lockdown order citing precedent that justified the japanese internments, generally favors state and corporations in cases, is not just christian but part of groups that speak tongues which is wacky as fuck for the vast majority of people
Thanks. I'm looking around for something by a legal expert I already trust.
I feel like this is a psyop. There were so many pro-Barrett articles over the years and now all of a sudden conservatives are sounding the alarm? Makes no sense.
lockdown order citing precedent that justified the japanese internments, generally favors state and corporations in cases, is not just christian but part of groups that speak tongues which is wacky as fuck for the vast majority of people
Shit she speaks in tongues and lets people know about it, well, that MUST mean she's a pro-trans flaky cuckwife, according to some of the logic here.
Sources?
https://thedonald.win/p/HXtQfNm4/x/c/17rmA8Hfcf
https://gameruprising.to/index.php?threads/patriotic-attorney-sounds-alarm-about-amy-coney-barrett%E2%80%99s-extremely-worrisome-rulings-record.10568/
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3887664/posts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXdvK7Qxyto
Thanks. I'm looking around for something by a legal expert I already trust.
I feel like this is a psyop. There were so many pro-Barrett articles over the years and now all of a sudden conservatives are sounding the alarm? Makes no sense.
Edit: this is National Review but Ed Whelan is great on SCOTUS. Here he is on Barrett and 2A: https://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/judge-barrett-on-the-second-amendment/
Someone posted this below:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXdvK7Qxyto