Constitutional Amendment is in order to prevent this fuckery.
They lose...so they move the goal posts. Well, that shit needs to end and conservatives need to step up in the Senate and start doing real work for a change.
That goes for every amendment. But it’s extremely hard to get an amendment passed by design. And one that limits the amount of Supreme Court justices is not only essential, but one that I think a huge majority of Americans would support.
1st generation landed immigrants should not hold office. I don't care where you're from whether it's Sweden, Somalia or Japan, if you were born there you shouldn't be allowed to hold office in America and decide upon our policies and laws.
Yeah, not when the volume of immigrants is so high, our own culture is under attack, and the people coming in are likely to be indoctrinated with an anti-American view of America by the city people they first come in contact with.
birthright citizenship revoked, retroactive 16 years.
communist control act, expanded to more than just the communist party but to encompass any subversive Marxism.
Second amendment clarified: The right of the people to purchase, make, own, and use all martial weaponry, national security technology notwithstanding, is absolute. The government may enter no contract with a defense company who does not espouse and exercise these ideals.
Libel and slander for public officials is revoked. No more public persona clause that lets you say whatever you want.
Absolute revocation of press protections for any journalist who engages in bias. All mistakes will be assumed to be lies made with malicious intent until otherwise proven with an affirmative defense.
Absolute death penalty and total asset forfeiture for any individual or organization who lends any material support for any Marxist ideology.
Senate controls state level voting laws on federal elections.
Ban on voting when moving states for 10 years unless such move is for military service.
Voting age raised to 26, military service excepted.
any attempt to harbor or facilitate illegal immigration is considered an act of warring invasion and will be responded to as such. Any districts or cities will be considered rogue states.
freedom of speech is absolute in all publicly accessible domains.
You forgot voting rights via property ownership; if you're going to be extreme you can't rightly forget the one that matters most. Replace the Symptom-Treating number 8 with No Voting Without Net Positive Tax Receipts and/or Property Ownership and you've got a pretty good list going here.
I like that you’re asking questions. Often it’s just, “We need to do something,” then nothing else. We all know something needs to be done so asking questions and putting forth ideas is what we should be doing.
Oh please dont forget about an amendment against communism. I have been begging that this get traction. Its the only way the new soviet states of America can be stopped.
They are still pushing the Equal Rights Amendment through, too. Basically trying to make social justice the supreme law of the land. That needs to be stopped.
Fact: Amy Coney Barrett adopted 2 Haitian kids, ignoring the thousands of American kids who badly need adoption, and showing that she makes decisions emotionally, not rationally. She cannot be trusted on immigration and is a terrible choice. Plus look at her stance on the bullshit lockdowns, the fact that she said she won't go against the Pope, who is a globalist stooge, etc.
Thank you for this. The rampant ACB hate on this board is surprising since the last time everyone on this board was mad that ACB wasn't picked over Kavenaugh. Whatever. Lies get thrown about by both sides...I just wish people were more consistent and quit making decisions based on how the wind blows.
That comes later. In fact, watching all these deals and peace negotiations all over the world in seemingly random spots over the last few years...do you get the feeling the chessboard is being set? I think they're setting up for the showdown with the global central banking empire in it's entirety. They keep in power through centuries of conflict. Trump likes doing big things. Doesn't get much bigger than that. We'll see.
I don't know what you are referring to but my major in college was Geography and History of the former soviet union
I wrote my capstone on the Russian Civil War and the multiple power struggles that were outside of the traditional white and red forces. Like Makhno, Czech legion and Kolchaks forces.
I know more about the Russian Civil War and the fallout than one person should. Autism is a hell of a drug. Bolshiviks were not particularly Jewish and were actually less Jewish than their contemporary socialist rivals.
One can simply look at the last names of the founding members of the Menchaviks and the Bolshiviks and count the amount of Jewish people and do the math.
There was about 3 times more jews in the menchaviks and the only prominent Jew in the Bolshiviks leadership was Trotsky whom started as a menchavik and switched sides.
Look it up and get out your counting fingers if you don't belive me and you can figure it out yourself.
Do you think LGBT are massively overrepresented in media, education, entertainment, and government? Because there are way more Jews in all of those fields, and their total population is significantly less than total LGBT numbers.
