They won't... even at gun point these commies would rather choose the bullet. I know from expirience that you can turn a commie into a capitalist, but never one of the aggitators. Once trump has his 2nd term, maybe we'll see the end of Obamas propaganda ammendment to the Smith–Mundt Act of 1948. Than we can prosecute these traitors.
Trump needs to go after lobbyists and term limits in his second term. That's pure second term material. If he can get lobby reform, that would go a long way. And more transparent and stringent campaign finance and donation laws, with stiffer oversight, and firm, in the law limits on cash raising, the money thrown at campaigns has to stop.
That all hinges on taking Congress. Iffy, at best. The next 4 years are gonna be more of the same - constant political warfare.
The Sun neither comes up nor goes down since the Earth is a spinning sphere so we see different areas of the sky. As such, orange man bad, lemme fuck this prostitute while my wife is somewhere else.
A tribe in Bungladeshumu worships the sun as Pilokitoka Lamitanarunoka, god of fire and blindness. Their dogma claims that one day, Pilokitoka Lamitanarunoka (praised be his name) will not rise, and this will signify the end of days as he sweeps through the world engaging in staring contests with all the ignorant heathens that have denounced him, who totally deserve to be burned alive for their whiteness. This seems entirely reasonable to us, and in fact we wonder why it hasn't happened yet.
This is also potentially confirmed by the lesser known and less respected cult of Christian mythology, which claims that in the end of days some sort of revelation might occur, and the sun will freeze in the heavens. Of course, nobody takes Christianity seriously, but it is interesting to note that their likely plagiarized claims are almost a perfect match, subjectively speaking, for Bungladeshumuian Pilokitoka Lamitanarunokatism, which is a real religion.
No, Blake WAS convicted of sexual assault when he touched that girl against her will. All Snopes does is lie and twist shit to fit their view and the people lap it up.
These are just democrat organizations that label themselves as "fact checkers", anyone can do it. Democrats were just smart enough to do it and pretend they're impartial, when they're practically campaign workers
Well they even say he was convicted of 3rd degree sexual assault. I don’t really know what third degree sexual assault means, but it sounds a lot like sexual assault to me.
That's pretty much how all the "fact-checkers" answer everything. Tim Pool even talked about how one of Facebook's fact-checks added extra context to a post of his so they could mark it false.
Snopes got famous for putting the alt.folklore.urban FAQ on the web. Nothing wrong with that but he gained his legitimacy from the work of others and it's been misused since.
The "fact check" on Susan Rosenberg of BLM is probably worse: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/blm-terrorist-rosenberg/
"The definition of terrorism is unclear! Does having a car full of explosives really make a person a terrorist?"
"In the absence of a single, universally-agreed definition of "terrorism," it is a matter of subjective determination as to whether the actions for which Rosenberg was convicted and imprisoned — possession of weapons and hundreds of pounds of explosives — should be described as acts of "domestic terrorism.""
This sounds like a sentence straight out of Babylon Bee. It's even written like a joke with a punchline and everything. Jesus Christ
How exactly did Snopes rise to the top of Internet fact-checking? I realize now that one day many years ago, nearly everyone interested in Internet culture suddenly began turning to this particular site to verify information, and whatever Snopes said was the "truth."
Snopes got famous for putting the alt.folklore.urban FAQ (I was there when he was a newb) on the web. Nothing wrong with that but he gained his legitimacy from the work of others and it's been misused since.
Ah I see where you got confused. They’re immediately rapists at the time of the accusation without a trial or evidence unless they can help the left politically. Then they magically turn into dindus
When you’re a dindu things like a clean record or decent credit score don’t matter. If anyone says anything about it or denies you something because of them, you can just scream racist and people give you millions of dollars on gofundme. It’s the perfect grift.
Did an FBI Report Conclude That None of the Allegations Against Brett Kavanaugh Was True?
Mostly False
What's True
According to a Senate Judiciary Committee synopsis, the FBI's October 2018 investigation into sexual assault allegations against Brett Kavanaugh did not find any evidence to corroborate or substantiate those claims.
