Go read Jacobson v Massachusetts. Barrett tacitly consented to that piece of case law when she sided with Ellis who used it as "guidance" in the Illinois lockdown case.
Jacobson is scary as fuck and hadn't been used by the courts as precedent for 70+ years, and for good reason, until Ellis and Barret came along. That case law gives the government wayyy too much control over our lives. It's as bad as Wickard v Filburn and Plessy v Ferguson.
She shouldn't have ever been within a mile of concurring with Ellis just based off of Ellis's use of Jacobson. That indicates to me that she's either a statist, has a weak mind, or is close enough to either that I will not support her nomination.
They all collectively were holding out for a cancer sick 87 year old not to die so they could retain her seat, then less than a week after she dies, NOW they introduce their intentions for SCOTUS term limits. LOL. For the last four years, they were going, "hang on, Ruth! Don't die just yet!" She dies and boom they want term limits for the replacement only after they milked her for literally all she had left. They'd have had brain dead Ruth on life support with a hundred tubes sticking out of her if it meant retaining that seat.
Good luck getting a supermajority of the House, Senate, and States for this nonsense.
That's what I was thinking. To do this, it would require a Constitutional Amendment, correct?
Yeah, good luck getting 2/3rd of the House and Senate and States to approve this.
Go read Jacobson v Massachusetts. Barrett tacitly consented to that piece of case law when she sided with Ellis who used it as "guidance" in the Illinois lockdown case.
Jacobson is scary as fuck and hadn't been used by the courts as precedent for 70+ years, and for good reason, until Ellis and Barret came along. That case law gives the government wayyy too much control over our lives. It's as bad as Wickard v Filburn and Plessy v Ferguson.
She shouldn't have ever been within a mile of concurring with Ellis just based off of Ellis's use of Jacobson. That indicates to me that she's either a statist, has a weak mind, or is close enough to either that I will not support her nomination.
republicans need to add congressional limits
Pelosi after disastrous impeachment failure: “For my next action I will change the Constitution “
You can't change the Constitution with a simple bill moron.
That's not a bill, it's a constitutional amendment.
Yeah, don't laugh. They're serious about everything they do. Take them seriously at all times.
They all collectively were holding out for a cancer sick 87 year old not to die so they could retain her seat, then less than a week after she dies, NOW they introduce their intentions for SCOTUS term limits. LOL. For the last four years, they were going, "hang on, Ruth! Don't die just yet!" She dies and boom they want term limits for the replacement only after they milked her for literally all she had left. They'd have had brain dead Ruth on life support with a hundred tubes sticking out of her if it meant retaining that seat.
Only if it included term limits in the house and senate too. 3 terms in the house and one in the senate down for changing the constitution for that