3939 () posted 206 days ago by Jack_MemeHoff2 206 days ago by Jack_MemeHoff2 +3939 / -0 165 comments share 165 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (165) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 4 ▼ – DrinkMoreWater 4 points 206 days ago +4 / -0 It was considered against decorum because judges were supposed to appear impartial. If it was a regular court and the judge was on record saying things about the defendant or plaintiff, they would probably recuse themselves. permalink save report block reply
It was considered against decorum because judges were supposed to appear impartial. If it was a regular court and the judge was on record saying things about the defendant or plaintiff, they would probably recuse themselves.