3610
SCOTUS ANNOUNCEMENT INCOMING (media.patriots.win)
posted ago by SonomaGA ago by SonomaGA +3610 / -0
Comments (114)
sorted by:
56
deleted 56 points ago +56 / -0
28
deleted 28 points ago +28 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
20
BishopofBlackpool 20 points ago +20 / -0

I hope it's a man, as they wouldn't have made any signs.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
1
Brucesky420 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't know if that's going to happen this time because it's pretty much a lock for ACB. Maybe I'm wrong, I certainly wouldn't be mad about more emails going out saying "We must reject <insert justice's name here>" to help show the country the left was ready to reject literally anyone he nominated

43
Red_Fox 43 points ago +46 / -3

Gotta overturn roe v wade

32
deleted 32 points ago +33 / -1
11
Patriot6969 11 points ago +23 / -12

touching abortion will ensure democrat victory, unfortunately. I personally care way more about my freedom as a citizen than I do about liberals killing their own babies.

21
Nastyfication 21 points ago +22 / -1

This is a winning issue for Republicans. Almost every Christian I know is voting for Trump explicitly because he is pro-life.

2
Patriot6969 2 points ago +2 / -0

this is why conservatives continue to lose nationally. Every generation of young people is less religious by traditional standards. They want to have sex because thats how young people are. They want to be able to do away with potential consequences to that, legally. They dont agree that its murder. Im sorry but i am not prepared to throw out my freedom as a citizen because christians are obsessed with other peoples moral choices.

3
Eric-CIA-ramella 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yup, pedes here are unfortunately ignorant of the degeneracy of normies outside their virtuous convictions. I'm a Christian and agree with the evil that is abortion, in addition to the overreach of state power that Roe vs Wade violated...but, in the eyes of a brainwashed youth that will only be the majority years from now, I know they will vote against the party that repeals it, 180%.

My body, my right! is the liberty-attached message injected into the masses that have been hypnotized by Twitter, TikTok, Facebook, Instagram for the last 8 years. Silicon Valley and media have also done an excellent Soviet-esque job of silencing, censoring, removing and shadow banning any anti-abortion imagery that is actually an effective counter point (leaked Planned Parenthood vids, fetus disassembly footage, fetus remains, etc). They've covered their bases and in response the Overton window on abortion has shifted almost permanently to the left as the majority opinion.

Almost every Christian I know is voting for Trump explicitly because he is pro-life.

To further prove my point, Christians make up how much of the U.S. voting population? Less and less each year, by design, so it's not a solid issue whatsoever to bank an entire campaign on. The economy is lightyears better to advertise on.

2
Patriot6969 2 points ago +2 / -0

well said, 100% agree.

1
Nastyfication 1 point ago +2 / -1

So we should move away from what is right, just because the demographic isn't the largest voting block?

2
Eric-CIA-ramella 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trump knows how to win - do you think he won by intentionally alienating a needles voter base? Yet another fault with conservatives is exactly what you're displaying now: being virtuous in politics, successfully. The two cant exist if that wasnt obvious from the last 50 years.

2
Nastyfication 2 points ago +2 / -0

Abortion is a human rights issue, not just a Christian issue. It the most important issue facing society today, bar none.

1
Patriot6969 1 point ago +1 / -0

That might be the most ignorant statement i have ever read on this site or from any conservative. You are truly delusional if you think that. When the dems virtually eliminate the constitution due to abortion self righteousness maybe you will learn, but i doubt it. The amount of 'privilege' to use a leftist term, that you must have to believe the biggest threat to the country is a choice that someone else makes that doesnt affect you is a level of privilege i have never known. So congrats on that ultra comfortable quality of life.

2
Nastyfication 2 points ago +2 / -0

What is that choice? They aren't choosing to get a vanilla ice cream cone or a chocolate one. They are choosing whether or not to rip a baby apart limb from limb.

