5683
Comments (200)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
48
sustainable_saltmine 48 points ago +49 / -1

not if they don't have any hearings.

JUST VOTE! NO HEARINGS! NO CHANCE FOR THE DEMS TO GRANDSTAND.

Besides, Kamala should be recused because she has a conflict of interest here being a candidate for an office to be affected by the appointee

13
RiverFenix 13 points ago +13 / -0

"Oh I thought this was a Beering... ..with Beer" - GOP Senator

"It is.. It's a Supreme Court Beering" - another GOP Senator

"Here Here, to Beer Beer!" - Mr. Speaker

"Yes, I like beer" - SCJ Nominee

Votes are tallied, 10000 Yays, 0 Nays

BEERING ADJOURNED

4
0bama 4 points ago +4 / -0

Oktoberfest on your mind?

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
7
LurkNoMore 7 points ago +7 / -0

I believe she did and was confirmed something like 85-15. This is why I think she will be the pick. The dems who voted to confirm her to the appellate court will have to explain why they wont confirm her this time.