5329
Comments (471)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
231
Wanderlust 231 points ago +232 / -1

Whatever happened to needing an amendment to restructure our government?

149
BIDENSACPADDICT 149 points ago +150 / -1

Pretty sure the 6:3 court will tell them to shove that bill up their ass if it somehow passes.

51
deleted 51 points ago +74 / -23
42
deleted 42 points ago +46 / -4
40
JustHereForTheSalmon 40 points ago +50 / -10

If Barrett was so good, she wouldn't need shills spamming for her.

24
deleted 24 points ago +28 / -4
1
drdespinz 1 point ago +2 / -1

He should nominate Merrick Garland just to explode their minds. It would be an olive branch they wouldn't even take

5
Former_RM2 5 points ago +5 / -0

Finally, I found the correct answer, it's just sad that I had to search so far down.

People need to read the Constitution, and they need to comprehend what it means.

The only way to institute term limits on the Supreme Court is an amendment. Without an amendment, the court will just rule any law that does it as unconstitutional,and, therefor, invalid.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
DoYouBelieveInMAGA 1 point ago +3 / -2

HASHTAG STOPSIMPING

17
Anubis1 17 points ago +19 / -2

Roberts is not on our side. When we get in Lagoa (I don't like ACB, she was for lockdowns), its 5:3:1 with Roberts choosing whatever position will get him less shit on.

2
zooty 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe we should look for a nominee willing to follow Roberts into the bathroom and give him a quick shanking.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
drdespinz 2 points ago +2 / -0

technical bullshit is their job

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
Modus_Pwninz 2 points ago +2 / -0

They won't take it up. "Conflict of interest".

Do try to keep up with the treason - it's rampant and you shoudl expect it by now!

2
RedSocks157 2 points ago +2 / -0

Should be a 9-0 decision, it's clearly written in the document lol.

12
Dictator_Bob 12 points ago +12 / -0

The republicrats hate constitutional process when it matters. Amendments were abandon for expediency. This is why we need constitutionalists back in charge. And trials for open treason. This shit has to stop.

We can absolutely amend the constitution if the people's will is strong enough.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
9
Isolated_Patriot 9 points ago +9 / -0

You don't need anything if you just do it and pretend it was legal. See: Everything that has happened in 2020.

4
NYRepublican72 4 points ago +4 / -0

Pretty sure Article III gives Federal Judges tenure for life so long as they remain in good standing.

3
TentElephant 3 points ago +3 / -0

That didn't last 10 minutes.