7
deleted 7 points ago +9 / -2
1
Patriot6969 1 point ago +1 / -0

Your obsession with liberals killing their own babies will ensure a dem victory that will not only expand abortion rights but implement far worse things than liberals thinning their own numbers. Be self righteous all you want, when the constitution is gutted due to "muh roe v wade" will you be happy then, tool?

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
Patriot6969 0 points ago +1 / -1

fuck off faggot. ignorant dweeb.

3
Chaotikizm 3 points ago +5 / -2

They can kill babies in some other country then.

1
Patriot6969 1 point ago +1 / -0

Theyre gonna win if we touch current abortion laws. Then they will end all restrictions on abortions. How do you people not understand this

2
BeefyBelisarius 2 points ago +2 / -0

Overturning Roe would just return abortion to being a state issue. Driving to the nearest blue state would still be an option.

1
Patriot6969 1 point ago +1 / -0

No it would galvanize the left and ensure we lose. Then things much worse than abortion will be implemented. I guesa we all have to learn the hard way?

1
BeefyBelisarius 1 point ago +1 / -0

Things much worse than murdering millions of children?

1
Patriot6969 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, way worse. My personal freedom as a citizen under the constitution is 100000000% more important than other people killing their babies, themselves, or poverty/genocide over sees, etc.. yes. The answer to your question is yes.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +10 / -12
1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
10
Flipbarryfromreddit 10 points ago +11 / -1

Yep!!! It was created on a lie too!

6
Italians_Invented_2A 6 points ago +9 / -3

I'm pro-choice and I want R v W overturned because I hate the fact that leftists legislate from the bench.

2
Azith42 2 points ago +2 / -0

There you go, bringing intelligence into the abortion debate. You know thats sexist and racist and Nazist (per CNN).

4
Italians_Invented_2A 4 points ago +5 / -1

Not a chance. There's no Justice that openly said they'd consider it.

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
2
Italians_Invented_2A 2 points ago +4 / -2

Exactly. She's a Marxist and probably a Democrat plant .

2
flashersenpai 2 points ago +3 / -1

You realize that's not going to make abortion illegal, right?

5
AlphaNathan 5 points ago +5 / -0

Think everyone knows that. What's your point?

2
flashersenpai 2 points ago +2 / -0

There's way more opportunities at the state level and I wouldn't torpedo a nomination because they don't have a clear position on the issue. Nor is any statement related to Roe an indication of how they'll vote given that conservatives such dick at picking justices.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
15
AlphaNathan 15 points ago +16 / -1

Can it not be a woman?

29
KiTA 29 points ago +29 / -0

Probably not. IdPol reasons. You can only always go less straight/white/male/christian, never more.

9
Italians_Invented_2A 9 points ago +11 / -2

The mob that attacked Kav had the last laugh.

10
TheImpossible1 10 points ago +10 / -0

I said back then that the reason for that charade was to make sure that men don't get put forward for the SCOTUS again... They knew Kavanaugh would get confirmed either way.

4
Italians_Invented_2A 4 points ago +4 / -0

Exactly.

It's also to reduce the pool of new possible candidates, regardless of gender, because not everyone will want the job now.

3
Granny 3 points ago +4 / -1

Are we certain that no men were considered? I mean we've known for years that ACB was a top candidate. Just because Geotus announced that it's a woman, doesn't mean no men were considered.

Edit: I mean let's not stigmatize her as a token if she's not.

3
flashersenpai 3 points ago +4 / -1

Was she though? All people said about her until this week was that she had a lot of kids and was religious.

That's a hell of a low bar for a "top candidate."

1
Granny 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think you may have missed all the "for no particular reason" posts....

