309 Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. (www.justice.gov) posted 205 days ago by Suggin5 205 days ago by Suggin5 +309 / -0 9 comments share 9 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (9) sorted by: top new old worst ▲ 7 ▼ – Zadok 7 points 205 days ago +7 / -0 The members of the Idaho church should sue the fuck out of the state, county, police. permalink save report block reply ▲ 5 ▼ – KekKafir 5 points 205 days ago +5 / -0 Does all these legislaters qualified immunity supercede this? permalink save report block reply ▲ 4 ▼ – Gulleyfoyleismyname 4 points 205 days ago +4 / -0 https://thedonald.win/p/HXtNHICw/liberal-mask-cops-be-like/c/ Relevant permalink save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – Nancypelosisoldliver 3 points 205 days ago +3 / -0 Now THAT was worth clicking on if I do say so myself. Funny how the radical left is never chanting about defunding the mask nazis permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – Gulleyfoyleismyname 3 points 205 days ago +3 / -0 Thanks Pede! Glad you got the ref. It's a bit dated and the Younglings probs won't get it. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – AsscreamKing1 2 points 205 days ago +2 / -0 All administrative laws are acting under color of law. permalink save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – lash 2 points 205 days ago +3 / -1 Well, how far back do we go for this and how deep? Let's try Legal name fraud and Act of 1871 deep.. Two Constitutions whereof one is corporate legal fiction in a birth certificate name game? Yeah AG Barr is probably looking into that aaaaany minute now. permalink save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – ElegantVelociraptor 2 points 205 days ago +2 / -0 Surely "breathing freely" would fall under this, right? BoR: Right to Life. If I have a right to life, I have a right to breathe freely... ergo, no masks?? Would a "mask mandate" be understood to be "under color of any law"? permalink save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – ikuyas 2 points 205 days ago +2 / -0 What does it mean by "under color of any law"? permalink save report block reply
The members of the Idaho church should sue the fuck out of the state, county, police.
Does all these legislaters qualified immunity supercede this?
https://thedonald.win/p/HXtNHICw/liberal-mask-cops-be-like/c/
Relevant
Now THAT was worth clicking on if I do say so myself.
Funny how the radical left is never chanting about defunding the mask nazis
Thanks Pede! Glad you got the ref. It's a bit dated and the Younglings probs won't get it.
All administrative laws are acting under color of law.
Well, how far back do we go for this and how deep?
Let's try Legal name fraud and Act of 1871 deep.. Two Constitutions whereof one is corporate legal fiction in a birth certificate name game?
Yeah AG Barr is probably looking into that aaaaany minute now.
Surely "breathing freely" would fall under this, right? BoR: Right to Life. If I have a right to life, I have a right to breathe freely... ergo, no masks??
Would a "mask mandate" be understood to be "under color of any law"?
What does it mean by "under color of any law"?