you nailed it. that dude was everywhere with that shit. i wasn’t really big on her before, but that guy made me really not like her as a pick. Trump passed on her twice. He has expanded his list. He will pick from the new bunch.
lol. how often were you spamming that? i don’t begrudge his opinion either, i just got annoyed at the fact that i kept seeing it in nearly every post i read. i feel the same way about the progressive insurance commercials. that flo lady made me never want to get progressive.
Go read Jacobson v Massachusetts. Barrett tacitly consented to that piece of case law when she sided with Ellis who used it as "guidance" in the Illinois lockdown case.
Jacobson is scary as fuck and hadn't been used by the courts as precedent for 70+ years, and for good reason, until Ellis and Barret came along. That case law gives the government wayyy too much control over our lives. It's as bad as Wickard v Filburn and Plessy v Ferguson.
She shouldn't have ever been within a mile of concurring with Ellis just based off of Ellis's use of Jacobson. That indicates to me that she's either a statist, has a weak mind, or is close enough to either that I will not support her nomination.
The Catholic church, cardinals and popes have used their religion to sexual abuse, rape, promote homosexuality, pedophilia and pederasty around the world for over 1000 years. What are your thoughts?
The Pope is called "Holy Father" but the Bible says Matthew 23:9
King James Version
9 And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven.
I just replied to every post like that of his he did today (must have been a hundred) with the following:
Go read Jacobson v Massachusetts. Barrett tacitly consented to that piece of case law when she sided with Ellis who used it as "guidance" in the Illinois lockdown case.
Jacobson is scary as fuck and hadn't been used by the courts as precedent for 70+ years, and for good reason, until Ellis and Barret came along. That case law gives the government wayyy too much control over our lives. It's as bad as Wickard v Filburn and Plessy v Ferguson.
She shouldn't have ever been within a mile of concurring with Ellis just based off of Ellis's use of Jacobson. That indicates to me that she's either a statist, has a weak mind, or is close enough to either that I will not support her nomination.
LOL
you nailed it. that dude was everywhere with that shit. i wasn’t really big on her before, but that guy made me really not like her as a pick. Trump passed on her twice. He has expanded his list. He will pick from the new bunch.
I don't begrudge him his opinion one bit, I like that he comes out swinging for his gal ACB!
I myself am not a fan and was spamming this https://humanevents.com/2019/09/19/amy-coney-barrett-is-not-a-safe-pick-for-the-supreme-court/ back the LAST time she was under consideration and we were on reddit lolll
lol. how often were you spamming that? i don’t begrudge his opinion either, i just got annoyed at the fact that i kept seeing it in nearly every post i read. i feel the same way about the progressive insurance commercials. that flo lady made me never want to get progressive.
That dude annoyed me so much he motivated me to write my own Selenium bot to follow him around and call him a spam warrior. u/Qurans_Little_Helper
It was rightfully banned within a few hours lol. Couldn't stand that guy.
Go read Jacobson v Massachusetts. Barrett tacitly consented to that piece of case law when she sided with Ellis who used it as "guidance" in the Illinois lockdown case.
Jacobson is scary as fuck and hadn't been used by the courts as precedent for 70+ years, and for good reason, until Ellis and Barret came along. That case law gives the government wayyy too much control over our lives. It's as bad as Wickard v Filburn and Plessy v Ferguson.
She shouldn't have ever been within a mile of concurring with Ellis just based off of Ellis's use of Jacobson. That indicates to me that she's either a statist, has a weak mind, or is close enough to either that I will not support her nomination.
KYAAA, SENPAI NOTICED ME!
The Catholic church, cardinals and popes have used their religion to sexual abuse, rape, promote homosexuality, pedophilia and pederasty around the world for over 1000 years. What are your thoughts?
The Pope is called "Holy Father" but the Bible says Matthew 23:9 King James Version 9 And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven.
Heh. Okay, I get your argument, and great meme for it. But can we keep personal beefs out of posts? You can block :)
No beef, I appreciate his zeal tbh
Had my problems with him at first. Eventually he stopped calling anyone with a slightly different opinion a cuck. It's an improvement.
I just replied to every post like that of his he did today (must have been a hundred) with the following: