4995
Comments (265)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
13
PotatoFarmer20 13 points ago +17 / -4

Its not a conspiracy theory if its all documented and provable. Then its called a criminal conspiracy.

And the idea that we should only focus on China, as if only one foreign country wants to destroy the USA, is laughable. Why not focus on all threats and deal with them.

14
deleted 14 points ago +17 / -3
1
godaddy42 1 point ago +2 / -1

RIGHT O BRING IN THE a bomb and wipe them off this planet.

1
BannedbyRed 1 point ago +1 / -0

If if it....

And when has it ever been documented that millions of individuals From all different Socioeconomic and countries conspire together to this end? Never. It’s a few families of super wealthy.... and their coconspirators are Super wealthy Catholics and super wealthy Protestants and super wealthy Saudi princes ...

0
PotatoFarmer20 0 points ago +1 / -1

This entire subthread was started over the jewish control of media. And now you clowns have come out of the woodwork, simping. Now, you're replying to my point with an unrelated point. Its like arguing with a lefty. Can't stay on one issue. Constant shifts to destabilize the debate.

All the groups above also play roles. But not specifically in the media. The 4am talking points coordinate the mass disinfo campaign that is the MSM. Or does the news all come out with the same spin on every story, using the same keywords, by miraculous coincidence? Wake up.

1
BannedbyRed 1 point ago +1 / -0

So, instead of addressing the point... you just use an ad hominem assertion about my point?

Uh, ok.... you argue like a liberal

0
PotatoFarmer20 0 points ago +1 / -1

You reply to my point with an unrelated point. I point that out. Then you accuse me of going off topic. Followed by an ad hominem attack.

Lmao. Thats rich.

1
jomten 1 point ago +1 / -0

Criminal conspiracy? So you can charge them right? Oh wait, they must own all the judges too. No proof needed for that, just start at the conclusion and backwards rationalize the rest until it fits.

I came to trump because the left does this all the time and I knew enough to not believe things blindly. Jewish conspiracy theory is stupid, its the same as the white privilege conspiracy shit BLM is pushing.

1
PotatoFarmer20 1 point ago +1 / -0

Jesus. Let it die. You're wrong. Yes they can be charged. Yes they will be charged. Misprison of treason. RICO. Possibly 2384 charges if they had direct involvment. Do you think the Smith Mundt Act was repealed for no reason? That the Countering Disinformation and Propaganda Act was passed to allow the use of agitprop on the American people for no reason? Wake up. Information warfare.

"They must own all the judges too". Yup. Its definitely a 'conspiracy theory' that Soros and his ilk are buying DAs races and misusing the legal system. Definitely a conspiracy that these DAs are railroading people they disagree with (McCloskey couple) and protecting those they agree with (Smollet). Definitely a conspiracy that all these democrat Soros backed DAs are letting rapists and murderers out pretrial without bail. There are countless examples. But you dont want to see it. Thats not virtue. That is willful ignorance.

You're the one who is "starting at the conclusion" and "rationalizing backwards" to justify you're belief. Not me. You are wrong. Have a lovely day! I know i will!

1
jomten 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not all democrats are jews.

Not all jews are democrats.

If you want to hate on Soros, im right there with you. But if you want to use Soros to support a jewish conspiracy, thats retarded.

1
PotatoFarmer20 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hell. Id agree with you for the most part. Youre thinking of it the wrong way. Jewish conspiracy does absolutely exist. Among religious Jews? Not so much. I still maintain that it's a broken faith based upon a broken covenant, but thats an argument for another time.

Is there a conspiracy among those who are ethnically jewish but worship another God entirely? Yes. Small subset of ethnic jews who arent religous but hide behind their ancestry and past abuses. Ala Soros, Rothschilds, Rockafellers, etc.

So that poses an interesting question. Can one detach the fact that some many problems seem to involve exclusively God's chosen people, whether religious or just ethnically tied? Should i omit the race when speaking about gang violence in Chicago cuz its not convenient, or acknowledge an obvious pattern? Its almost entirely black with a growing hispanic involvement. Turning a blind eye to a problem doesnt make it go away. It just allows it to sneak up on you. The media is corruptb and controlled by a small group of people who are almost entirely Jewish. Is that an incorrect assertion?