You do know that list is largely devoid of context, right? Most of those were them getting kicked out of countries, being blamed for plagues and such that they were in no way responsible for.
Likewise, your suggestion involves denying American citizens their citizenship, largely because of guilt by association.
I don't think anyone here is "afraid" to point out what groups are causing problems. We just don't believe in collectivism. We believe in personal responsibility. I do not think personal responsibility is compatible with most racial ideologies, because by definition a racist, like a Marxist, views the individual as a product of the group rather than the reverse. Western racial ideologies, in my opinion, originate from Darwin and from Enlightenment-era attempts to justify chattel slavery. Prior to that, Europeans were not protective of their races, but rather of their family names and religion. You may find Wolfram von Eschenbach's description of a mixed-race (black and white) moslem knight in Parzival interesting. This knight behaves honorably, and then converts to Christianity later in the story, and then serves Arthur and weds a pretty girl. This book was written in the early 1200s, by a German knight!
I do not think it is wise to let the current attempts to produce racial tension sway you one way or another. It is all madness, and all the participants, black, white, Jews, or what have you, are making their groups look bad. The reason the ones at the top are often Jews is because Jews have higher average IQs, and unlike the white SJWs, they work hard. We also had whole synagogues chanting "four more years!" for Trump. Those people do not want SOGI garbage, Mosaic law condemns it absolutely. Mosaic law condemns homosexuality and cross-dressing. They do not want the atheist degeneracy.
It's not Jews that are the problem, it's demons and the people who serve them.
You don’t have to be an anti-Semitic person to understand how the tribe operates. You just need to read what they write and hear what they say. They aren’t shy about it. Just like democrats.
There will not be a "next democrat win". Even Maisie, who has to be one of the dumbest people in the Senate, cautioned at the end of that clip "if the dems take back the Senate".
Their threats to "pack the court" are going to be awfully hard for them pull off when they do not hold the Presidency, the House or the Senate. They really are not in a position to make threats. In fact, they are showing their hand prematurely. Imbeciles.
Getting rid of the electoral college is on the ballot this election for Colorado. Proposition 113: adopt agreement to elect US president by national popular vote. If this passes, Colorado will be the fifteenth state, plus the District of Columbia to join the agreement, bringing the number of committed electoral votes to 196, short of the 270 needed
Well unfortunately I know a lot of people who will vote for this because 1. They hate Donald Trump and are still angry over his win “despite Hillary’s popular vote” (I don’t believe she won legitimately) and 2. They don’t teach the importance of the constitution in schools they way they should and 3. People are stupid.
Two of them, the plan was to mint two of them. If I were him I'd make a third and hide it in a room that can only be found using the map on the back of the declaration of Independence.
Exactly. When President Trump wins, let’s stack the court. Add two more seats. And while we are at it, we should add two more states: I nominate splitting the Dakotas into South North Dakota and North South Dakota along with the current North Dakota and South Dakota.
How would a constitutional amendment get passed? What's the process to get that done? That should be one of the things on top of the list to get done to keep the democrats from shitting all over our constitution.
I'm hoping Republicans take over the house, keep the senate and Trump gets re-elected. Hopefully Republicans take over locally as well (governors, mayors, city council, DA's, etc). A Red Tsunami.
"Make it more objective"..... by adding political actors until you're guaranteed to have only one side's subjective, feeling based opinions represented? What a fucking clown.
Yea well, a person who knows a person who knows a family member of RBG told me her dying wish was actually "It's not okay for democrats to pack the Supreme Court". So to pack the SCOTUS would be a VIOLATION of her dying wish. I can only hope the democrats aren't terrible people who would put their politics before a dying wish!!!
By their logic, if that is a correct thing to do, why wouldn't Republicans just pack the court now? What's to stop them if that's a legal and moral option for everyone? It's just the latest "if you don't do what we want, we will punish you" threat.
Also if they don't, and dems make it 12 judges, what's to stop Republicans from coming back to make it 15... or 24... or fuck it... put 50 conservative judges on the court lol
It seems that there is a limit to appeals to emotion. They can only say "this is it! This crosses the line and nothing is suddenly of the table because of this xyz! You're going to be sorry! " I feel it starting to wear thin, even with the brownshirt kids.
