around a point, so that 40% of people would fall on one side and 60% would fall on yours, they picked the centerpoint wrong and we got the 60% while they got the 40.
They should have focused on corona and the foodlines. They then jump on then Ahmaud Arbery case but then it lost steam so they went back to corona. Then Floyd, they half wanted to keep talking about corona, half wanted to push blm. Then the riot happen and they wanted to push that too. Commies want to keep people in fear, American don't take threats kindly.
What little covid credibility is left is gonna be blown all to hell when democrat screaming banshees descend on the Capitol and try to disrupt the nomination hearings and senate vote. No social distancing. Few masks. Chanting,?yelling, other “super spreader” activities. Media and Dems will then try to spin a new narrative lie what, what, what, we never said this was a problem.
well, if anything this shows they're getting scared even of creating false narratives. a patriotic SCOTUS might have ramifications that we can't even foresee atm.
They showed just how scared they were when they suddenly dragged Joe Hiden out of the basement to denounce "violence on all sides", floated the USPS conspiracy theory, and had The Atlantic push out the supermarket tabloid smear articles about dead soldiers. An article so absurd only the unhinged Democratic base believed it. From here on out the Dems have entered violent hysteria. They are detached from reality and are pushing the limits on what qualifies as sedition.
He’s had the list done before he was even nominated by the republicans to be president!!!! Good to see CNN is finally calling Biden out on his shit! Fuck his lies!
getting RGB out of their network may be a bigger win than we realize. hillary clinton picked her out for bill to nominate. RGB made a disaster out of the SC. without her, would we even have "activist judges" ruining the country?
The problem is once people lose faith, they do not magically gain it back; they see all attempts to pull them back in as a farse meant only for that purpose.
Some of the most stringent atheists are those raised religious who felt betrayed by the dogma or how they were raised.
The media and political establishment is creating a society of people who will never trust either again so long as they live.
If you gave me a button and said pushing it would wipe out all media and politics forever, but I'd have to reap the consequences of life without both, I'd slap my dick on that button in a second.
Some of the most stringent atheists are those raised religious who felt betrayed by the dogma or how they were raised.
Or those who have tragically lost loved ones and thought God should have saved them. God gave up his only Son, letting enemies kill Him on a cross. We cannot fathom the reasons why, but just because we have lost someone doesn't mean God has forgotten or abandoned them. IMO, Matthew 10:29 says it best:
We aren't allowed to criticize blacks, latinos, women, gays, trannies, the list goes on. So it seems your implication there isn't quite as effective as you think it is.
Each state gets 3 votes. One for each state in the House and each Senator.
The contingent election procedure, along with the other parts of the presidential election process, was first established in Article Two, Section 1, Clause 3 of the United States Constitution, and then modified by the 12th Amendment in 1804. During a contingent election, each House state delegation casts one en bloc vote to determine the president, rather than a vote for each representative. Senators instead cast votes individually for vice president.
Top article in The Atlantic today is about the long legal battle coming after the election. They’re trying to get everyone nice and used to the idea that the election will not be settled in November.
They're in panic, their last hope is to try and report a few minor negative Biden things to try and convince the general public that they're not biased.
Judging by the absolute shitstorm going on in FB and Twitter, I think the Dems realized the nagging wife/angry GF/crazy cat lady/handmaid larpers thing is a bad look and exactly the kind of social messaging that didn't work with Hillary. They can't go against that "feminist agenda" narrative, they are trying their best to shore up a couple of points before the next poll. So all of a sudden we have a "what media bias?" and "what trained marxists?" thing going on. Time to ask your normie friends how they think the messaging could be so consistent, and then so consistently pulled back? Do they still believe there is no media/BLM/Dem collusion?
