Anonymous sources are good at being wrong. Trump could've been doing that thing where he pushes an incorrect story down through his ranks to flush out a leader. Hope so. Just say no to ACB.
They got Gorsuch wrong and Kavanaugh right, so they are at 50/50...may as well flip a coin. It would actually be more informative if they were consistently wrong.
I'm seeing all the vultures saying Barrett now. I really hope it's not true. Trump has to know that Lagoa is the smarter pick, and you risk losing Cuban voters in the most important state for what? A possible suburban white woman vote? Their vote isn't changing, they either hate him because orange man bad or they are smart enough not to care about the skin color of a judge.
I'm hoping his strategy is to bait the media with Barrett so that they have less time to Kavanaugh his real pick. But I'm not very hopeful at this point.
I just pointed out on another thread that ACB used to be loved on thedonald even when we were the_donald, constantly plastering her face up whenever RBG had a health scare and now that Trump might pick her, everyone has changed their mind in support of another lady no one has ever posted about before. It's honestly bizarre.
lockdown order citing precedent that justified the japanese internments, generally favors state and corporations in cases, is not just christian but part of groups that speak tongues which is wacky as fuck for the vast majority of people
Watch Viva Freis LIvestreams with Robert Barnes. I trust his judgement and he hates her. As I'm not a legal expert, I'm included to trust Barnes fully. Basically she's going to be another roberts
"This Executive Order does not limit the free exercise of religion. To pro‐
tect the health and safety of faith leaders, staff, con‐
gregants and visitors, religious organizations and
houses of worship are encouraged to consult and
follow the recommended practices and guidelines
from the Illinois Department of Public Health. As
set forth in the IDPH guidelines, the safest practices
for religious organizations at this time are to provide services online, in a drive‐in format, or out‐doors (and consistent with social distancing re‐
quirements and guidance regarding wearing face
coverings), and to limit indoor services to 10 peo‐
ple. Religious organizations are encouraged to take
steps to ensure social distancing, the use of face
coverings, and implementation of other public
health measures. "
Barrett is not a damn snake. This is pure concern troll horseshit. She has a perfectly fine record on immigration, which seems to be what people here are worried about.
Everything I've seen about Barrett is looking like she would be a horrible choice. Another deep state, authoritarian judge and I hope those recent rulings upholding lockdowns in Illinois prove it. Lagoa looks solid and the dems wouldn't know how to handle her. I've heard one constitutional lawyer say Lagoa would be the next Clarence Thomas.
I hate to tell you, but Thomas would vote for masks too.
You must understand that the true Constitutionalist judges like Scalia and Thomas HATE making up rights that are not spelled out in the Constitution. That's why they are against Roe v Wade.
At the same time, they also have classically always sided with the government on issues of police powers, like police searches (Scalia brought us the rule that cops can run their dog around your car for drugs without consent), and death penalty etc. That is why they would side with the government on masks. The Constitution does not explicitly say otherwise, so where would they invent the right to go without?
Gorsuch is a bit different in that he seems very much inclined to stick it to the government, for example in the Oklahoma reservation case.
It's funny because people on here seem to complain both "stupid Gorsuch" and "bad Barrett." Those are actually opposite positions.
The fact is that neither Barrett nor Lagoa (who has nearly no track record to verify) will give you what you want 100% of the time.
But either will be light years better than Ginsburg. Or Roberts.
Just so you know, that decision is fake news. I’m a lawyer and I’ve read it. It does not hold IL lockdowns are OK. The Pennsylvania case that held them unconstitutional was based on a different argument—a line of argument not made at all in the IL case.
The narrow question in the IL case was whether the fact that religious activity was carved out for PREFERENTIAL treatment under the lockdown orders renders the rest of the orders unconstitutional. The complain was about UNEQUAL treatment of religion and other speech.
As the court pointed out, even if it held the inequality mattered, that might just as easily be remedied by imposing STRICTER limits on religion, as it would by changing to looser rules for everything else. The judges didn’t like that idea.
But more importantly the court simply held that religion DOES enjoy special status under the Constitution, and therefore there is nothing wrong about treating it better than general “speech.”
Direct quote:
“ A careful look at the Supreme Court’s Religion Clause cases, coupled with the fact that EO43 is designed to give greater leeway to the exercise of religion, convinces us that the speech that accompanies religious exercise has a privileged position under the First Amendment, and that EO43 permissibly accommodates religious activities.”
Barrett is most likely deep state. She probably entered some shady deal to get two children from Haiti (the same country where Hillary foundation operated).
