Why else would someone non chalantly and with determination, expell the prejudice idea that their skin color is what makes them innately superior? The whacky part is that their philosophy of projection is so well embedded in their thoughts that they actually paint targets on their own heads in an attempt to justify the finger pointing they do screaming that we're responsible for their own self hatred.
Think of it this way. You go walking in the woods and do a threat assessment. The greatest "threats" on your radar are the wolf and the bear. The bear is deemed the greatest threat, but it is in the middle of January and all of the bears are hibernating. In this case the bear would still be the greater "Threat" but the wolf, being active, would easily be the greater "Risk". 3 months later, in spring, the"threat" assessment is still the same; however, the greater "Risk" is now from the bear.
This is the basis for the pro 2nd Amend. the " threat" is kept at bay if the government seeks to reduce the "risk" through representation.
THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN "THREAT" AND "RISK". THE ACTUAL BIGGEST THREAT TO THE U.S IS PROBABLY NUKE WAR OR AN ASTEROID. THE BIGGEST RISK WOULD NOW BE BLM. OF COURSE THE THREAT OF A LARGE GROUP OF ARMED CRAZIES IS LARGE, BUT THE RISK IS LOW. THE BLM THREAT IS PERCIEVED TO BE LOWER , BUT THE RISK IS MUCH HIGHER.
Think of it this way. You go walking in the woods and do a threat assessment. The greatest "threats" on your radar are the wolf and the bear. The bear is deemed the greatest threat, but it is in the middle of January and all of the bears are hibernating. In this case the bear would still be the greater "Threat" but the wolf, being active, would easily be the greater "Risk". 3 months later, in spring, the"threat" assessment is still the same; however, the greater "Risk" is now from the bear.
This is the basis for the pro 2nd Amend. the " threat" is kept at bay if the government seeks to reduce the "risk" through representation.
The deep state is pushing the “white supremacy” narrative really hard. Last I checked, it was black supremacists rioting in every major city.
Perhaps the idea is that the democrats are the white supremacists?
Exactly, those who espouse white privilage are white supremicts.
Why else would someone non chalantly and with determination, expell the prejudice idea that their skin color is what makes them innately superior? The whacky part is that their philosophy of projection is so well embedded in their thoughts that they actually paint targets on their own heads in an attempt to justify the finger pointing they do screaming that we're responsible for their own self hatred.
Think of it this way. You go walking in the woods and do a threat assessment. The greatest "threats" on your radar are the wolf and the bear. The bear is deemed the greatest threat, but it is in the middle of January and all of the bears are hibernating. In this case the bear would still be the greater "Threat" but the wolf, being active, would easily be the greater "Risk". 3 months later, in spring, the"threat" assessment is still the same; however, the greater "Risk" is now from the bear.
This is the basis for the pro 2nd Amend. the " threat" is kept at bay if the government seeks to reduce the "risk" through representation.
THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN "THREAT" AND "RISK". THE ACTUAL BIGGEST THREAT TO THE U.S IS PROBABLY NUKE WAR OR AN ASTEROID. THE BIGGEST RISK WOULD NOW BE BLM. OF COURSE THE THREAT OF A LARGE GROUP OF ARMED CRAZIES IS LARGE, BUT THE RISK IS LOW. THE BLM THREAT IS PERCIEVED TO BE LOWER , BUT THE RISK IS MUCH HIGHER.
No he's not. I'd like to see one example of white supremacy creating any problem in our modern society
I don't see white supremacy burning buildings, looting, and rioting.
This wolf doesn’t want to hunt.
Think of it this way. You go walking in the woods and do a threat assessment. The greatest "threats" on your radar are the wolf and the bear. The bear is deemed the greatest threat, but it is in the middle of January and all of the bears are hibernating. In this case the bear would still be the greater "Threat" but the wolf, being active, would easily be the greater "Risk". 3 months later, in spring, the"threat" assessment is still the same; however, the greater "Risk" is now from the bear.
This is the basis for the pro 2nd Amend. the " threat" is kept at bay if the government seeks to reduce the "risk" through representation.