25
Loc12 25 points ago +25 / -0

Yeah, I hate that only women are being considered. Gave Joe so much shit for only picking women for VP , then we go and do the same thing

Yeah there are advantages to it right now, Dems can attack a woman less, swing voters will like it and be more inclined to vote Trump. But it's identity politics, no more and no less

9
deleted 9 points ago +12 / -3
8
Loc12 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yeah, I absolutely get why he's doing it. Just one of those things where we have to start fighting fire with fire I guess

7
DrCowboyPresident 7 points ago +7 / -0

Problem is, a woman ALWAYS has to be replaced by a woman. Down the line, the remaining men gradually get replaced.

We'll eventually be living in a gynocracy

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
Loc12 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, again I get what she's doing and why, but her ads are literally just for blacks. If you're white and living in Baltimore you might as well not exist

4
flashersenpai 4 points ago +4 / -0

You mean might as well move? The murder rate is absurd there.

2
HunterBidenCokeStraw 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well black people in the Baltimore slums are her main constituency.

1
DrCowboyPresident 1 point ago +1 / -0

but is race pandering.

Identity politics is a fact of life in a fractured society.

11
J_Dubya_C 11 points ago +11 / -0

Having it be a woman is fine with me as long as they are QUALIFIED.

13
Italians_Invented_2A 13 points ago +13 / -0

It's not about choosing a female candidate. It's about first choosing that it's a female, and then looking for a suitable candidate among that 1 gender.

5
deleted 5 points ago +7 / -2
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
LuisH 2 points ago +2 / -0

I wish not.

1
HowDidWeGetHere 1 point ago +1 / -0

From an election standpoint there is a real tangible benefit to it being a woman. We know the candidate will be hit by the DNC war machine so having them slander a woman this close to the election will 100% sway moderate woman votes away from the dems.

15
Rainman 15 points ago +15 / -0

Apparently Manchin said he will vote no yet he hasn't seen the candidate saying "you have to stand for something." Guess he stands for the swamp

15
thefeebleguy 15 points ago +15 / -0

as someone from WV, Manchin is very hated in the state.

He is an establishment croney, who betrayed west virginians

6
DrCowboyPresident 6 points ago +6 / -0

And yet he always gets elected.

3
thefeebleguy 3 points ago +3 / -0

sigh..... right

13
RenaissanceOfHope 13 points ago +13 / -0

Well if it’s ACB I will be contributing to the salt pile.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
3
RenaissanceOfHope 3 points ago +3 / -0

If she gets it, we need to fight it way harder than the left fought Kavanaugh- except we stick solely to her judicial philosophy, avoid false accusations, avoid digging up dirt from long ago, and have her family be off limits (although I am concerned that she will rule the wrong way on immigration because of her adopted kids from Haiti).

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
Brucesky420 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fuck that, ACB is far better than any justice Biden would ever pick. You fight against ACB, you're risking the supreme court for a decade if not more. They're going to do everything they can to cheat in this election, especially if that seat is open

3
meals23 3 points ago +3 / -0

yeah, she's a Neo-Con. Gorsuch and Kavanaugh have been mostly ok but they have cucked out on a few key rulings that show they were both neo-cons

I told people months ago and I'm saying it again now, we don't need Judge Amy Barrett to replace Ginbsurg. We need Judge Dredd.

4
RenaissanceOfHope 4 points ago +5 / -1

I like Gorsuch but I was not happy about Kavanaugh. When I Kavanaugh was picked, I was stupid enough to want ACB that time until another Pede told me about the adoptions and I started digging further into her judicial philosophy.

  • Gorsuch gets an A- so far (he sucks on immigration but he was great with the Bostock decision).
  • Kavanaugh gets like a B or C.
  • ACB would get like a F (possibly an F- but that is reserved for someone who never makes the right ruling OR RBG who said she liked South Africa’s constitution better than ours-that’s automatic disqualification).
9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
9
Surfsup 9 points ago +9 / -0

The scotus nominee should not be affected by gender. It should be the best qualified judge who makes decisions based on the law and constitution, not their feelings.

Additionally, the reason they are appointed for life is to take away any potential influence they might feel to lose their seat should they make a decision that is not popular. By being installed for life, they are free to decide on issues without fear of losing their scotus position. To do the right thing, rather than the popular thing.