IF the dems win the senate in 2021 and they pull this stunt, then every two years once the other party gets the majority, then they will just pack the court the other way. It will be a complete shit-show. Dems make it 13 in 2021, R's make it 17 in 2023 so on and so forth until every SCOTUS decision is along party lines and no one has any faith in SCOTUS anymore.
HEADLINE 2043: SCOTUS reverses all of last years rulings in controversial 72-71 decision!
That is their plan. They are openly trying to erode faith in our election process with this mail in ballots (cheat by mail) and now they are telling us they want to erode faith in the judicial system. They want to dismantle this great country.
This is especially odd given that Trump is about to fill the vacant seat. So they're essentially threatening to stack the court when there's a conservative majority, so it's implied that it would be done by bypassing the courts.
This would basically lead to a precedent where every new President stacks the court with his cronies, making them de facto in charge of the Judicial branch.
Honestly starting to feel this is their plan. I don’t think they can win the Presidency, but there are a lot of Republican Senators up for election this cycle. And in a lot of those states, a little ballot harvesting will go a long way. I think the main fraud will be in he Senate races
Well packing the court can't really work unless you gain control of both houses of Congress (to pass a law increasing the size of the court), and the Presidency (to sign the new law and to appoint new justices)
Yeah. For second-dumbest, I think of Blumenthal, Markey, Kaine, a couple others. But for the absolute dumbest, I don't see a strong competitor for Mazie.
You know, I've been doing some thinking after reading a few things and watching a few videos, and asking myself, why did the democrats chose Gropey Joe Biden as their 2020 democrat presidential candidate, and Kamala Harris, a failed presidential candidate herself? Well, maybe it's because the party really is using Gropey Joe as a Front for their real plan and don't care that he has no chance of winning at all. They ‘want’ Donald Trump to win. What they are doing is taking all that money and applying it to the lower campaigns for Congressional seats. The campaign money is being spread around to every state so in the end the mail-in ballots will give both chambers to the Marxist democrat party. They're hoping we don't realize if the mail-in ballots cause chaos and confusion for the presidential election, it also causes confusion for the Congressional, and local elections. We won't pay attention to the congressional votes, we'll accept the congressional votes, while fighting over the presidential ballots. They will quietly swear in the fraudulently elected democrat candidates to form a majority for the 117th Congress where Nancy 'might keep her Speaker seat' hoping we don't notice.
They don't care if Trump wins or not, they want both chambers! Then they'll impeach and convict Donald Trump and Michael Pence and put whomever they want in the White House. They'll impeach the last three SCOTUS judges calling them fraudulently seated on the SCOTUS bench and replace those justices with Valerie Jarett, Eric Holder, and Barack Obama. Then, the Marxists will own America. I know it seems far fetched, but I wouldn't put it pass the democrats to plan that very scenario to bury America. I know it sounds like is it possible for them to be that vile? Uhhhhhh, yeaaaaa!!!
Trump should just take her advice! Why wait till the democrats get back in power? If it's truly good for the people then we need to get on that asap! 2 scoops, 4 more years, and 8 more judges! Thanks Hirono, very cool.
“Nine seems to be a good number. It’s been that way for a long time,” Ginsburg told NPR in July 2019. “I think it was a bad idea when President Franklin Roosevelt tried to pack the court. If anything it would make the court look partisan.”
Tropical islands would be pretty cool if it weren't for all the tropical island people. I haven't found one yet that isn't kind of a shit hole once you get off the beach.
We need to defund and dismantle the Democratic party. If they want to completely change all the norms of how our government functions, than nothing should be "off the table" as they say
It's time to kick Hawaii out of the union. They should never have been made a state. We would own the Senate if not for that pissante protectorate filled with anti-American foreigners.
If Republicans get the House, Senate, and Presidency (only House is a slight "if"), they should start pushing through Constitutional Amendments to repeal the 17th amendment, fix the currency, shut down the inflation machine, set specific rules for voting requirements (like ID for Christ's sake!), end modern-day Prohibition to shut down rampant crime and attacks on our civil liberties, etc.
The Dems aren't very forward thinking. Just like with "Hairy Reams" this too could also backfire bigly. They go to a nine person court and in 25-30 years you could have a 7-2 conservative bent.
Stack the Supreme Court. Get rid of Electoral College. Allow permanent mail-in voting and get rid of fraud measures.
The next Democrat win will cement the permanent shift towards Chinafication.
