5329
Comments (471)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
29
Ghostof_PatrickHenry 29 points ago +30 / -1

I agree.

They should be lynched for Treason.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
1
Ghostof_PatrickHenry 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nooooo. We don't use that word.

you mean

LYNCH?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-31
deleted -31 points ago +9 / -40
3
Former_RM2 3 points ago +3 / -0

Go read Jacobson v Massachusetts. Barrett tacitly consented to that piece of case law when she sided with Ellis who used it as "guidance" in the Illinois lockdown case.

Jacobson is scary as fuck and hadn't been used by the courts as precedent for 70+ years, and for good reason, until Ellis and Barret came along. That case law gives the government wayyy too much control over our lives. It's as bad as Wickard v Filburn and Plessy v Ferguson.

She shouldn't have ever been within a mile of concurring with Ellis just based off of Ellis's use of Jacobson. That indicates to me that she's either a statist, has a weak mind, or is close enough to either that I will not support her nomination.

1
Only_Rosie_ODonnell 1 point ago +1 / -0

Please make a post of this

2
Former_RM2 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'll give you the cliff notes.

Jacobson was a citizen of Massachusetts. They were having a small pox pandemic in 1906. MA wanted to inoculate the population. Jacobson didn't want to be inoculated. They were going to force him. He sued. It went to the Supreme Court and the Court ruled that the government had the right to force him to get inoculated because it was in the state's interest.

Bill Gates heartily approves of this decision, and apparently, so does Barrett.

2
RussianLimbaugh 2 points ago +3 / -1

You’ve spam posted this comment on a ton of posts. I appreciate reading your points, but you should make this it’s own post & share a link to it when it’s relevant to a comment you’d like to reply to.

2
FormerGraveheart 2 points ago +2 / -0

Offtopic spam.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0