Exactly. We aren’t in full lockstep with him 100% of the time. I’ve rarely disagreed with the man but at times he does make mistakes because he is just a man. A great man, but a man all the same.
Listen, I am 100% behind our President, but sometimes he makes choices based on what he knows and thinks at the time, and sometimes he turns out to have been, if not wrong, but mislead about the people he chooses to serve in his administration, and he is not perfect as much as we joke around about that he is. He came into this job without a complete understanding of how Washington works, and was surrounded by swamp devils whispering in his ears.
The Donald.win is not, and should never be an echo chamber. People need a place where they can speak their mind even if they don't agree with what Trump does sometimes.
This is how I believe the vast majority of us here feel. We like to joke about the 5D Time-Traveling Chess he plays but in reality he obviously is surrounded by imperfect people. Some of whom, especially at the beginning, were actively trying to thwart him.
When he goes with his gut instinct, he’s rarely wrong. When he listens to advisors it’s more hit or miss. GEOTUS’s batting average would make Ted Williams look like a benchwarmer chump. I wanted him to choose the based Cuban but what do I know? If he goes with Amy, I’m all in, trust but verify.
Mattis was actually a good pick. He did get ISIS eradicated. It's just when the time came between choosing the right thing and choosing the military industrial complex, well... His true colors came out.
Trump also used bolton very successfully to play good cop bad cop, and then enjoyed watching bolton gnash his teeth after he made him sit in the corner.
Trump is better than could have been expected or hoped for, and doing an amazing job, but there's no reason to pretend that his picks have been perfect. Having said that, it's done, and ACB is the pick. So now we can all move on and hope she was the right choice. We'll know soon enough. It's not easy to pick people. There's so much corruption and so many swamp monsters. I don't envy Trump's position, and I'm not really sure if anyone could do better. It's possible that Trump is doing better than anyone else could, despite this being his biggest weakness.
To be fair, I think he made some of those appointments while he was still adapting to his new role. His skills have been greatly refined over the past few years. He knows how to see through facades and vet players.
From now on we need to use the democratic support test. If Democrats support a nomination even a little bit, then it’s probably a bad choice. If they oppose the nomination with every weapon they have, then it’s an excellent choice. Compare kavanaugh to Wray or mad dog Mattis for examples. The flak is heaviest when directly over the target...
It’s not that he makes bad choices, the DS shutdown clearing ppl for jobs which narrowed the selection. Also the swamp creatures in Congress has to approve, see what it took to get Ratcliffe in there? Trump learns and adjust so fast and that’s why the left is so frustrated.
Here, I'll tell you why it's a problem that Gorsuch is forcing Congress to deal with....because you can jail a Christian in Oregon for refusing to bake a cake, but you can't jail a Christian in Missouri for refusing to bake a cake. See, Congress must deal with that disparity.
I don’t judge by gender. She wrote a paper speaking the internal conflicts a catholic judge may have with the church and certain rulings.
She also agreed with the majority in an appellate case where the governor issued an executive order limiting republicans and religious groups to allow only 50 people to gather. That’s not freedom.
This isn’t true. She ruled against gop staring that because the governor had ALLOWED religious gatherings that means he has to allow political gatherings. I’m not sure how people on this site are so knowledgeable about the other 2 branches but just clearly know fuck all about how the judiciary works. It was a shit argument a high schooler would make and no judge in the country would take it seriously. We need to bitch about our state level operatives and legislators in that case, if they can’t devise an argument for something other state’s literally never questioned since it’s just a cut and dry first amendment issue, but they totally fucked up the argument. Judges don’t hear an argument and then rule on whatever issues the argument make spring in to their mind and then just hand down edicts. They rule on the merit of the argument....
Republicans had the case thrown out so this isn’t true. That’s what we are discussing here. Religious groups lobbied the governor and that is why they were exempted, the gop played off that in their case which is why it was garbage and was thrown out. The judge rules on the question and case at hand. No one was ruling on the entire order allowing freedom or not. This isn’t how the courts work.