Yes, I know that you think that "The Jews" are responsible.
But, what's the solution?
Constitutional Amendment is in order to prevent this fuckery.
They lose...so they move the goal posts. Well, that shit needs to end and conservatives need to step up in the Senate and start doing real work for a change.
Yes, but what Constitutional amendment?
What would you do? What language would you use to "prevent this fuckery" that doesn't do more harm than good?
Limit the number of justices on SCOTUS to 9.
Can't really argue with that one, no.
Granted in our particular situation this makes perfect sense buttttt....
How easy is it for the people behind the scenes to get 9 blackmailed/corrupted people in a seat for their lifetime?
Anyone else get this weird feeling?
^This is probably the only reason to 'pack' the court.
If it comes apparent that Roberts is compromised, that could become an impetus to pack away.
That goes for every amendment. But it’s extremely hard to get an amendment passed by design. And one that limits the amount of Supreme Court justices is not only essential, but one that I think a huge majority of Americans would support.
Dual citizens may not hold office.
1st generation landed immigrants should not hold office. I don't care where you're from whether it's Sweden, Somalia or Japan, if you were born there you shouldn't be allowed to hold office in America and decide upon our policies and laws.
Immigrants shouldn't be able to vote until 3-4 generations minimum, retroactively.
Also, halt all immigration and start discussions on repatriation...
Yeah, not when the volume of immigrants is so high, our own culture is under attack, and the people coming in are likely to be indoctrinated with an anti-American view of America by the city people they first come in contact with.
birthright citizenship revoked, retroactive 16 years.
communist control act, expanded to more than just the communist party but to encompass any subversive Marxism.
Second amendment clarified: The right of the people to purchase, make, own, and use all martial weaponry, national security technology notwithstanding, is absolute. The government may enter no contract with a defense company who does not espouse and exercise these ideals.
Libel and slander for public officials is revoked. No more public persona clause that lets you say whatever you want.
Absolute revocation of press protections for any journalist who engages in bias. All mistakes will be assumed to be lies made with malicious intent until otherwise proven with an affirmative defense.
Absolute death penalty and total asset forfeiture for any individual or organization who lends any material support for any Marxist ideology.
Senate controls state level voting laws on federal elections.
Ban on voting when moving states for 10 years unless such move is for military service.
Voting age raised to 26, military service excepted.
any attempt to harbor or facilitate illegal immigration is considered an act of warring invasion and will be responded to as such. Any districts or cities will be considered rogue states.
freedom of speech is absolute in all publicly accessible domains.
You forgot voting rights via property ownership; if you're going to be extreme you can't rightly forget the one that matters most. Replace the Symptom-Treating number 8 with No Voting Without Net Positive Tax Receipts and/or Property Ownership and you've got a pretty good list going here.
I also forgot a prohibition on owning land or structures by any non citizen, or corporation operated by more than 40% noncitizens.
China is buying our country out from underneath us, like they did Vancouver.
I like that you’re asking questions. Often it’s just, “We need to do something,” then nothing else. We all know something needs to be done so asking questions and putting forth ideas is what we should be doing.
The entire 1954 Communist Control Act, so it can be enforced without being ruled unconstitutional on 1st Amendment grounds.
Oh please dont forget about an amendment against communism. I have been begging that this get traction. Its the only way the new soviet states of America can be stopped.
They are still pushing the Equal Rights Amendment through, too. Basically trying to make social justice the supreme law of the land. That needs to be stopped.
Why are you rampantly posting this when nobody here actually has input on picking a judge?
Spammer's gotta spam.
To counter the shills that came out of the woodwork the last couple of days.
Did you just get smarter? That's why. Believe me the other side is dumb and they don't care about learning the truth.
Learn. Be able to argue against their talki g points. Sow cognitive dissonance.
Speak for yourself. They lurk here.
Fact: Amy Coney Barrett adopted 2 Haitian kids, ignoring the thousands of American kids who badly need adoption, and showing that she makes decisions emotionally, not rationally. She cannot be trusted on immigration and is a terrible choice. Plus look at her stance on the bullshit lockdowns, the fact that she said she won't go against the Pope, who is a globalist stooge, etc.
This is off-topic spam. I've seen you post the same message elsewhere.
Spamming is his second favorite activity, second only to reporting people online.