I got a few to at least question it with 'breaking news' and it was some random tweet from 4 days earlier. I would then deconstructed the top article for that day. They all follow predictable patterns. I would show what was left out and ask 'gee why did they leave that part out?' or 'oh look the smear one side downplay the importance of the other for the same act'. I also started calling 'timeout on that lets see what happens in 2 days'. Usually by that time the story was wildly different and we could talk about the changes. The downside is this method takes time and someone at least willing to listen. That never works on the internet. You can not show them facts. You show them they are being lied to. Constantly.
Everything that ends up in the news is fake. Almost all of it. Someone had to decide what was said. Put together a crew to write it, read it. film it, present it, artwork the transitions, edit, etc etc etc. It is a production company. They have it down so they can do it semi quickly. If they have a gap of 10 mins in the middle of a show grab one of the mad-lib news wire puff pieces and use that. Usually it is 80% there and can be quickly massaged into the local format. Fake.
CNN suddenly trying to look credible, and BLM suddenly scrubbing it's communist rhetoric from its site... Whats going on, is the supreme court pick sending them into a panic?
It's got them thrown off big time. Corona virus was supposed to carry them to November.
This one has them short circuiting. Too many targets to focus on. Too many loose ends to tie up. They can't focus on anything. Good morning. Sunday morning.
Mods should post a required reading section.
Reccomend: Art of the Deal Think Big Constituon Rules for Radicals Communist Manifesto
Any others pedes?
Here you go! Best of all it's FREEEEEEEEEEEE!!!
https://chisineu.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/saul-alinsky-rules-for-radicals-1989.pdf
What the hell did she mean by that?
She has Groundhogzeimers.
Micro-stroke.
She was trying (and failing) to be playfully coy. Oh my- we can't tell you our plan- let me change the subject.
So interesting that Trump single handedly stopped the BLM riots. If you think about it, before he started talking about Law and Order, and forcing Slow Biden to either accept his talking point, they were winning. They strong armed America, and every one, every site and news station had to cower or be called a racist. Trump took a stand, people followed his lead, and instead of being called anti-black, we were called pro peace. He's very good at changing the narrative and not allowing anyone to dictate his image.
They got freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it down, but they didn't agree on the first part, "pick the target", and picked too many.
They also didn't properly calculate the populace's beliefs because they were skewed by progressive social media. So when they tried to 'polarize it' around a point, so that 40% of people would fall on one side and 60% would fall on yours, they picked the centerpoint wrong and we got the 60% while they got the 40.
They should have focused on corona and the foodlines. They then jump on then Ahmaud Arbery case but then it lost steam so they went back to corona. Then Floyd, they half wanted to keep talking about corona, half wanted to push blm. Then the riot happen and they wanted to push that too. Commies want to keep people in fear, American don't take threats kindly.
What little covid credibility is left is gonna be blown all to hell when democrat screaming banshees descend on the Capitol and try to disrupt the nomination hearings and senate vote. No social distancing. Few masks. Chanting,?yelling, other “super spreader” activities. Media and Dems will then try to spin a new narrative lie what, what, what, we never said this was a problem.
well, if anything this shows they're getting scared even of creating false narratives. a patriotic SCOTUS might have ramifications that we can't even foresee atm.
They showed just how scared they were when they suddenly dragged Joe Hiden out of the basement to denounce "violence on all sides", floated the USPS conspiracy theory, and had The Atlantic push out the supermarket tabloid smear articles about dead soldiers. An article so absurd only the unhinged Democratic base believed it. From here on out the Dems have entered violent hysteria. They are detached from reality and are pushing the limits on what qualifies as sedition.
The timeline has changed, there’s hope. The ol bitch actually did it.
He’s had the list done before he was even nominated by the republicans to be president!!!! Good to see CNN is finally calling Biden out on his shit! Fuck his lies!
after 99 lies and misrepresentations, they have to sprinkle in 1 actual news story, for credibility
Dr. Samuel Beckett still putting right what once went wrong...
getting RGB out of their network may be a bigger win than we realize. hillary clinton picked her out for bill to nominate. RGB made a disaster out of the SC. without her, would we even have "activist judges" ruining the country?
