5957
So...What Day Works for You? (media.patriots.win)
posted ago by Isaiah53 ago by Isaiah53 +5957 / -0
Comments (297)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
201
goodbeerbetterviews2 201 points ago +203 / -2

They don't understand that they will be picked off from rooftops, tree lines, and the shadows. Their food supply is gone. Their water will be shut off. Their power grids are outside the city. Do you really want this you fuckers? Do you want to see how quickly gang lords rise to power in your shitty cities? Because once starvation sets in we will simply block your way out and force you back in. Normal citizens will turn against you. You are alone once your boys start turning into pink mist around you.

164
MMXX 164 points ago +164 / -0

The Seattle CHOP garden was the perfect example of delusional ultra-liberal city dwellers thinking that they're even remotely capable of self sufficiency.

106
WhiteLash 106 points ago +106 / -0

Lmfao. A dude on LSD destroyed the garden in like 2 days if I recall correctly.

64
840726 64 points ago +64 / -0

It was destroyed in minutes lol. The "garden" was about 200 square feet.

105
MMXX 105 points ago +105 / -0

Are you ready for the punchline? The guy who started the CHOP garden has a Masters degree in "Sustainability in the Urban Environment": https://www.thestranger.com/slog/2020/06/12/43897621/meet-the-farmer-behind-chazs-vegetable-gardens

18
ChrisTheSoberITGuy 18 points ago +18 / -0

And planted on top of cardboard with a little soil on top. Didn't even cut through the cardboard

2
MudDog 2 points ago +2 / -0

They had to save room for the supply gliders to land

16
CrackaJack 16 points ago +16 / -0

Also, the garden was like 10sq ft, and have like 6 plants in it.

9
ObjectiveReality 9 points ago +9 / -0

'Planted' in two inches of loose soil on top of cardboard... Once they realized that you have to transplant them out of their planters.

All in a Seattle climate I'll remind

11
MouthAgapeForBLMJizz 11 points ago +11 / -0

Yes! Lmao I remember. Does anyone have the pics of it? It was so embarrassingly bad and shitty looking 😂

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
8
Friendly_B 8 points ago +8 / -0

"garden"

16
CovefeefevoC 16 points ago +16 / -0

There is a book titled "See you in 100 years" that catalogues and documents what are likely left leaning libs trying to survive on their own as though it was the late 1800's. Fascinating insight into what it takes. They give it their all and end up succeeding - but likely became less "lib" because of it. IMO great book, not because of the prose but because of the revelations within it. the TLDR is self sustaining without modern power functionally takes all your time up. You have to worry about how many calories you are burning vs. how many you are planting - especially when just starting out.

Also gender/sex differences DO matter- significantly - and if you ignore them, you die.

6
Crockett 6 points ago +6 / -0

They give it their all and end up succeeding - but likely became less "lib" because of it.

Imagine spending years of blood, sweat, and tears, earning the experience required to finally achieve and maintain a sustainable living for your family from the earth itself....then one day an unemployed talentless political science major shows up and claims that you're morally obligated to feed and shelter him as well, because you have the means. (And that also, you should probably stop raising chickens because meat is murder).

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
12
CovefeefevoC 12 points ago +12 / -0

Sure. In the book they decide to change "roles" for the day, The guy would take care of the toddler and the house work while the wife would take care of the fields. She simply did not have the physical ability to get enough of the work done by the time it would have needed to have been done for them to maintain their, at the time, farm. Essentially the reality of the physical differences between men and women came to the forefront when your life depends on the food you are planting and caring for today determines if you will survive the winter.

Men are stronger, - they have larger lung capacity than women, men can simply do "more work" than women in the same amount of time (physical). This isn't a mystery. If SOMEONE has to watch the kid and keep to the stove and the house - who should do it, the man, or the woman if the other job is to work in the fields?

There is also some interesting concepts of the equation of Calories burned to generate future calories to burn. If you are running at a deficit you are in trouble and may even be able to spot the trouble months out. But also taking into account during winter months you will be more sedentary so will not have to necessarily worry -as much - about daily calories available. Do you have a reserve? etc.

The perspective of food scarcity also puts into perspective how special "Feasts" were back in the day - Modern day has completely erased the importance of a feast back in the day because we have lost the perspective of how important food is and how difficult (without modern power) it is to develop/cultivate - Further - that's not accounting for famine or bad crops.

It's a really interesting book for this kind of practical data.

2
PatriotsandBacon 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just look at the suicide rates of those ignoring them now...

1
braveContrarian 1 point ago +2 / -1

lets have a 100% female military. what could possibly go wrong if they all died?

6
stratocaster_patriot 6 points ago +6 / -0

And that CHOP garden was for black and indigenous only. Yeah, that seemed about their speed. Nice comorbidity garden lol.

6
Modus_Pwninz 6 points ago +6 / -0

They bought potted herb plants from local stores and then threw them on the ground in some dirt.

Lmao, enjoy your herb sandwich, minus bread. Herbs are a seasoning not a food you fucktards!

