643
Comments (21)
sorted by:
26
deleted 26 points ago +26 / -0
19
KarpLykov 19 points ago +19 / -0

They upgraded from pistols to long guns

10
thisisatestof2 10 points ago +10 / -0

Before most only had their pistols and a few carried AR-15s and others various less lethal. Now almost al had ARs.

21
BKav 21 points ago +21 / -0

Sure would like to see them used. That might provide some deterrence from more of this bullshit

4
TheTuckerDiaries 4 points ago +4 / -0

In due time

19
WitnessMe 19 points ago +19 / -0

I'm at work girlfriend text third officer shot if anyone can verify.

6
fj9041jg8nqheufhqiun 6 points ago +6 / -0

Twitter thread told third got shot as well, REEEEEEFRESH

16
JuicyfearsMAGA 16 points ago +16 / -0

Not hot enough

13
Emperorvoid 13 points ago +13 / -0

Lead works better than rubber. USE IT!

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
6
PabloEscobeer 6 points ago +6 / -0

Should’ve shot them.

6
Beat_to_Quarters 6 points ago +7 / -1

Real guns? As opposed to prop guns?

13
Siteless_Vagrant [S] 13 points ago +13 / -0

As apposed to pepper ball and rubber bullets.

4
Beat_to_Quarters 4 points ago +4 / -0

How did they know if they weren't equipped with live ammo before?

7
Siteless_Vagrant [S] 7 points ago +8 / -1

What dude? What are you asking? Pepper ball and rubber bullet guns look distinctly different than actual guns. Is that what you're asking?

4
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 4 points ago +4 / -0

Long guns as opposed to pistols. They definitely had side arms at all times.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Thearchduke 2 points ago +3 / -1

Hmmm...why not HAVE A CURFEW????

Am I stupid or would a curfew not be appropriate?

1
Siteless_Vagrant [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

They did have a curfew. Is that supposed to stop rioters?

0
Thearchduke 0 points ago +1 / -1

Uh...no, but, if you were the least big cognizant of the whole reason for a curfew, it would answer your question.

I'll make it simple for you: Curfew, by definition, as you may have guessed means that it is illegal to be out after X o'clock. Now, the petulant among us would say "Hmmm...why not ARREST violators, rather than let them just mill about?"

That's just overactive imagination, though.

0
tgkx 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yes. You arrest the violators for the curfew violation.