Roy G. Biv
virus and the riots/BLM/Antifa. They started too early, but fuck, hopefully that is a lesson they dont learn for 2024
And just like that, Democrats forgot about coronavirus
Their internal polling must indicate that they need to throw voters a bone if they have a chance of winning.
And yes I also mean CNN because they're an arm of the Democrat party.
The problem is once people lose faith, they do not magically gain it back; they see all attempts to pull them back in as a farse meant only for that purpose.
Some of the most stringent atheists are those raised religious who felt betrayed by the dogma or how they were raised.
The media and political establishment is creating a society of people who will never trust either again so long as they live.
This is exactly what we need.
I'm already there.
If you gave me a button and said pushing it would wipe out all media and politics forever, but I'd have to reap the consequences of life without both, I'd slap my dick on that button in a second.
Or those who have tragically lost loved ones and thought God should have saved them. God gave up his only Son, letting enemies kill Him on a cross. We cannot fathom the reasons why, but just because we have lost someone doesn't mean God has forgotten or abandoned them. IMO, Matthew 10:29 says it best:
Οὐχὶ δύο στρουθία πωλεῖται ἀσσαρίου; καὶ οὐ ἓν ἐξ αὐτῶν πεσεῖται ἐπὶ τὴν γῆν ἄνευ ὑμῶν Πατρὸς.
"What is the price of two sparrows—one copper coin? But not a single sparrow can fall to the ground without your Father knowing it."
Honestly I think its the other way around, the MSM is the democrats handlers.
There is a group that owns both and we aren't allowed to criticize them
We aren't allowed to criticize blacks, latinos, women, gays, trannies, the list goes on. So it seems your implication there isn't quite as effective as you think it is.
the no Voltaire club
No, they both some secret masters they report to. They’re just different arms of the same thing.
I don't see a way to just rid ourselves of them voting doesn't seem to work, it's like were stuck with them forever.
If it goes to the House, each state gets
2 votes3 votes. If this happens, Trump wins like 30 of the states (which is a Trump victory).Each state gets 3 votes. One for each state in the House and each Senator.
Top article in The Atlantic today is about the long legal battle coming after the election. They’re trying to get everyone nice and used to the idea that the election will not be settled in November.
They're in panic, their last hope is to try and report a few minor negative Biden things to try and convince the general public that they're not biased.
Judging by the absolute shitstorm going on in FB and Twitter, I think the Dems realized the nagging wife/angry GF/crazy cat lady/handmaid larpers thing is a bad look and exactly the kind of social messaging that didn't work with Hillary. They can't go against that "feminist agenda" narrative, they are trying their best to shore up a couple of points before the next poll. So all of a sudden we have a "what media bias?" and "what trained marxists?" thing going on. Time to ask your normie friends how they think the messaging could be so consistent, and then so consistently pulled back? Do they still believe there is no media/BLM/Dem collusion?
I got a few to at least question it with 'breaking news' and it was some random tweet from 4 days earlier. I would then deconstructed the top article for that day. They all follow predictable patterns. I would show what was left out and ask 'gee why did they leave that part out?' or 'oh look the smear one side downplay the importance of the other for the same act'. I also started calling 'timeout on that lets see what happens in 2 days'. Usually by that time the story was wildly different and we could talk about the changes. The downside is this method takes time and someone at least willing to listen. That never works on the internet. You can not show them facts. You show them they are being lied to. Constantly.
Everything that ends up in the news is fake. Almost all of it. Someone had to decide what was said. Put together a crew to write it, read it. film it, present it, artwork the transitions, edit, etc etc etc. It is a production company. They have it down so they can do it semi quickly. If they have a gap of 10 mins in the middle of a show grab one of the mad-lib news wire puff pieces and use that. Usually it is 80% there and can be quickly massaged into the local format. Fake.