Never in a million years would they honor it. Lets just say Trump did that and the election was held normally? They would still cheat or declare victory or call it whatever. And now the court is 4-4.
No fucking way Trump gives them anything. Fill that seat now for the inevitable election shit show that is coming.
Go read Jacobson v Massachusetts. Barrett tacitly consented to that piece of case law when she sided with Ellis who used it as "guidance" in the Illinois lockdown case.
Jacobson is scary as fuck and hadn't been used by the courts as precedent for 70+ years, and for good reason, until Ellis and Barret came along. That case law gives the government wayyy too much control over our lives. It's as bad as Wickard v Filburn and Plessy v Ferguson.
She shouldn't have ever been within a mile of concurring with Ellis just based off of Ellis's use of Jacobson. That indicates to me that she's either a statist, has a weak mind, or is close enough to either that I will not support her nomination.
We already know what the Communists are. Playing gotcha by sacrificing your own political power only strengthens the political left and reinforces the perception that the political right is inept.
Did I mention Democrats don't ever hold back? They've never apologized and they've been doubling down on everything ever since they surrendered at Appomattox.
They are on their last leg and panicking. We wouldn't give them any power. Their fuel at this moment is SCOTUS. If you take that away it crushes them. They won't accept and will be devastated. It would divide them into pieces.
With your little trick the media would have a strong argument in saying that nominating a judge is something that Trump does only out of spite and maliciousness against the libtards. It's only to punish the Democrats for not conceding the elections he wants.
Our argument is simply that it's our right and it's the best thing for the country to get a new Justice.
I'm not here to argue Trumps right to nominate the scotus. I am not here to say we delay. In fact nothing changes in my scenario except the physiological minds of the NPCs. Trump makes an offer they will refuse. He publically shares it in a presser and in tweets. Everything today has two sides, the goal is to expose their intent. They don't care about SCOTUS. They only care about chaos.
Never in a million years would they honor it. Lets just say Trump did that and the election was held normally? They would still cheat or declare victory or call it whatever. And now the court is 4-4.
No fucking way Trump gives them anything. Fill that seat now for the inevitable election shit show that is coming.
FILL THE SEAT NOW!
They won't accept the offer. That's the point.
Go read Jacobson v Massachusetts. Barrett tacitly consented to that piece of case law when she sided with Ellis who used it as "guidance" in the Illinois lockdown case.
Jacobson is scary as fuck and hadn't been used by the courts as precedent for 70+ years, and for good reason, until Ellis and Barret came along. That case law gives the government wayyy too much control over our lives. It's as bad as Wickard v Filburn and Plessy v Ferguson.
She shouldn't have ever been within a mile of concurring with Ellis just based off of Ellis's use of Jacobson. That indicates to me that she's either a statist, has a weak mind, or is close enough to either that I will not support her nomination.
NO DEALS!
They are owed nothing but a severe ass kicking on Nov. 3rd
Did you bother reading the post? It's not a deal. It's an offer they won't accept. The purpose is to expose their intentions.
We already know what the Communists are. Playing gotcha by sacrificing your own political power only strengthens the political left and reinforces the perception that the political right is inept.
Did I mention Democrats don't ever hold back? They've never apologized and they've been doubling down on everything ever since they surrendered at Appomattox.
They are on their last leg and panicking. We wouldn't give them any power. Their fuel at this moment is SCOTUS. If you take that away it crushes them. They won't accept and will be devastated. It would divide them into pieces.
OP, you play checkers and not chess.
With your little trick the media would have a strong argument in saying that nominating a judge is something that Trump does only out of spite and maliciousness against the libtards. It's only to punish the Democrats for not conceding the elections he wants.
Our argument is simply that it's our right and it's the best thing for the country to get a new Justice.
Also it has nothing to do with spite. It's about reducing the manufactured crises the Dems have created.
I'm not here to argue Trumps right to nominate the scotus. I am not here to say we delay. In fact nothing changes in my scenario except the physiological minds of the NPCs. Trump makes an offer they will refuse. He publically shares it in a presser and in tweets. Everything today has two sides, the goal is to expose their intent. They don't care about SCOTUS. They only care about chaos.
I understood what you meant. I'm saying it's not a good idea because it'll give the media more ammunitions to oppose the nomination.
Trump is the master of controlling the media. I believe if done correctly it could create a big problem for Dems at the worst time.