I haven't seen any solid argument against Barrett and the Left froths at the mouth at the sound of her name. The more I read about Lagoa, the more I like her as well.
It seems to me that both are solid picks. And no, I don't see adoption of Haitian children following a catastrophic natural disaster as any blemish on her character. On the contrary, it's an example of Christian charity that has been practiced by Christians for a very long time.
As I recall ACB wrote that she would abstain from ruling on any issue the Pope had taken a stance on. That could prove to be worse than leaving the seat vacant.
I haven't seen any solid argument against Barrett and the Left froths at the mouth at the sound of her name. The more I read about Lagoa, the more I like her as well.
It seems to me that both are solid picks. And no, I don't see adoption of Haitian children following a catastrophic natural disaster as any blemish on her character. On the contrary, it's an example of Christian charity that has been practiced by Christians for a very long time.
As I recall ACB wrote that she would abstain from ruling on any issue the Pope had taken a stance on. That could prove to be worse than leaving the seat vacant.
The same Christian charity that wants to take millions of "refugees" from Africa.
There's a difference between individual charity and forcing others to pay for importing poor people.
Tell that to the Pope.
You mean the same Pope that Amy Coney Barrett will always side with?
Solid arguments: she supported the recent lockdowns.
To Clarify ACB supported the lock downs. She will bend a kee to the government most of the time. Try rhis link from Viva Frei and Barnes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXdvK7Qxyto&feature=youtu.be&t=685
If they're both good picks, but one is easier to confirm, then pick the one that's easier to confirm.