5
Flipbarryfromreddit 5 points ago +5 / -0

Can’t wait for the salt. The announcement will be amazing! This will be incredible

5
Dckman 5 points ago +5 / -0

We're gonna need MORE. MORE. MORE!

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
3
Goldlight 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm betting it's lagoa but maybe that's the most obvious bet of all time (after the miami rally)

if I'm wrong oh well

3
Italians_Invented_2A 3 points ago +3 / -0

He's meeting Lagoa today, and he met Barret last Monday.

Maybe this suggests that he's picking Lagoa. Finger crossed (although I'd prefer someone else)

2
Goldlight 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe they can get rushing through

3
Goldlight 3 points ago +3 / -0

I really wish roberts would retire as well so we get 4

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
cob05 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ugh, I would hate to lose Thomas though. He would need to be replaced with an exact clone who is younger. Can't risk replacing him with someone who even slightly leans left.

1
Goldlight 1 point ago +1 / -0

right, I forgot how old he is

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
flashersenpai 2 points ago +2 / -0

You're going to compete with local salt sources as well people are mixed on the barrett/lagoa question

Or maybe rushing out of nowhere with the steel chair

2
macrolinx 2 points ago +2 / -0

The salt will flow like the Spice from planet Arrakis.

2
DinosRFake 2 points ago +2 / -0

Aren't they going to burn it all down and shit?

Promises promises. But nah, there relentless weaseling has been pretty effective, they'll carry on.

Personally I hope he gives the job to a white guy. But they can't.

2
Azith42 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't think its going to be barret. i know a lot of people here like her, but last time he did his pick, he did something similar by going to talk to a completely different judge than Kavenaugh to throw off the press. I'm betting on the Hispanic lady.

2
Grond999 2 points ago +2 / -0

Amy Coney Barrett will replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg: John Jordan.

Announcement on Sky News Australia: https://youtu.be/ArB4ftn-Iew (time stamped)

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
2
Grond999 2 points ago +2 / -0

She will betray.

Anything specific that she will betray on? in your opinion.

3
flashersenpai 3 points ago +3 / -0

Former Intel cites "sources"

maybe it's true, but come on

1
CentipedeDemon 1 point ago +1 / -0

Remember when The Donald mailed the New York Times literal tons of salt? Good times!

1
goodatlife123 1 point ago +1 / -0

Allison Rushing

1
h3xAd3c1m4L 1 point ago +1 / -0

May the salt of their tears give us strength. Praise KEK! 😪💦☕️👌🏻

1
ArcticDark 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dems are already mobilizing over 10m$ to fight it. They don't even know who it is, and they already have the Barret signs printed from Kavanaugh, if he picks her. They don't care.

1
deleted 1 point ago +4 / -3
-1
hilboggins -1 points ago +1 / -2

Oh that Keks out

-1
chanel_rions_hairgel -1 points ago +1 / -2

ACB has a consistent conservative record. Lagoa is a complete question mark on every issue but politically would help Trump in the election. Democrats going after Lagoa would anger the Hispanic community in the entire nation.

5
RunningBuffalo 5 points ago +5 / -0

Democrats going after ACB will help Trump with old school white Catholic Democrats in WI, MI, and PA. He needs gains in that group more than he needs gains among Hispanics. He'll win FL with or without a Lagoa nomination.

2
HRoark 2 points ago +2 / -0

Idk she doesn't give me the blue collar vibe that would help with this group. I think acb would turn off moderate women and lagoa would just be safer them in geberal and but the dems on the spot for hating even one of their treasure "poc" groups. Also it's not just Florida, Latinos are everywhere.

2
flashersenpai 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lagoa has been a judge for over 10 years. The fact that you haven't heard anything about her means she isn't be pushed by establishment and normies

3
chanel_rions_hairgel 3 points ago +3 / -0

I just don't want a Sandra Day O'connor part 2