Thank you for this. The rampant ACB hate on this board is surprising since the last time everyone on this board was mad that ACB wasn't picked over Kavenaugh. Whatever. Lies get thrown about by both sides...I just wish people were more consistent and quit making decisions based on how the wind blows.
Has she made any rulings about the COVID lockdowns?
Start by getting rid of the federal reserve.
Another one that I can't argue with, really.
That comes later. In fact, watching all these deals and peace negotiations all over the world in seemingly random spots over the last few years...do you get the feeling the chessboard is being set? I think they're setting up for the showdown with the global central banking empire in it's entirety. They keep in power through centuries of conflict. Trump likes doing big things. Doesn't get much bigger than that. We'll see.
Bolshiviks were less Jewish than the menshiviks
Trying to make Bolshiviks into some sort of Jewish disparagement is ignorant of history.
Ilhan Omar's people are here propagating ideas.
Omar is a Soros plant, so this is accurate, but not in the way you think...
I'm fairly certain.
I don't know what you are referring to but my major in college was Geography and History of the former soviet union
I wrote my capstone on the Russian Civil War and the multiple power struggles that were outside of the traditional white and red forces. Like Makhno, Czech legion and Kolchaks forces.
I know more about the Russian Civil War and the fallout than one person should. Autism is a hell of a drug. Bolshiviks were not particularly Jewish and were actually less Jewish than their contemporary socialist rivals.
I'm only making the claim that antisemites here stand with Ilhan Omar.
One can stand against both.
I wouldn't characterize it like that. Some people are just assholes.
On the flip side their is a lot of Jewish that are assholes.
I'd like to point out that Ginsburg was the most over represented IDPOL
Jewish and a women
3 Jewish people are on the SC and two of those are women.
Wouldn't it be an issue to have 3 J-dubs on the SC?
That'd be nice, if it were true, which it is not.
One can simply look at the last names of the founding members of the Menchaviks and the Bolshiviks and count the amount of Jewish people and do the math.
There was about 3 times more jews in the menchaviks and the only prominent Jew in the Bolshiviks leadership was Trotsky whom started as a menchavik and switched sides.
Look it up and get out your counting fingers if you don't belive me and you can figure it out yourself.
Yes, but the answer to "who owns the media" and "who can't we criticize" is always "The Jews."
That's what I focused on.
This isn't the first time I've seen the word Bolshivik being shoe horned into being anti-semetic
The truth of the matter was more menshaviks were Jewish than Bolshiviks and the one prominent Jewish bolshivik (Trotsky) was originally a menshivik
I'm just trying to stop the rewriting of history.
Do you think LGBT are massively overrepresented in media, education, entertainment, and government? Because there are way more Jews in all of those fields, and their total population is significantly less than total LGBT numbers.
Just a smidgen, yes.
You do know that list is largely devoid of context, right? Most of those were them getting kicked out of countries, being blamed for plagues and such that they were in no way responsible for.
Likewise, your suggestion involves denying American citizens their citizenship, largely because of guilt by association.
Can't say I'm impressed.
Your way is not a solution.
Some have called the "final" one, and it was as terrible an idea then as it is now.
I don't think anyone here is "afraid" to point out what groups are causing problems. We just don't believe in collectivism. We believe in personal responsibility. I do not think personal responsibility is compatible with most racial ideologies, because by definition a racist, like a Marxist, views the individual as a product of the group rather than the reverse. Western racial ideologies, in my opinion, originate from Darwin and from Enlightenment-era attempts to justify chattel slavery. Prior to that, Europeans were not protective of their races, but rather of their family names and religion. You may find Wolfram von Eschenbach's description of a mixed-race (black and white) moslem knight in Parzival interesting. This knight behaves honorably, and then converts to Christianity later in the story, and then serves Arthur and weds a pretty girl. This book was written in the early 1200s, by a German knight!
I do not think it is wise to let the current attempts to produce racial tension sway you one way or another. It is all madness, and all the participants, black, white, Jews, or what have you, are making their groups look bad. The reason the ones at the top are often Jews is because Jews have higher average IQs, and unlike the white SJWs, they work hard. We also had whole synagogues chanting "four more years!" for Trump. Those people do not want SOGI garbage, Mosaic law condemns it absolutely. Mosaic law condemns homosexuality and cross-dressing. They do not want the atheist degeneracy.
