4934
Comments (468)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
15
DavidIcke 15 points ago +24 / -9

The fact is if he nominates a woman like Amy Barrett, it takes the wind out of their sails.

I like the idea of getting a conservative judge in their as quick as possible, if the judge being a woman makes that easier, then so be it. We're using their identity politics bullshit against them. We can't be purists with only 43 days left until the election.

25
DrAugustBalls 25 points ago +27 / -2

Don’t be naive. She’s a heterosexual, devoutly religious, (EDIT:) pro-life mother.

In this current sociopolitical climate, she represents everything they hate. She’s not going to get a free pass from the smears just because she’s a woman.

8
America1stAndOnly 8 points ago +10 / -2

devoutly religious, pro-choice mother.

Pick 1 and only 1.

12
Angelpuncher 12 points ago +12 / -0

She's pro-life. He misspoke.

2
DavidIcke 2 points ago +5 / -3

It's not about her getting a free pass. It's about taking the wind out of their sales, and also exposing them as hypocrites. It's a win-win situation. That ends in us getting a hardcore conservative on the bench.

5
snoopy3210 5 points ago +6 / -1

Also it works because she proves you can have many children and become a Justice on the Supreme court.

4
DrAugustBalls 4 points ago +5 / -1

I’m not following the logic.

If you think these rabid lunatics are going to feel any less emboldened or go any easier on a nominee just because it’s a woman, then you’re badly underestimating them. These people have no standards and no boundaries. Nothing is off limits. A female nominee will not receive any special treatment. Just because they won’t accuse her of rape doesn’t mean they won’t cook up some other insane nonsense.

3
Miasmo 3 points ago +3 / -0

No question about it, they will assassinate her character.

1
tom_of_rj_fame 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well bring it on Kamala! There is nothing like being a bully bitch and beating down on a unable to respond in kind witness - to draw both sympathy and hate from the observers.

1
grenades_and_ham 1 point ago +1 / -0

Everything is on the table when it comes to Commies, wouldn't surprise me at all if they drag her adopted kids out front and center.

-2
Cacciali_Via -2 points ago +1 / -3

In what way is she hard-core? Pro life isn't hard core. The majority of America is pro life.

1
HockeyMom4Trump 1 point ago +1 / -0

Might not be ACB. Could be Lagoa. Or someone else.

2
UpTrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

ACB was at the white house earlier today

1
Pedeville 1 point ago +1 / -0

She also supports shutdown due to covid

16
Phil_Selway 16 points ago +18 / -2

We're using their identity politics bullshit against them

That's the problem. Their rules don't apply to them only us.

2
stonepony [S] 2 points ago +6 / -4

It's about the votes. There are plenty of quality Conservative choices who will also help sway voters because of the optics.

Trump knows what he's doing.

7
Phil_Selway 7 points ago +7 / -0

I'm sure he does, and he hasn't done anything yet. The only thing I see is a lot of people too preoccupied with trying to appease the leftists and win at their own game (optics).

4
snoopy3210 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm sure he does, and he hasn't done anything yet.

he chose the gender

3
DavidIcke 3 points ago +6 / -3

We're not trying to appease leftists. We're trying to get a SCOTUS judge in their successfully. Like it or not, there are a lot of Republicans who are weak. The judge being a woman will provide more encouragement for their RHINO weakness.

It makes the Democrat's look like hypocrites. They will attack and smear a woman, but then turn around and say "how dare you talk about RBG she's a woman!"

Not to mention, most of the MEN members who are conservative are cucks like John Roberts. Amy Barrett has a better conservative record than most of the male members we have on their now, she might be the best for the job regardless of gender

1
stonepony [S] 1 point ago +5 / -4

Don't hate the player. Hate the game.

Trump does not enjoy the liberty of pretending the rules of that game are something different.

Priority #1 is re-election.

12
deleted 12 points ago +14 / -2
-5
DavidIcke -5 points ago +2 / -7

She'll probably be the best judge on the bench. Isn't John Roberts and Gorsuch the ones constantly siding with democrats?

6
deleted 6 points ago +7 / -1
4
spez3 4 points ago +5 / -1

Robert Barnes warns Amy is a fraud -

https://youtu.be/WXdvK7Qxyto