1
zooty 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hey, when you're eating only vegetables, I reckon seasoning becomes really important.

2
SilverStarv5 2 points ago +2 / -0

especially salt

6
LesboPregnancyScare 6 points ago +6 / -0

Also Raz, the unelected ruler of CHAZ, because he had guns and a posse. Rule of might, a hardly progressive utopia.

24
Dckman 24 points ago +25 / -1

They really don't get it.

13
goodbeerbetterviews2 13 points ago +14 / -1

They have to come to us. And we can control all vital supply lines coming in.

9
grndmrshlgando 9 points ago +9 / -0

they were killed by their own stupidity. the bullets only helped them along.

24
Konsaki 24 points ago +25 / -1

How to siege a city via 2 objectives:

  • Crash/disable 18wheelers in a way to block the main highways in and out of the city, preferably over any major bridges or roads that don't have frontage streets. Use a handful of snipers to discourage anyone trying to clear the obstruction.

  • Damage/destroy/disable the power substations distributing power to the city from the nearby power source. This can also be accomplished by using a sniper to shoot/sever the high voltage cables on the high current power lines leading to/from the power source and substations.

The effect is that the city now has vastly reduced flow of food/supplies into the city and any supplies that are in the city will spoil sooner due to lack of refrigeration. Water supply also might be affected, depending on location of source and how it's powered, but as a human can survive without food for months but only days without water, it's advisable to leave the water supply alone.

8
Shezestriakis 8 points ago +8 / -0

Sorry, but war is war. Shut down the water too.

9
Postal 9 points ago +9 / -0

The people of Seattle will just get/loot it from the grocery stooooohhhhhh, right, they forced them all out.

1
zooty 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, they say it rains 9 months of the year in Seattle...

2
BeefyBelisarius 2 points ago +2 / -0

Already done. The water mains won't be able to stay at pressure when the power's shut off.

19
NewVoatAccountName 19 points ago +20 / -1

The gang lords wouldn't even have much of a chance to rise to power, since the truckers would abandon the lawless cities and the highways could be easily cut off far from the cities, leaving them all stranded in a desolate hellscape. If most cities instantly switched to a perfect system of rationing food, they'd still be starving in a week or two. If people panicked and hoarded food, the shelves would be barren on that first day.

Meanwhile, all the farmers, the hunters, the ex-military, and the preppers would be fully stocked and ready for MONTHS in advance, with the farmers and hunters being able to easily replenish their stocks by either living off the land or raising more crops/animals.

21
MouthAgapeForBLMJizz 21 points ago +24 / -3

This very well may be true but conservatives have absolutely ZERO organization as of right now. None. Conservatives need organization.

Edit —> The blm/ Antifa/ commies have the backings of billionaires, the backing of ELITE level democrats, the backing of commie sympathizer Mayors and Governors. The backing of corrupt and George Soros paid DA’s and prosecutors... and violent foreign communist organizations (ccp).

Yes. In a one v one battle, Or a “okay commies line up on this side of the valley and conservatives line up on this side of the valley” patriots would prevail.

But that’s not how it would go down nor is that how it’s currently going down. All you guys almost wishing for a civil war need to understand this isn’t game of thrones. This isn’t Call of Duty. Just because we; on average; are more stout; stronger and more Alpha etc doesn’t really mean shit.

11
justsomefuckingdude 11 points ago +11 / -0

Conservatives need organization.

That's a good way to see just how quickly the feds can move when they feel like it. The system has been designed to prevent patriotic Americans from organizing. All the inefficiency and inability to do anything about the leftist terrorists has nothing to do with some lack of capability on the part of the feds, they simply don't want to stop it.

9
Isaiah53 [S] 9 points ago +9 / -0

It actually works to our advantage.

They now have no groups to infiltrate or attack.

2
MuadDon 2 points ago +5 / -3

Suicidal levels of hubris here. Unless the farmers and hunters and ex-military and preppers are prepared to organize to defeat the communist states of america and its world-class military AND take its place AND become or assign the first leadership to restore the Constitution, then civil war will just end in communistic totalitarianism or a primitive period of preppers living out their days alone in the woods waiting for the Chinese invasion and settlement forces to arrive.

6
NewVoatAccountName 6 points ago +6 / -0

thinking that the US military would accept a Communist takeover
thinking that the military wouldn't kick the Commies out on Day 1 of a hostile coup attempt
thinking that most of the troops wouldn't either go AWOL or quietly rebel from within
thinking that America's allies would sit back and do nothing to help remove the violent Commies trying to overthrow the American government

-1
MuadDon -1 points ago +1 / -2

Like I said, suicidal levels of hubris. If communism ever takes hold here, it'll be from within and done insidiously, and the population will go with it. Look at how fast it worked on Venezuela. Many in extremely important positions all over our land already agree, including military leadership. Things are far worse than you think. Our only chance is winning the info war.

18
deleted 18 points ago +20 / -2
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0