It's not Jews that are the problem, it's demons and the people who serve them.
Fucking toddlers.
😆😆
But were you jailed though? In Europe you can literally get jailed for criticizing one group
Doesn't matter where the quote is from. I didn't quote Voltaire. The quote is still true.
Here’s a Jewish man openly admitting the Jews’ miscalculation in pushing mass immigration on America.
Here’s a Jewish man pushing for holocaust education in third world countries because third world peoples don’t give Jewish victimhood its due primacy.
You don’t have to be an anti-Semitic person to understand how the tribe operates. You just need to read what they write and hear what they say. They aren’t shy about it. Just like democrats.
Ever read the Talmud?
Well, the left has been threatening to burn things down if they don't get their way, so if the shoe fits...
Those of us who are parents have known this truth for millenia, kek! 😂
No noticing allowed, goyim!
China, Soros, Rothschild
They do that and it will be war. Seriously you can’t tell 1/2 of the population and 85% of the land are they no longer have any power.
If the dems did that, it would prompt a watering of the tree of liberty.
With what does one water the tree of liberty?
Blood.
I don't always bleed, but when I do, it's red.
The blood of tyrants.
... and Patriots!
There will not be a "next democrat win". Even Maisie, who has to be one of the dumbest people in the Senate, cautioned at the end of that clip "if the dems take back the Senate".
Their threats to "pack the court" are going to be awfully hard for them pull off when they do not hold the Presidency, the House or the Senate. They really are not in a position to make threats. In fact, they are showing their hand prematurely. Imbeciles.
Getting rid of the electoral college is on the ballot this election for Colorado. Proposition 113: adopt agreement to elect US president by national popular vote. If this passes, Colorado will be the fifteenth state, plus the District of Columbia to join the agreement, bringing the number of committed electoral votes to 196, short of the 270 needed
Well unfortunately I know a lot of people who will vote for this because 1. They hate Donald Trump and are still angry over his win “despite Hillary’s popular vote” (I don’t believe she won legitimately) and 2. They don’t teach the importance of the constitution in schools they way they should and 3. People are stupid.
This lady is the biggest piece of shit in the country.
Hirono- D CH
I know a Kenyan who would disagree with you on that
SPICY
TRUTHY
CHIN-STEIN. Bat eating demon
right next to Mittens but yea pretty much
Mazie might be the dumbest member of the Senate. I mean that with all my heart. Truly idiotic.
Mittens will vote yes though.
No he wont
Ilhan Omar. At least hirona didn’t commit immigration fraud.
Theres no proof she isn't sleeping with family members.
Yup...
Along with the Squad.
And Jay-a-pal....now, remember, that's "Jay" just like "Pay". Got that?!?
One of the biggest pieces of shit in a sea of shit.
The Dems would add 100+ SCJs and would not give a single shit and the MSM would gush over them while they do it.
Remember when 0bama was mulling the idea of minting a Trillion dollar coin and the news claimed how brilliant it was?
Two of them, the plan was to mint two of them. If I were him I'd make a third and hide it in a room that can only be found using the map on the back of the declaration of Independence.
Exactly. When President Trump wins, let’s stack the court. Add two more seats. And while we are at it, we should add two more states: I nominate splitting the Dakotas into South North Dakota and North South Dakota along with the current North Dakota and South Dakota.
Split north New York and north California into their own states and you have two new deep red states!
Republicans should pass a law prohibiting more than 9 Supreme Court judges if they take back the house next year.
How would a constitutional amendment get passed? What's the process to get that done? That should be one of the things on top of the list to get done to keep the democrats from shitting all over our constitution.
I'm hoping Republicans take over the house, keep the senate and Trump gets re-elected. Hopefully Republicans take over locally as well (governors, mayors, city council, DA's, etc). A Red Tsunami.
That's already the law. The only way to make it stronger is to pass a constitutional amendment.
Mazie Hirono is the most retarded person in the Senate and an absolute piece of shit. Legitimately one of the dumbest people in existence.
"Make it more objective"..... by adding political actors until you're guaranteed to have only one side's subjective, feeling based opinions represented? What a fucking clown.