What's False
The FBI did not report that all (or any) of the allegations against Kavanaugh were conclusively determined to be false.
Why don't they say Kavanaugh was "Not tried or convicted of sexual assault" anywhere?
You think that's bad? Look up the snopes about Biden claiming 120 million have died from coronavirus.
They called it mostly false and in their correction they wrote that he actually said more than 120 million died but that he corrected himself to 120 million AFTERWARDS.
Did we spend 100 billion trillion million? Well, no that would be physically impossible but 100 billion trillion million is actually a real number arithmetically so partially true.
Does Joe Biden understand math and numbers? Well clearly not at an elementary school level but he does say actual numbers so yes, Joe Biden understands math and numbers even if he has to point the decimal places in the air with his forefinger while he talks.
Hey we all make mistakes. I was once a far lefty myself and I cringe at the things I said, believed, and did. I found God, grew up, and things changed and have continued to change for me. All can be forgiven but you should probably forgive yourself a bit too. If you have the character to admit wrong doing/think and regret it then you are a decent sort and have a decent future ahead of you. We have the best former libs.
Remember that according to the left this man represents the best of the black community and he and other violent rapists should be protected at all costs, even if it means they get to resist and evade arrest and go on to rape some more. They are unable to find a better person to supposedly represent all black people than this fellow, which should tell you everything you need to know about the people chimping out over this.
if theyre ok with accusing a supreme court justice of fucking GANG RAPE, then apply the same standard to an actual rapist. doesnt matter if he was convicted or not
Snopes always does this to things they can’t directly debunk through lies... throw in some innocuous fact that they can attempt to dismiss the whole thing through
That's how they manipulate people into lies. They basically fact check something that wasn't said and then claim it's false. Unfortunately the other side is filled with NPCs so they believe all this crap from Snopes and Politifact.
"Blake has not been convicted of sexual assault." lol. But he knew he would be which is why he fought with the cops and got his thug as shot. Now he's handcuffed to a hospital bed awaiting trial and definite conviction. If she's proud of him then I guess she really is black?
'Who a meme claimed "raped a woman".' Ah, so the victim is a meme, got it.
"Claim: U.S. Sen. Kamala Harris has said she believes women who have accused former Vice President Joe Biden of various offenses, ranging from inappropriate touching to rape."
"What's True: On April 2, 2019, Harris said "I believe them," in reference to four women who had by then accused Biden of inappropriate touching.
What's False: Harris has not said that she believes all of Biden's accusers, in particular Tara Reade, who, almost one year after Harris' remarks, accused Biden of raping her. When questioned about Reade's allegations, Harris did not say that she believed them."
Claim: Blake sexually assaulted a woman, and Kamala said she was proud of him afterwards.
Verdict: While it's true that Blake has been charged with sexually assaulting a woman, and Kamala DID say she was proud of him after that fact, Blake has not yet been convicted of the sexual assault charge, so we rate this claim a mixture of true and false.
So throw something related to the initial claim but that’s clearly false so you can soften the blow of the real claim. These tactics should be studied.
In all seriousness, I've seen this work first-hand on some of the politically uninitiated. Even after the explanation, they still fall for this kind of shit.
Yeah, welcome to 1984. The Ministry of Truth aka Snopes IS NOT TO BE QUESTIONED! Honk
Election meddling! Just imagine if they gave Trump this nice of a treatment
They won't... even at gun point these commies would rather choose the bullet. I know from expirience that you can turn a commie into a capitalist, but never one of the aggitators. Once trump has his 2nd term, maybe we'll see the end of Obamas propaganda ammendment to the Smith–Mundt Act of 1948. Than we can prosecute these traitors.
You seemed to have turned off your spell check highlighting, lol!
The red wiggly lines add emphasis.
Trump needs to go after lobbyists and term limits in his second term. That's pure second term material. If he can get lobby reform, that would go a long way. And more transparent and stringent campaign finance and donation laws, with stiffer oversight, and firm, in the law limits on cash raising, the money thrown at campaigns has to stop.
