The pro-lifers love her because they think she is a solid vote to kill Roe v Wade. The mask debaters really hate her over a recent decision. The rest of us is wondering how she is on other issues. And whether she is strong enough to resist the temptation of Washington DC cocktail parties that befell so many "conservative" justices before her.
Finally, I found the correct answer, it's just sad that I had to search so far down.
People need to read the Constitution, and they need to comprehend what it means.
The only way to institute term limits on the Supreme Court is an amendment. Without an amendment, the court will just rule any law that does it as unconstitutional,and, therefor, invalid.
Roberts is not on our side. When we get in Lagoa (I don't like ACB, she was for lockdowns), its 5:3:1 with Roberts choosing whatever position will get him less shit on.
Pretty sure the 6:3 court will tell them to shove that bill up their ass if it somehow passes.
If Barrett was so good, she wouldn't need shills spamming for her.
I honestly don’t know anything about her. All I know is FoxNews is pushing her. So, whatever that means...
If she was bad someone would post a link to her actual bad judgments so we can read them directly and see the full details in context.
I've been asking for this for several days, but no one has posted such a response yet.
The pro-lifers love her because they think she is a solid vote to kill Roe v Wade. The mask debaters really hate her over a recent decision. The rest of us is wondering how she is on other issues. And whether she is strong enough to resist the temptation of Washington DC cocktail parties that befell so many "conservative" justices before her.
He should nominate Merrick Garland just to explode their minds. It would be an olive branch they wouldn't even take
Finally, I found the correct answer, it's just sad that I had to search so far down.
People need to read the Constitution, and they need to comprehend what it means.
The only way to institute term limits on the Supreme Court is an amendment. Without an amendment, the court will just rule any law that does it as unconstitutional,and, therefor, invalid.
HASHTAG STOPSIMPING
Roberts is not on our side. When we get in Lagoa (I don't like ACB, she was for lockdowns), its 5:3:1 with Roberts choosing whatever position will get him less shit on.
Maybe we should look for a nominee willing to follow Roberts into the bathroom and give him a quick shanking.
technical bullshit is their job
If we impeached judges because we disagreed with their decisions politically then that would be a Bad Thing for society
They won't take it up. "Conflict of interest".
Do try to keep up with the treason - it's rampant and you shoudl expect it by now!
Should be a 9-0 decision, it's clearly written in the document lol.