153
Comments (12)
sorted by:
16
Italians_Invented_2A 16 points ago +17 / -1

I agree absolutely.

A white woman who adopted foreign black children is a cultural Marxist.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +2 / -3
-3
deleted -3 points ago +1 / -4
15
8
Italians_Invented_2A 8 points ago +8 / -0

Thank you for this great article.

Francis routinely denounces every effort to enforce any democratically enacted immigration law. His appointees have literally demonized politicians such as Matteo Salvini, comparing him to the “Antichrist” for his stance opposing the mass influx of Muslims into Europe.

The Pope is one of the most dangerous leftist fanatic, hellbent in destroying western civilization and Christianity. It's one of the biggest problems for Italian politics and one of the main reason Italy doesn't elect its own Trump.

I would not go anywhere near a judge who considers himself Catholic.

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
2
Italians_Invented_2A 2 points ago +2 / -0

But do we know where any of these that you mentioned stand on any issue?

Only thing I found was Lagoa opposing voting rights for felons, which is a great thing, but I'd like to know more about here.

I hate the fact that Trump is picking a woman. We're surrendering to those who attacked Kav.

workplace discrimination which 99% of americans would agree should protect trannies and gays from being fired only because they are gay or trans.

No, the majority of Americans wouldn't agree. First because antidiscrimination laws are a violation of freedom (like explained by Milton Friedman). Second because homos and freaks should keep it to themselves and not shove it down people's throats. Thanks to Gorsuch homos will be able to request the employer to install a giant dildo on their chair and sue for discrimination if they can't ride it during working hours.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
5
Comanche_Moon 5 points ago +5 / -0

The pope is compromised and she will blindly follow the pope.

4
MedPede 4 points ago +4 / -0

"Barrett co-authored a scholarly legal article with John H. Garvey, now the President of the Catholic University of America. They stated their conclusion quite bluntly:

[W]e believe that Catholic judges (if they are faithful to the teaching of their church) are morally precluded from enforcing the death penalty. This means that they can neither themselves sentence criminals to death nor enforce jury recommendations of death."

As the Son of God, Jesus could have easily saved Himself from death. He could have saved the penitent thief next to Him. Instead, He chose to say "On this day you will be with me in Paradise."

Here's a good interpretation of what that means, imo:

LUKE xxiii.42, 43. "And he said unto Jesus, Lord, remember me when thou comest into thy kingdom. And Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto thee, To-day shalt thou be with me in paradise.

The story of the penitent thief is a most beautiful and affecting one. Christians' hearts, in all times, have clung to it for comfort, not only for themselves, but for those whom they loved. Indeed, some people think that we are likely to be too fond of the story. They have been afraid lest people should build too much on it; lest they should fancy that it gives them licence to sin, and lead bad lives, all their days, provided only they repent at last; lest it should countenance too much what is called a death-bed repentance.

Now, God forbid that I should try to narrow Christ's Gospel. Who am I, to settle who shall be saved, and who shall not? When the disciples asked the Lord Jesus, 'Are there few that be saved?' he would not tell them. And what Christ did not choose to tell, I am not likely to know.

But I must say openly, that I cannot see what the story of the penitent thief has to do with a death-bed repentance; and for this plain reason, that the penitent thief did not die in his bed.

On the contrary, he received the due reward of his deeds. He was crucified; publicly executed, by the most shameful, painful, and lingering torture; and confessed that it was no more than he deserved."

Luke 23: 40-43

Now one of the criminals hanging there reviled Jesus, saying, “Are you not the Messiah? Save yourself and us.”

The other, however, rebuking him, said in reply, “Have you no fear of God, for you are subject to the same condemnation? And indeed, we have been condemned justly, for the sentence we received corresponds to our crimes, but this man has done nothing criminal.” Then he said, “Jesus, remember me when you come into your kingdom.”

He replied to him, “Amen, I say to you, today you will be with me in Paradise.”

Barrett should trust Jesus' own words more than those of the Pope or the politically left Church. If she had any sense of recent history (over the last 40-50 years) she would realize that the US Conference of Catholic Bishops and the Vatican have not seen eye to eye on many things. That should have been a red flag for her.

I hope President Trump doesn't choose Barrett.

..

2
deleted 2 points ago +4 / -2
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0