I would take a slight unknown but someone that is firm on the laws as they are written instead of legislating from the bench. Compare that to a woman that was passed over last time and has shown herself to be not exactly all that firm on matters of constitutional protections such as her rulings on the lockdowns.
Removing abortion isn't worth losing out on everything else, especially when Amy has already said she won't go against the pope on anything. That is not ok for a supreme court justice.
So you DON'T want the end of Roe?
No guarantees she’d go there.
Are you saying Lagoa won't be for ending it?
I'm saying her position on abortion is not well known.
I would take a slight unknown but someone that is firm on the laws as they are written instead of legislating from the bench. Compare that to a woman that was passed over last time and has shown herself to be not exactly all that firm on matters of constitutional protections such as her rulings on the lockdowns.
Removing abortion isn't worth losing out on everything else, especially when Amy has already said she won't go against the pope on anything. That is not ok for a supreme court justice.