This video from InfoWars really convinced me that she would be the wrong choice. She'll be the next Roberts....or worse!
They did an extensive piece on her and Lagoa yesterday. They also said she would sail through the process unlike Barrett who could be knocked down on multiple fronts. Lagoa also has some solid support from based R congressmen.
Everyone's talking shit about Barrett in favor of Lagoa, but Lagoa is a milquetoast social Libertarian. She's the kind of judge that would, like all other Trump picks so far, vote in favor of Atheism, homosexuals, abortion, illegal immigrants, and minorities. Half of Oklahoma is going to be transferred to Native authority because of a SC decision that all Trump's picks were in favor of. If you love God, don't want your children to be indoctrinated into faggotry, hate abortion, hate immigration, and don't want your kids to hate their race, Barrett is your #1 pick.
If anyone will it will be a Charismatic Catholic mother of seven...Can you see FFRF being pleased she's on the court? How about the ACLU? No? Thought so.
Barrett may have been a sparkly look at this! while he focused in on Lagoa. 2 days straight in Florida? At Doral?? Remember, black is only one kind of ethnic...but dont try telling them that lest they ruin your dinner the next time you go out, or kill you, whichever.
lagoa is the pick. barrett is a snake
CNN just came out with an article 10 minutes ago saying sources are confirming its Barrett.
Fake news citing anonymous sources, so take it with a mountain of salt.
We're fucked if it's Barrett. The only issue she'll be strong on is abortion, at least until the lizard Pope changes the Church's stance.
Anonymous sources are good at being wrong. Trump could've been doing that thing where he pushes an incorrect story down through his ranks to flush out a leader. Hope so. Just say no to ACB.
These anonymous sources are actually pretty reliable. Unfortunately, they are also off-topic, lol!
Yea if the news is calling it for Barrett and they havnt started the attack yet then you know it’s a ruse. It will be Lagoa
CNN reporting something with no sources makes me think she's not the pick.
They got Gorsuch wrong and Kavanaugh right, so they are at 50/50...may as well flip a coin. It would actually be more informative if they were consistently wrong.
CNN is so good at making themselves look bad that it's a waste of time that could be better spent crapping on the driveways instead.
It wouldn't surprise me if POTUS intentionally mislead the media with these interviews. He loves doing that and making them seem like idiots.
I'm hoping for Lagoa as well but will support any nominee.
I hope so! Looks bad if he doesn't at least meet with Lagoa.
I'm seeing all the vultures saying Barrett now. I really hope it's not true. Trump has to know that Lagoa is the smarter pick, and you risk losing Cuban voters in the most important state for what? A possible suburban white woman vote? Their vote isn't changing, they either hate him because orange man bad or they are smart enough not to care about the skin color of a judge.
I'm hoping his strategy is to bait the media with Barrett so that they have less time to Kavanaugh his real pick. But I'm not very hopeful at this point.
I've heard this alot and I'm inclined to believe it, but do we have sources on this? What rulings or statements has she made that make us think so?
No one seems to have much evidence on the "why ACB is bad" assertion. It just gets picked up and repeated.
I just pointed out on another thread that ACB used to be loved on thedonald even when we were the_donald, constantly plastering her face up whenever RBG had a health scare and now that Trump might pick her, everyone has changed their mind in support of another lady no one has ever posted about before. It's honestly bizarre.
lockdown order citing precedent that justified the japanese internments, generally favors state and corporations in cases, is not just christian but part of groups that speak tongues which is wacky as fuck for the vast majority of people
Watch Viva Freis LIvestreams with Robert Barnes. I trust his judgement and he hates her. As I'm not a legal expert, I'm included to trust Barnes fully. Basically she's going to be another roberts
Found these links, showing that Barrett supports lockdowns:
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/09/04/illinois-coronavirus-lockdown-court-challenge-408747
"This Executive Order does not limit the free exercise of religion. To pro‐ tect the health and safety of faith leaders, staff, con‐ gregants and visitors, religious organizations and houses of worship are encouraged to consult and follow the recommended practices and guidelines from the Illinois Department of Public Health. As set forth in the IDPH guidelines, the safest practices for religious organizations at this time are to provide services online, in a drive‐in format, or out‐doors (and consistent with social distancing re‐ quirements and guidance regarding wearing face coverings), and to limit indoor services to 10 peo‐ ple. Religious organizations are encouraged to take steps to ensure social distancing, the use of face coverings, and implementation of other public health measures. "
http://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/rssExec.pl?Submit=Display&Path=Y2020/D09-03/C:20-2175:J:Wood:aut:T:fnOp:N:2574463:S:0
Sounds like a communist.