That all hinges on taking Congress. Iffy, at best. The next 4 years are gonna be more of the same - constant political warfare.
Once the comment is posted, they're turned off for everyone but Spelnahtzees like us :)
Snopes needs the Social Media treatment - charged for false advertisement.
Social Media are private, politiical platforms - not free, public services under protection of Free Speech.
Snopes is a private, political platform, like the "Patriot Act", with the promise of "Fact Checking". We need liability.
Yelling fire in a crowded theater is explicitly legal.
The Schneck ruling was overturned by brandenburg v ohio.
Yes.
Already is legal. Just call it journalism.
But they do agree with him.
Yelling fire in a crowded theater is explicitly protected under Brandenburg v. Ohio.
All your links have nothing to do with it.
You are trying to make a slippery slope argument, but things can't slide when they are all rigidly defined by supreme court cases.
Remember when Hillary said that the lesson to be learned from 1984 is that we should all trust people in authority ?
They use it as a playbook vice a warning.
wait, what?
yep. She actually did. it blew my mind
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/sep/14/hillary-clinton-lesson-1984-trust-leaders-press/
I am sorry if this happens to be a satire, but doesn't seem so. Behind paywall so havent been able to read fully.
"The sun will come up tomorrow."
Rating: Mixed.
What's false:
The Sun neither comes up nor goes down since the Earth is a spinning sphere so we see different areas of the sky. As such, orange man bad, lemme fuck this prostitute while my wife is somewhere else.
CORRECTION: “it is correct to say the sun rises, yet it has not happened yet for tomorrow.”
Rating: MOSTLY FALSE.
"The sun will come up tomorrow."
A tribe in Bungladeshumu worships the sun as Pilokitoka Lamitanarunoka, god of fire and blindness. Their dogma claims that one day, Pilokitoka Lamitanarunoka (praised be his name) will not rise, and this will signify the end of days as he sweeps through the world engaging in staring contests with all the ignorant heathens that have denounced him, who totally deserve to be burned alive for their whiteness. This seems entirely reasonable to us, and in fact we wonder why it hasn't happened yet.
This is also potentially confirmed by the lesser known and less respected cult of Christian mythology, which claims that in the end of days some sort of revelation might occur, and the sun will freeze in the heavens. Of course, nobody takes Christianity seriously, but it is interesting to note that their likely plagiarized claims are almost a perfect match, subjectively speaking, for Bungladeshumuian Pilokitoka Lamitanarunokatism, which is a real religion.
Rating: FALSE.
You can't just honk!
Honk Vroom
Is 2+2=4?
2 + 2 is 4 but there are unsubstantiated claims that this formula contains a negative 3.
Conclusion: Mixed
No, Blake WAS convicted of sexual assault when he touched that girl against her will. All Snopes does is lie and twist shit to fit their view and the people lap it up.
These are just democrat organizations that label themselves as "fact checkers", anyone can do it. Democrats were just smart enough to do it and pretend they're impartial, when they're practically campaign workers
I can always tell when an organization is full of partisan hacks when they label themselves “non-partisan”.
They align themselves between the one party.
Most conservatives are busy. Working a career, raising a family, having hobbies that aren't wasting all day on the internet.
Well they even say he was convicted of 3rd degree sexual assault. I don’t really know what third degree sexual assault means, but it sounds a lot like sexual assault to me.
Was Blake convicted of sexual assault?
Fact check: False.
Blake was just inappropriately touching a girl against her will.
Spez: Hahaha can’t make this up: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/09/03/fact-check-jacob-blake-sex-assault-charge-tied-woman-not-child/5700351002/
KEK unbelievable!!
I thought he was out on bail. He had a protection order, but that is not the same as being convicted.
Q: Did Kamala say she was proud of Blake?
A: He has not been tried and/or convicted of rape at this time, only charged.
///what?
Q: Is Bill Clinton a rapist?
