4795
Comments (228)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
20
Batmann58 20 points ago +21 / -1

Not that I think this is Trump's fault, but if you don't think that a American Civil War would be the catalyst to a third world War I don't know what to tell you.

22
deleted 22 points ago +22 / -0
19
deleted 19 points ago +19 / -0
3
gaijin_ronin 3 points ago +3 / -0

1000 round spam cans of chang grade ammo will be supplied. Pop, poop, ping, puff sounding just like some cheap old 22lr. I mean have you seen the raggedy MREs china supplies to their troops. All their shit is just that.

7
satan 7 points ago +7 / -0

I have a machine shop and a 3D model of .... something. Supposedly it drops right in. But I wouldn't know.

4
Rooster-J-Cogburn 4 points ago +4 / -0

Lol, I still have a shit load of "real" coat hangers

1
Coolmishi 1 point ago +1 / -0

My father Had a machine shop on his property and he actually Made a machine gun. He and my brother took it to the desert and it actually worked! But that is the story I heard so who knows if it’s true! Wink wink nod nod!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
6
befehlistbefehl 6 points ago +6 / -0

Select Fire rifles are not that much of a force multiplier versus semi auto rifles. TBH I would consider a decent optic to be a much bigger force multiplier for an AR/ AK than full auto capability. Especially on the scale of only tens of thousands of rifles. That's a drop in the bucket compared to the number of MSRs in circulation. Now if we were talking of tens of thousands of say PKMs (or any GPMG), then that would be a whole different story. I do wonder why they would need to get rifles from china, or even full auto FCGs.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
befehlistbefehl 2 points ago +2 / -0

Crap I forgot about selectfire handguns. Don't those have a rate of fire as high as an MG42? And are hard to hit with. I'd rather take a cheap SMG from ww2 (STEN, M3, PPSH) over one of those if I expected anybody to shoot back at me. Maybe they don't think people will shoot back? Or maybe they just don't think (like at all)?

7
South_Florida_Guy 7 points ago +7 / -0

"American civil war"... have you actually seen the other side?

13
spezisacuckold 13 points ago +13 / -0

The real worry is all these other countries jumping in and helping the Democrats (“we need to stabilize/normalize the region”) because they all have a vested interest in putting America Last.

8
ImVoting4Trump 8 points ago +9 / -1

This 100%. If it was us vs the left, it would be over in a matter of days, but it’s not going to be us vs the left. It’s going to be us vs the rest of the world.

4
MakeAmericaLegendary 4 points ago +4 / -0

Everyone on this site needs to read this chain.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
5
ChokingOnARedpill 5 points ago +5 / -0

See here's the thing...the majority of the flash points in a "Second Civil War" are gonna be civilians, police, and MAYBE some National Guard. It would have to be REALLY bad for the full US Military to be involved. We'd almost certainly still have them protecting our borders and stationed around the world combating any external threat. And they'd still go relatively unmatched. Not saying a civil war wouldn't weaken us but probably not endanger the nation as a whole from another power.

TLDR, Red Dawn ain't possible.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
Batmann58 3 points ago +3 / -0

Do you not believe that there is a significant portion of them in our military?

I firmly believe they are the minority but don't kid yourself into thinking the other side consists solely of gender confused pixie faggots.

3
JudgeWhoAllowsStuff 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well, the other side is white liberals trying to make it a race war, and they only have to hurt, kill, or sterilize themselves to “win”. And they’re doing that in droves.