Barrett is not a damn snake. This is pure concern troll horseshit. She has a perfectly fine record on immigration, which seems to be what people here are worried about.
I'm sad that this dom as fallen for such BS
Everything I've seen about Barrett is looking like she would be a horrible choice. Another deep state, authoritarian judge and I hope those recent rulings upholding lockdowns in Illinois prove it. Lagoa looks solid and the dems wouldn't know how to handle her. I've heard one constitutional lawyer say Lagoa would be the next Clarence Thomas.
I hate to tell you, but Thomas would vote for masks too.
You must understand that the true Constitutionalist judges like Scalia and Thomas HATE making up rights that are not spelled out in the Constitution. That's why they are against Roe v Wade.
At the same time, they also have classically always sided with the government on issues of police powers, like police searches (Scalia brought us the rule that cops can run their dog around your car for drugs without consent), and death penalty etc. That is why they would side with the government on masks. The Constitution does not explicitly say otherwise, so where would they invent the right to go without?
Gorsuch is a bit different in that he seems very much inclined to stick it to the government, for example in the Oklahoma reservation case.
It's funny because people on here seem to complain both "stupid Gorsuch" and "bad Barrett." Those are actually opposite positions.
The fact is that neither Barrett nor Lagoa (who has nearly no track record to verify) will give you what you want 100% of the time.
But either will be light years better than Ginsburg. Or Roberts.
Or the 25 year old transgender "female" abortion doctor from Berkeley that
BidenHarris would appointLOL. At this point I expect a double-transgender that identifies as a Martian.
That’s why we need 9 clones of Neil Gorsuch on the court!
You'd use the cloning machine on Gorsuch rather than Thomas or Alito???????
Agreed. I just hate that she upheld the Illinois lockdowns.
Just so you know, that decision is fake news. I’m a lawyer and I’ve read it. It does not hold IL lockdowns are OK. The Pennsylvania case that held them unconstitutional was based on a different argument—a line of argument not made at all in the IL case.
The narrow question in the IL case was whether the fact that religious activity was carved out for PREFERENTIAL treatment under the lockdown orders renders the rest of the orders unconstitutional. The complain was about UNEQUAL treatment of religion and other speech.
As the court pointed out, even if it held the inequality mattered, that might just as easily be remedied by imposing STRICTER limits on religion, as it would by changing to looser rules for everything else. The judges didn’t like that idea.
But more importantly the court simply held that religion DOES enjoy special status under the Constitution, and therefore there is nothing wrong about treating it better than general “speech.”
Direct quote: “ A careful look at the Supreme Court’s Religion Clause cases, coupled with the fact that EO43 is designed to give greater leeway to the exercise of religion, convinces us that the speech that accompanies religious exercise has a privileged position under the First Amendment, and that EO43 permissibly accommodates religious activities.”
Barrett is most likely deep state. She probably entered some shady deal to get two children from Haiti (the same country where Hillary foundation operated).
This video from InfoWars really convinced me that she would be the wrong choice. She'll be the next Roberts....or worse!
They did an extensive piece on her and Lagoa yesterday. They also said she would sail through the process unlike Barrett who could be knocked down on multiple fronts. Lagoa also has some solid support from based R congressmen.
Everyone's talking shit about Barrett in favor of Lagoa, but Lagoa is a milquetoast social Libertarian. She's the kind of judge that would, like all other Trump picks so far, vote in favor of Atheism, homosexuals, abortion, illegal immigrants, and minorities. Half of Oklahoma is going to be transferred to Native authority because of a SC decision that all Trump's picks were in favor of. If you love God, don't want your children to be indoctrinated into faggotry, hate abortion, hate immigration, and don't want your kids to hate their race, Barrett is your #1 pick.
You're delusional if you think any SC judge is going to "rule" against atheism, homosexuals, etc.
If anyone will it will be a Charismatic Catholic mother of seven...Can you see FFRF being pleased she's on the court? How about the ACLU? No? Thought so.
Barrett may have been a sparkly look at this! while he focused in on Lagoa. 2 days straight in Florida? At Doral?? Remember, black is only one kind of ethnic...but dont try telling them that lest they ruin your dinner the next time you go out, or kill you, whichever.
Yes, he did.
I was looking for this too. I'm really hoping for Lagoa.