I'm both ways on this. I'm with the employees who feel being forced to wear gay shit is against their rights. Totally with that.
But Kroger's explanation and reasoning and claim it has nothing to do with faggotry also makes sense. However, Kroger's people should have been smart enough to say "hey, a rainbow heart is basically gay acceptance shit. maybe go with something else?"
I'm both ways on this. I'm with the employees who feel being forced to wear gay shit is against their rights. Totally with that.
But Kroger's explanation and reasoning and claim it has nothing to do with faggotry also makes sense. However, Kroger's people should have been smart enough to say "hey, a rainbow heart is basically gay acceptance shit. maybe go with something else?"