I wouldn’t think so but it appears that’s the case? I’m really pretty confused about the whole thing. In fact I don’t really understand why they’d actually be liable for a civil suit at all for actions performed within the scope of their government job. Maybe if a crime is committed that goes out the window and they are liable?
So they can be insured against personal civil suits by engaging in illegal activity outside their normal government duties?!
I wouldn’t think so but it appears that’s the case? I’m really pretty confused about the whole thing. In fact I don’t really understand why they’d actually be liable for a civil suit at all for actions performed within the scope of their government job. Maybe if a crime is committed that goes out the window and they are liable?