5212
Comments (227)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
oldskoolwargamer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah I tend to agree but if Mitch sees some value in letting vulnerable Rs avoid this vote until after the election I'm OK with that.

I am in favor of any tactic that Mitch comes up with at this point, we need this seat badly.

Election is a coin toss at this point, don't see how anyone looking at it rationally cannot come to that conclusion. Clearly need to have a Trump appointee fill this seat at any cost.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0