5329
Comments (471)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
149
BIDENSACPADDICT 149 points ago +150 / -1

Pretty sure the 6:3 court will tell them to shove that bill up their ass if it somehow passes.

51
deleted 51 points ago +74 / -23
42
deleted 42 points ago +46 / -4
40
JustHereForTheSalmon 40 points ago +50 / -10

If Barrett was so good, she wouldn't need shills spamming for her.

22
Batman 22 points ago +22 / -0

I honestly don’t know anything about her. All I know is FoxNews is pushing her. So, whatever that means...

11
TheMoreYouKnowOkay 11 points ago +17 / -6

If she was bad someone would post a link to her actual bad judgments so we can read them directly and see the full details in context.

I've been asking for this for several days, but no one has posted such a response yet.

5
Staatssicherheit 5 points ago +5 / -0

The pro-lifers love her because they think she is a solid vote to kill Roe v Wade. The mask debaters really hate her over a recent decision. The rest of us is wondering how she is on other issues. And whether she is strong enough to resist the temptation of Washington DC cocktail parties that befell so many "conservative" justices before her.

24
deleted 24 points ago +28 / -4
1
drdespinz 1 point ago +2 / -1

He should nominate Merrick Garland just to explode their minds. It would be an olive branch they wouldn't even take

5
Former_RM2 5 points ago +5 / -0

Finally, I found the correct answer, it's just sad that I had to search so far down.

People need to read the Constitution, and they need to comprehend what it means.

The only way to institute term limits on the Supreme Court is an amendment. Without an amendment, the court will just rule any law that does it as unconstitutional,and, therefor, invalid.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
DoYouBelieveInMAGA 1 point ago +3 / -2

HASHTAG STOPSIMPING

17
Anubis1 17 points ago +19 / -2

Roberts is not on our side. When we get in Lagoa (I don't like ACB, she was for lockdowns), its 5:3:1 with Roberts choosing whatever position will get him less shit on.

2
zooty 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe we should look for a nominee willing to follow Roberts into the bathroom and give him a quick shanking.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
drdespinz 2 points ago +2 / -0

technical bullshit is their job

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
drdespinz 1 point ago +1 / -0

If we impeached judges because we disagreed with their decisions politically then that would be a Bad Thing for society

2
Modus_Pwninz 2 points ago +2 / -0

They won't take it up. "Conflict of interest".

Do try to keep up with the treason - it's rampant and you shoudl expect it by now!

2
RedSocks157 2 points ago +2 / -0

Should be a 9-0 decision, it's clearly written in the document lol.