Yea well, a person who knows a person who knows a family member of RBG told me her dying wish was actually "It's not okay for democrats to pack the Supreme Court". So to pack the SCOTUS would be a VIOLATION of her dying wish. I can only hope the democrats aren't terrible people who would put their politics before a dying wish!!!
Underrated
I FCKN SPIT OUT MY TEA AHAHAHAHA
What happens if Congress flips and Republicans keep the Presidency and the Senate... hmmm
That is why they won't come right out and say it.
1.) Pack the court with 100 judges
2.) Rule that 9 judges is the max, grandfather the current judges in
3.) Profit?
Step 3: Keep America great
Give Hawaii back to the natives, de-state it, make it a territory, and go with 49.
Divide California into multiple states while you're at it.
Is there any way we can trade Hawaii for Greenland? We make great deals.
By their logic, if that is a correct thing to do, why wouldn't Republicans just pack the court now? What's to stop them if that's a legal and moral option for everyone? It's just the latest "if you don't do what we want, we will punish you" threat.
Also if they don't, and dems make it 12 judges, what's to stop Republicans from coming back to make it 15... or 24... or fuck it... put 50 conservative judges on the court lol
It seems that there is a limit to appeals to emotion. They can only say "this is it! This crosses the line and nothing is suddenly of the table because of this xyz! You're going to be sorry! " I feel it starting to wear thin, even with the brownshirt kids.
IF the dems win the senate in 2021 and they pull this stunt, then every two years once the other party gets the majority, then they will just pack the court the other way. It will be a complete shit-show. Dems make it 13 in 2021, R's make it 17 in 2023 so on and so forth until every SCOTUS decision is along party lines and no one has any faith in SCOTUS anymore.
HEADLINE 2043: SCOTUS reverses all of last years rulings in controversial 72-71 decision!
That is their plan. They are openly trying to erode faith in our election process with this mail in ballots (cheat by mail) and now they are telling us they want to erode faith in the judicial system. They want to dismantle this great country.
This is especially odd given that Trump is about to fill the vacant seat. So they're essentially threatening to stack the court when there's a conservative majority, so it's implied that it would be done by bypassing the courts.
This would basically lead to a precedent where every new President stacks the court with his cronies, making them de facto in charge of the Judicial branch.
Yes. Trump is effectively doing so. Given another term, he'll have 7-2 in non-cucked cases and 6-3 or 5-4 in cucking cases.
Honestly starting to feel this is their plan. I don’t think they can win the Presidency, but there are a lot of Republican Senators up for election this cycle. And in a lot of those states, a little ballot harvesting will go a long way. I think the main fraud will be in he Senate races
Well packing the court can't really work unless you gain control of both houses of Congress (to pass a law increasing the size of the court), and the Presidency (to sign the new law and to appoint new justices)
They'll do it if they win in 2020. It's important to keep that from happening. Vote.
lol Dems still making free campaign commercials for Trump
Dumbest person in the Senate.
Yeah. For second-dumbest, I think of Blumenthal, Markey, Kaine, a couple others. But for the absolute dumbest, I don't see a strong competitor for Mazie.
You know, I've been doing some thinking after reading a few things and watching a few videos, and asking myself, why did the democrats chose Gropey Joe Biden as their 2020 democrat presidential candidate, and Kamala Harris, a failed presidential candidate herself? Well, maybe it's because the party really is using Gropey Joe as a Front for their real plan and don't care that he has no chance of winning at all. They ‘want’ Donald Trump to win. What they are doing is taking all that money and applying it to the lower campaigns for Congressional seats. The campaign money is being spread around to every state so in the end the mail-in ballots will give both chambers to the Marxist democrat party. They're hoping we don't realize if the mail-in ballots cause chaos and confusion for the presidential election, it also causes confusion for the Congressional, and local elections. We won't pay attention to the congressional votes, we'll accept the congressional votes, while fighting over the presidential ballots. They will quietly swear in the fraudulently elected democrat candidates to form a majority for the 117th Congress where Nancy 'might keep her Speaker seat' hoping we don't notice.
They don't care if Trump wins or not, they want both chambers! Then they'll impeach and convict Donald Trump and Michael Pence and put whomever they want in the White House. They'll impeach the last three SCOTUS judges calling them fraudulently seated on the SCOTUS bench and replace those justices with Valerie Jarett, Eric Holder, and Barack Obama. Then, the Marxists will own America. I know it seems far fetched, but I wouldn't put it pass the democrats to plan that very scenario to bury America. I know it sounds like is it possible for them to be that vile? Uhhhhhh, yeaaaaa!!!
