Anonymous sources are good at being wrong. Trump could've been doing that thing where he pushes an incorrect story down through his ranks to flush out a leader. Hope so. Just say no to ACB.
They got Gorsuch wrong and Kavanaugh right, so they are at 50/50...may as well flip a coin. It would actually be more informative if they were consistently wrong.
I'm seeing all the vultures saying Barrett now. I really hope it's not true. Trump has to know that Lagoa is the smarter pick, and you risk losing Cuban voters in the most important state for what? A possible suburban white woman vote? Their vote isn't changing, they either hate him because orange man bad or they are smart enough not to care about the skin color of a judge.
I'm hoping his strategy is to bait the media with Barrett so that they have less time to Kavanaugh his real pick. But I'm not very hopeful at this point.
I just pointed out on another thread that ACB used to be loved on thedonald even when we were the_donald, constantly plastering her face up whenever RBG had a health scare and now that Trump might pick her, everyone has changed their mind in support of another lady no one has ever posted about before. It's honestly bizarre.
Basically their argument is “Pope bad, ACB is Catholic, therefore ACB is bad”. The Pope sucks but ACB isn’t attached at the hip to Dope Francis. She’ll be great. NOMINATE! CONFIRM!
I don't think anyone really knows anything. There's the lockdown ruling but if that was narrowly decided then a judge's options are limited. It was a unanimous decision on the panel which included another Trump appointee. Then all this "wacky religious stuff" that I swear is coming straight from ActBlue talking points.
I think people liked the idea of her but being so close to the election makes lagoa far pragmatic and better. Besides, they are all old so if he wins more than likely acb will get on soon.
lockdown order citing precedent that justified the japanese internments, generally favors state and corporations in cases, is not just christian but part of groups that speak tongues which is wacky as fuck for the vast majority of people
Watch Viva Freis LIvestreams with Robert Barnes. I trust his judgement and he hates her. As I'm not a legal expert, I'm included to trust Barnes fully. Basically she's going to be another roberts
"This Executive Order does not limit the free exercise of religion. To pro‐
tect the health and safety of faith leaders, staff, con‐
gregants and visitors, religious organizations and
houses of worship are encouraged to consult and
follow the recommended practices and guidelines
from the Illinois Department of Public Health. As
set forth in the IDPH guidelines, the safest practices
for religious organizations at this time are to provide services online, in a drive‐in format, or out‐doors (and consistent with social distancing re‐
quirements and guidance regarding wearing face
coverings), and to limit indoor services to 10 peo‐
ple. Religious organizations are encouraged to take
steps to ensure social distancing, the use of face
coverings, and implementation of other public
health measures. "
Barrett is not a damn snake. This is pure concern troll horseshit. She has a perfectly fine record on immigration, which seems to be what people here are worried about.
lagoa is the pick. barrett is a snake
CNN just came out with an article 10 minutes ago saying sources are confirming its Barrett.
Fake news citing anonymous sources, so take it with a mountain of salt.
We're fucked if it's Barrett. The only issue she'll be strong on is abortion, at least until the lizard Pope changes the Church's stance.
Anonymous sources are good at being wrong. Trump could've been doing that thing where he pushes an incorrect story down through his ranks to flush out a leader. Hope so. Just say no to ACB.
These anonymous sources are actually pretty reliable. Unfortunately, they are also off-topic, lol!
Yea if the news is calling it for Barrett and they havnt started the attack yet then you know it’s a ruse. It will be Lagoa
CNN reporting something with no sources makes me think she's not the pick.
They got Gorsuch wrong and Kavanaugh right, so they are at 50/50...may as well flip a coin. It would actually be more informative if they were consistently wrong.
CNN is so good at making themselves look bad that it's a waste of time that could be better spent crapping on the driveways instead.
It wouldn't surprise me if POTUS intentionally mislead the media with these interviews. He loves doing that and making them seem like idiots.
I'm hoping for Lagoa as well but will support any nominee.
I hope so! Looks bad if he doesn't at least meet with Lagoa.
I'm seeing all the vultures saying Barrett now. I really hope it's not true. Trump has to know that Lagoa is the smarter pick, and you risk losing Cuban voters in the most important state for what? A possible suburban white woman vote? Their vote isn't changing, they either hate him because orange man bad or they are smart enough not to care about the skin color of a judge.
I'm hoping his strategy is to bait the media with Barrett so that they have less time to Kavanaugh his real pick. But I'm not very hopeful at this point.
I've heard this alot and I'm inclined to believe it, but do we have sources on this? What rulings or statements has she made that make us think so?
No one seems to have much evidence on the "why ACB is bad" assertion. It just gets picked up and repeated.
I just pointed out on another thread that ACB used to be loved on thedonald even when we were the_donald, constantly plastering her face up whenever RBG had a health scare and now that Trump might pick her, everyone has changed their mind in support of another lady no one has ever posted about before. It's honestly bizarre.
Basically their argument is “Pope bad, ACB is Catholic, therefore ACB is bad”. The Pope sucks but ACB isn’t attached at the hip to Dope Francis. She’ll be great. NOMINATE! CONFIRM!
I don't think anyone really knows anything. There's the lockdown ruling but if that was narrowly decided then a judge's options are limited. It was a unanimous decision on the panel which included another Trump appointee. Then all this "wacky religious stuff" that I swear is coming straight from ActBlue talking points.
I think people liked the idea of her but being so close to the election makes lagoa far pragmatic and better. Besides, they are all old so if he wins more than likely acb will get on soon.
lockdown order citing precedent that justified the japanese internments, generally favors state and corporations in cases, is not just christian but part of groups that speak tongues which is wacky as fuck for the vast majority of people
Shit she speaks in tongues and lets people know about it, well, that MUST mean she's a pro-trans flaky cuckwife, according to some of the logic here.
Sources?
Watch Viva Freis LIvestreams with Robert Barnes. I trust his judgement and he hates her. As I'm not a legal expert, I'm included to trust Barnes fully. Basically she's going to be another roberts
I like Robert Barnes but I don't think he knows much about constitutional law.
Found these links, showing that Barrett supports lockdowns:
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/09/04/illinois-coronavirus-lockdown-court-challenge-408747
"This Executive Order does not limit the free exercise of religion. To pro‐ tect the health and safety of faith leaders, staff, con‐ gregants and visitors, religious organizations and houses of worship are encouraged to consult and follow the recommended practices and guidelines from the Illinois Department of Public Health. As set forth in the IDPH guidelines, the safest practices for religious organizations at this time are to provide services online, in a drive‐in format, or out‐doors (and consistent with social distancing re‐ quirements and guidance regarding wearing face coverings), and to limit indoor services to 10 peo‐ ple. Religious organizations are encouraged to take steps to ensure social distancing, the use of face coverings, and implementation of other public health measures. "
http://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/rssExec.pl?Submit=Display&Path=Y2020/D09-03/C:20-2175:J:Wood:aut:T:fnOp:N:2574463:S:0
Sounds like a communist.
Barrett is not a damn snake. This is pure concern troll horseshit. She has a perfectly fine record on immigration, which seems to be what people here are worried about.
I'm sad that this dom as fallen for such BS