29
Comments (12)
sorted by:
4
polish_snausage 4 points ago +4 / -0

Is that the representative for China?

2
elsabio [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

LOL!

-5
deleted -5 points ago +1 / -6
1
Former_RM2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Go read Jacobson v Massachusetts. Barrett tacitly consented to that piece of case law when she sided with Ellis who used it as "guidance" in the Illinois lockdown case.

Jacobson is scary as fuck and hadn't been used by the courts as precedent for 70+ years, and for good reason, until Ellis and Barret came along. That case law gives the government wayyy too much control over our lives. It's as bad as Wickard v Filburn and Plessy v Ferguson.

She shouldn't have ever been within a mile of concurring with Ellis just based off of Ellis's use of Jacobson. That indicates to me that she's either a statist, has a weak mind, or is close enough to either that I will not support her nomination.

3
CaptBlank75 3 points ago +3 / -0

Maybe her Chinese spy chauffeur can step in for her.

2
Kckroosian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good, Comrade Feinstein needs to be humiliated.

2
JohnMcCainsTumors 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just send in her Chinese spy as a surrogate

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Squidproblow 2 points ago +2 / -0

What battle? Its over. Bitch, scream, cry, pull your pussy out in the road... doesnt matter. Mitch is gonna ram this justice down their throats all the way to the balls.

2
Winter_Is_Coming2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think America lost its appetite for drama during/after the Kavanagh hearings, and no one will GAFF what they pull this time

EDIT: hopefully “pull your Pussy out in the road” will catch on, Any takers next time a Karen confront someone for not wearing a mask?