2487
Comments (191)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-6
Rhayne -6 points ago +7 / -13

Well until it develops a brain and nervous system, its just a lump of flesh.

-2
ItsTooMuchWinning -2 points ago +2 / -4

They develop a brain 5 weeks after conception and a nervous system 4 weeks after conception.

So if you're interested in cutting abortions down to the first month, that's a step in the right direction.

--

You are also a "lump of flesh" arranged by DNA into a living human being, same as the unborn.

1
loveshock 1 point ago +2 / -1

Based on your own logic, you should be okay with that then. But you won't stand for that...you want to go further. So you aren't being honest.

1
ItsTooMuchWinning 1 point ago +1 / -0

By what logic?

I'm pretty consistent that the fetus has its own DNA (and is its own person) from conception. Every thing else is just stages of growth.

3
loveshock 3 points ago +3 / -0

Rhayne said until it develops a nervous system, it's just a clump of cells.

You pointed out when this happens, and that it's a "step in the right direction".

Thus you admit, it's better to abort a 2 week old fetus, than a 2 month old fetus.

Yet you also claim that life begins at conception and it's the same to abort a zygote as it is to kill a 30 year old woman.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
-8
Rhayne -8 points ago +5 / -13

I'm aware. My outlook is if you fuck, then you pay the consequences. Only allow abortions for things like rape & it has to be before 4 weeks.

--

Again, I'm aware captain obvious. Until my brain was developed, I was just a literal lump of flesh. You don't seem to be capable of understanding the difference. Is your brain infected with jebus?

-1
ItsTooMuchWinning -1 points ago +2 / -3

"Lump" implies random arrangement. If you take a bunch of cells and "lump" them together, that's not the same as what you get with a fetus.

-6
Rhayne -6 points ago +3 / -9

That's just your assumption based off flawed perception.

-.-