Nice summary! It seems as though this site is claiming she has globalist positions without evidence, or saying she supports BLM because she has Haitian children. My buddy who is a lawyer calls her a strict constitutionalist, which is kinda what I want. The Cuban woman seems qualified as well. We will see!
We've seen ABC brought up thousands of times here and at our old home on reddit. Never did anyone bring up the bullshit that we have seen the last couple of days. These shills have come out of the woodwork to try and discredit her based on hardly any evidence.
> Fact: ACB has strongly defended 1A. In IL GOP v. Pritzker, she ruled in favor of allowing Pritzker to exempt churches from the lockdown. Despite critics falsely claiming she "ruled for the lockdown," she actually ruled in order to preserve free exercise of religion.
This Executive Order does not limit the free exercise of religion. To protect the health and safety of faith leaders, staff, congregants and visitors, religious organizations and houses of worship are encouraged to consult and
follow the recommended practices and guidelines from the Illinois Department of Public Health. As set forth in the IDPH guidelines, the safest practices
for religious organizations at this time are to provide services online, in a drive‐in format, or outdoors (and consistent with social distancing requirements and guidance regarding wearing face coverings), and to limit indoor services to 10 people. Religious organizations are encouraged to take steps to ensure social distancing, the use of face coverings, and implementation of other public
health measures.
Although we do not rule out the possibility
that someone might be able to prove this type of favoritism in
the enforcement of an otherwise valid response to the
COVID‐19 pandemic, the record in this case falls short. Indeed, the problems of late have centered on ordinary criminal mobs looting stores, not on peaceful protestors.
Essentially underpinning the biased selective enforcement by Pritzker due to "muh peaceful protestors". Now they have precedent to ensure Pritzker can/will always have the unlimited power to decide based on political motives how much/little he wishes to enforce the recommendations put forth by the IDPH.
We already have the votes even if President Trump lost the election.
That said, MAKE YOUR PLANSNOW, AS IN STARTTODAY, ON FIGURING OUT WHICH APOLITICAL PERSON YOU KNOW TO BRING WITH YOU TO THE VOTING BOOTH ON ELECTION DAY ANDHOWYOU WILL BROACH THE TOPIC WITH THEM.
Gotta do it old-school cartoon style too. Put a calendar up with a HUGE red circle on Nov 3. Have another HUGE red circle for the week prior when you make the game plan with the person you're bringing.
If you have to, take PTO or the day off. Know every detail on how you're going to go about that day. Lay the clothes out the night before, know the path to your polling place. Check your status. Do everything you possibly can to not fail. Have an accountability partner (spouse works) that you will talk to later on in the night to be SURE you've voted (and they have too).
REEEE that is too long
That’s what Barack said to Big Mike.
He likes it that way.
Nice summary! It seems as though this site is claiming she has globalist positions without evidence, or saying she supports BLM because she has Haitian children. My buddy who is a lawyer calls her a strict constitutionalist, which is kinda what I want. The Cuban woman seems qualified as well. We will see!
We've seen ABC brought up thousands of times here and at our old home on reddit. Never did anyone bring up the bullshit that we have seen the last couple of days. These shills have come out of the woodwork to try and discredit her based on hardly any evidence.
Thank you for posting the truth.
Fact: We don't know for sure that ACB is the nominee, but if she is, the salt mines will be working overtime.
FACT: Bears beets battlestar galactic
> Fact: ACB has strongly defended 1A. In IL GOP v. Pritzker, she ruled in favor of allowing Pritzker to exempt churches from the lockdown. Despite critics falsely claiming she "ruled for the lockdown," she actually ruled in order to preserve free exercise of religion.
Essentially underpinning the biased selective enforcement by Pritzker due to "muh peaceful protestors". Now they have precedent to ensure Pritzker can/will always have the unlimited power to decide based on political motives how much/little he wishes to enforce the recommendations put forth by the IDPH.
Mr Hussein as we call him...
We already have the votes even if President Trump lost the election.
That said, MAKE YOUR PLANS NOW, AS IN START TODAY, ON FIGURING OUT WHICH APOLITICAL PERSON YOU KNOW TO BRING WITH YOU TO THE VOTING BOOTH ON ELECTION DAY AND HOW YOU WILL BROACH THE TOPIC WITH THEM.
^^^ This is how we win folks
That one simple trick literally instantly DOUBLES your vote’s strength.
Already red pilled my whole family, even got a half Mexican, half Dominican USAF veteran to vote Trump.
Gotta do it old-school cartoon style too. Put a calendar up with a HUGE red circle on Nov 3. Have another HUGE red circle for the week prior when you make the game plan with the person you're bringing.
If you have to, take PTO or the day off. Know every detail on how you're going to go about that day. Lay the clothes out the night before, know the path to your polling place. Check your status. Do everything you possibly can to not fail. Have an accountability partner (spouse works) that you will talk to later on in the night to be SURE you've voted (and they have too).