A: Mixture. Yes. Also yes, but with extra unnecessary context.
infowars.com
That's pretty much how all the "fact-checkers" answer everything. Tim Pool even talked about how one of Facebook's fact-checks added extra context to a post of his so they could mark it false.
Is Snopes a valid Factchecker?
Mixture: they tell half-truths.
They make their own truths. A third category. A Snopism.
A: That depends on what "is" is.
Snopes got famous for putting the alt.folklore.urban FAQ on the web. Nothing wrong with that but he gained his legitimacy from the work of others and it's been misused since.
Snopes is not a fact checking organization, it's one guy and his wife running a shitty website.
Who fact checks the Fact Checkers?
Send this to Tim Pool. He always says this is exactly what they do, and this has got to be the most blatant example of it I have ever seen.
The "fact check" on Susan Rosenberg of BLM is probably worse: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/blm-terrorist-rosenberg/ "The definition of terrorism is unclear! Does having a car full of explosives really make a person a terrorist?"
What the actual fuck??!!
"In the absence of a single, universally-agreed definition of "terrorism," it is a matter of subjective determination as to whether the actions for which Rosenberg was convicted and imprisoned — possession of weapons and hundreds of pounds of explosives — should be described as acts of "domestic terrorism.""
This sounds like a sentence straight out of Babylon Bee. It's even written like a joke with a punchline and everything. Jesus Christ
I want off this ride.
The ride never ends HAHA!!!
I mean, technically no, but...
How exactly did Snopes rise to the top of Internet fact-checking? I realize now that one day many years ago, nearly everyone interested in Internet culture suddenly began turning to this particular site to verify information, and whatever Snopes said was the "truth."
It used to be relatively apolitical. I remember Snopes was the go-to like a decade ago for fact checking random urban legends and memes.
This - first mover advantage.
Actually not true. Before the web, there was Usenet.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.folklore.urban/c/Rg2kaLV58nQ?pli=1
I was a regular reader when Snopes joined in.
A giant pile of money to go along with a giant propaganda push.
Snopes got famous for putting the alt.folklore.urban FAQ (I was there when he was a newb) on the web. Nothing wrong with that but he gained his legitimacy from the work of others and it's been misused since.
Oooh so now you have to be convicted of rape? I thought you can just accuse someone and they must immediately be cancelled?!
Ah I see where you got confused. They’re immediately rapists at the time of the accusation without a trial or evidence unless they can help the left politically. Then they magically turn into dindus
When you’re a dindu things like a clean record or decent credit score don’t matter. If anyone says anything about it or denies you something because of them, you can just scream racist and people give you millions of dollars on gofundme. It’s the perfect grift.
That's only for conservatives.
Literally also Snopes:
Mostly False
Why don't they say Kavanaugh was "Not tried or convicted of sexual assault" anywhere?
Snopes is asking for the FBI to prove a negative and thinks the burden of proof is on the accused.
Typical liberals
Believe all women though.
Except Tara Reade, don't listen to that bitch ever!
By what standards? The legal standards? The believe all women standards? I can't keep track of all this.
You think that's bad? Look up the snopes about Biden claiming 120 million have died from coronavirus.
They called it mostly false and in their correction they wrote that he actually said more than 120 million died but that he corrected himself to 120 million AFTERWARDS.
Did we spend 100 billion trillion million? Well, no that would be physically impossible but 100 billion trillion million is actually a real number arithmetically so partially true.
Does Joe Biden understand math and numbers? Well clearly not at an elementary school level but he does say actual numbers so yes, Joe Biden understands math and numbers even if he has to point the decimal places in the air with his forefinger while he talks.
That one might be one of their worst if it isn't THE worst.
Clown Logic
I'm so embarrassed that I used to believe them! I was the baddie!
Hey we all make mistakes. I was once a far lefty myself and I cringe at the things I said, believed, and did. I found God, grew up, and things changed and have continued to change for me. All can be forgiven but you should probably forgive yourself a bit too. If you have the character to admit wrong doing/think and regret it then you are a decent sort and have a decent future ahead of you. We have the best former libs.
