I agree that they should provide actual scientific information since WHO is US funded. Skewing information or conclusions based on weird or poorly designed studies, using percentages and hiding the real numbers is not scientific. I'd even go so far as to call it the anti-thesis of science. (Notably the APA when cited by leftist, not necessarily WHO but it definitely highlights the broadness of this problem.)
I agree that they should provide actual scientific information since WHO is US funded. Skewing information or conclusions based on weird or poorly designed studies, using percentages and hiding the real numbers is not scientific. I'd even go so far as to call it the anti-thesis of science. (Notably the APA when cited by leftist, not necessarily WHO but it definitely highlights the broadness of this problem.)