They want to change the rules again?
After they got fucked over with the Biden rule?
After they got fucked over by the Nuclear option?
It's hilarious when they cry about shit they brought onto themselves a decade later.
Cocaine Mitch warned them this would happen
Trump should just take her advice! Why wait till the democrats get back in power? If it's truly good for the people then we need to get on that asap! 2 scoops, 4 more years, and 8 more judges! Thanks Hirono, very cool.
“Nine seems to be a good number. It’s been that way for a long time,” Ginsburg told NPR in July 2019. “I think it was a bad idea when President Franklin Roosevelt tried to pack the court. If anything it would make the court look partisan.”
Tropical islands would be pretty cool if it weren't for all the tropical island people. I haven't found one yet that isn't kind of a shit hole once you get off the beach.
Taiwan is pretty sweet.
Because they can’t win on a level playing field.
I hope you are right.
Asian Karen
I hate this woman’s self righteousnous
We need to defund and dismantle the Democratic party. If they want to completely change all the norms of how our government functions, than nothing should be "off the table" as they say
IF
"If-if-if-if-if-if-if-if-if-if-if-if"
If.... If is good.
I've been saying this from the start. They care MUCH more about keeping the House and taking the Senate than the Presidency.
They'll have complete impeachment power and could do pretty much anything they wanted.
Even if they take the Senate, they aren't getting 66 votes there to convict on Impeachment.
It's time to kick Hawaii out of the union. They should never have been made a state. We would own the Senate if not for that pissante protectorate filled with anti-American foreigners.
She is a danger to the United States. That crazy bitch needs to be hung from a yard arm.
Strongly agree!
Liberals aren’t winners. They never win. They’ve never won. So they have to cheat or change the rules of the game.
There are a lot of idiots in congress. She’s certainly a front runner.
Hirono is hands down the dumbest person in the Senate, quite possibly the dumbest person to ever be a Senator in our country's ~250 year history.
If Republicans get the House, Senate, and Presidency (only House is a slight "if"), they should start pushing through Constitutional Amendments to repeal the 17th amendment, fix the currency, shut down the inflation machine, set specific rules for voting requirements (like ID for Christ's sake!), end modern-day Prohibition to shut down rampant crime and attacks on our civil liberties, etc.
"To make the court more objective" lmao they think we're retarded
aka "to allow our activist judges to legislate from the bench"
See what she did there? She WARNED you!
"If the dems take back the Senate...."
We must stop that from happening!
On a side note, if any women deserves to get punched in the face its this one.
F’n retarded.
They can’t win bc they’ve shitty radical policies.
They can’t make laws bc no one will pass them.
So instead, let’s change around everything so we can win.
Must suck to be a Libtard. So. Much. Losing.
I'm not encouraging violence but if they do this, there will be senators dragged out and killed in the streets.
I may not be the senators who vote on this, it may be a few years later, but this is a one way ticket to sectarian violence.
We know what you want, Pinko.
This is why they can never be given power again.
Who is dumber? Sen. Hirono or Sen. Whitehouse? I genuinely can't decide.
When was the last time these losers thought out America's finances, wrote a budget, put it out for discussion, voted on it and took the consequences?
She and none of her pals have the guts, none of them are leaders, just nasty back stabbers.
The Universe wants to reclaim it's time Hirono.
The Dems aren't very forward thinking. Just like with "Hairy Reams" this too could also backfire bigly. They go to a nine person court and in 25-30 years you could have a 7-2 conservative bent.
Has been their undoing. Knee jerk reactions to satiate the rabid left. Dems used to be pro unions, blue collar working man, etc.
They have no platform, and the only retards still on the plantation are there for the gibs.
For a liberal, there is no bad idea to ever drop. These people have been pushing this since FDR.
Have to win this election and disband the democratic party before they disband democracy.
WE know. That is why we vote.
Trump is destroying the constitution!
We have to destroy the constitution to stop him from destroying the constitution!
“The SCOTUS got stacked against our favor, we must add more seats so we can stack it the OTHER way!”
When we have a state that surrounded by water, far away from the upper 48 states, it produces absolute fucking morons like this one.