Not anymore, fren!
They were useful for urban myths way back. Stuff like: “do you swallow seven spiders in your sleep during your lifetime?”
I don’t ever remember taking their politics seriously, they never seemed correct.
The definition of fake news!!!!!! Fuck Snopes!
Snopes' target audience, the 70 IQ community, isn't seeing the problem.
Honk honk
Snopes wipes their ass and says it smells like toilet paper.
Look at all that brown glop. Ghost wipe for sure.
"Well yes, but actually no."
Remember that according to the left this man represents the best of the black community and he and other violent rapists should be protected at all costs, even if it means they get to resist and evade arrest and go on to rape some more. They are unable to find a better person to supposedly represent all black people than this fellow, which should tell you everything you need to know about the people chimping out over this.
Did Kamala Harris suck off her bosses like a perpetual motion machine?
False: that violates the second law of thermodynamics
Dems have always been the party of subjective interpretation.
There needs to be an archive of all the snopes lies over the years.
🔴 - Here's a medal for having informative post for red pulling the masses. https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8Sf5hAm/newest-medal-for-all-of-you-pede/c/
if theyre ok with accusing a supreme court justice of fucking GANG RAPE, then apply the same standard to an actual rapist. doesnt matter if he was convicted or not
Has not been convicted..... yet.
She just wishes she had been there to watch the rape... so "mixture" is an accurate fact check.
In a paradox of sorts, It's kind of amazing that they are honest enough to spell out their dishonesty if you read enough.
Do this more, I am sending this to all my idiot friends who thinks scopes is legit.
Snopes always does this to things they can’t directly debunk through lies... throw in some innocuous fact that they can attempt to dismiss the whole thing through
We need more of these. Lots more.
That's how they manipulate people into lies. They basically fact check something that wasn't said and then claim it's false. Unfortunately the other side is filled with NPCs so they believe all this crap from Snopes and Politifact.
One the one about Trump blocking certain classes of visa like Carter did, they said it was false because the intent was different.
I can't believe the guy was willing to cash in his integrity like this.
Snopes is Pure Shit.
Try a Magic 8 Ball for more accuracy.
This is common knowledge lol, but it's still good to repeat for the people in that hadn't heard.
My favorite one and go-to from Snopes has been the Nathan Philips (Covington) "Vietnam war vet" claims.
He was never in Vietnam, but claimed (on video) that he was a 'Nam war vet... then called out by everyone, and eventually by Cernovich himself.
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189254423664582663
To this day it remains "unproven."
So ridiculous
"Blake has not been convicted of sexual assault." lol. But he knew he would be which is why he fought with the cops and got his thug as shot. Now he's handcuffed to a hospital bed awaiting trial and definite conviction. If she's proud of him then I guess she really is black?
'Who a meme claimed "raped a woman".' Ah, so the victim is a meme, got it.
The one where they debunk her saying she believes Joe Biden's accusers is even better.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/harris-believe-biden-accusers/
They're weasels, and they're fucking bad at it.
PSA: A "meme" did not claim Jacob Blake raped a woman. The woman who filed the charges claimed he raped her. See how that works?
Claim: Blake sexually assaulted a woman, and Kamala said she was proud of him afterwards.
Verdict: While it's true that Blake has been charged with sexually assaulting a woman, and Kamala DID say she was proud of him after that fact, Blake has not yet been convicted of the sexual assault charge, so we rate this claim a mixture of true and false.
I guess #MeToo and #BelieveWomen is over, guys.
So throw something related to the initial claim but that’s clearly false so you can soften the blow of the real claim. These tactics should be studied.
Yes, Snopes is bullshit, and in other news water is wet.
In all seriousness, I've seen this work first-hand on some of the politically uninitiated. Even after the explanation, they still fall for this kind of shit.
It's genuinely dismaying.
hahaha YEP!. They use that tactic for almost everything. They are as bad as ANY fake news out there.
did the banana gobbler go visit any wounded officers? no? ok then. i really hope every single police officer and their friends and families vote trump