5084
Comments (1003)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
0
jeffreyepstein 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yep, quite familiar with the many different forms of Catholicism. This actually highlights the point I’m trying to make, since these churches all have one thing in common, they’re derivatives of derivatives that were formed based on a single interpretation of the Gospel Story. None of which have historical proof of being started by any of the apostles, nor is there proof that any of their rituals We’re ever practiced by anyone directly associated with Jesus.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
jeffreyepstein 1 point ago +1 / -0

Tradition is another word for my ‘derivative of derivatives’ comment. Conclusions were formed and over time people change those beliefs to match theirs. This is not an opinion this is fact

1
ajmlecciones 1 point ago +1 / -0

I really suggest you talk to a priest, theologian, or even a secular expert on church history. You have so many facts wrong.