You're lying. Gorsuch made no such law. It was a law passed by Congress in 1964. All Gorsuch did was abide by the law that Congress already passed, which is exactly why he was hired...to abide by the laws passed by Congress, not make up new rules, even rules you want to create.
If you don't like the law, then get off your comfy touche and get out the vote....
Justice Gorsuch's opinion emphasizes text over the intention of the authors of Title VII.
We agree that homosexuality and transgender status are distinct concepts from sex. But, as we've seen, discrimination based on homosexuality or transgender status necessarily entails discrimination based on sex; the first cannot happen without the second. Nor is there any such thing as a "canon of donut holes," in which Congress's failure to speak directly to a specificcase that falls within a more general statutory rule creates a tacit exception. Instead, when Congress chooses not to include any exceptions to a broad rule, courts apply the broad rule. And that is exactly how this Court has alwaysapproached Title VII. "Sexual harassment" is conceptuallydistinct from sex discrimination, but it can fall within Title VII's sweep. Oncale, 523 U. S., at 79–80. Same with "motherhood discrimination." See Phillips, 400 U. S., at 544. Would the employers have us reverse those cases on the theory that Congress could have spoken to those problems more specifically? Of course not. As enacted, Title VII prohibits all forms of discrimination because of sex, however they may manifest themselves or whatever other labels might attach to them.
**Instead, when Congress chooses not to include any exceptions to a broad rule, courts apply the broad rule.
**
Congress adds exceptions all the time, and they can cure this up too. Gorsuch didn't, as you claim, create new law. He's just forcing Congress to do its job....
Why is it a requirement to include an exception when that is not required? That’s stupid fucking logic. That’s like saying congress must always creat laws with loopholes or else it isn’t properly written. Fucking idiotic.
Exceptions may not be required in your mind, but the fact that the moonbats in California passed laws in direct contradiction automatically force those exceptions to be made.
Trump didn't care about optics when he slammed Sessions. It was people here as well as powerful media figures on the right that prevented Trump from doing the right thing.
Trump makes mistakes like any human. The real problem is us thinking that we know better than he does.
Have y’all considered that trump is aware he can shuffle those appointments around at a whim and thus, politics weighs heavily in to those decision, yet this isn’t the case with a Supreme Court nom and he does, in fact, realize it’s a lifetime appointment? Half of you want FOAM PARTY FUCK BOI RUBIO and his think tanks to win the argument and pick the seat!
Have y’all considered that trump is aware he can shuffle those appointments around at a whim and thus, politics weighs heavily in to those decision, yet this isn’t the case with a Supreme Court nom and he does, in fact, realize it’s a lifetime appointment? Half of you want FOAM PARTY FUCK BOI RUBIO and his think tanks to win the argument and pick the seat!
Lol, sessions cost us 3 years. Wray is still there fucking shit up for us. He cannot move these around at whim. The fact that you said that is crazy. I never supported Rubio either, my guy
What do you mean he can’t? Be specific, because I’m fairly sure they serve at the pleasure of the POTUS. Maybe you aren’t from the US but that’s how it works here, my guy.
You arent from the US. If you were, youd have an understanding about 1) how things work and 2) you would know that sessions was not replaced "on a whim", and that wray is still there
Lagoa being pushed by rubio is a dumb attempt at trying to say I like Rubio
Well if thats the case then something is wrong with you lol. He couldnt get rid of sessions until after the midterms. He still cant get rid of wray. Do you want to finally comment on that?
Exactly. I have no doubt he will make the absolute best choice he can out of those available to him. They still won't be ideal, because of the Senate. It's our job to get the RINOs out of our legislature.
Agreed, as the country rests on a knife edge, now is not the time get risky with what is a great gift for him at this time.
Look at the other judges, many of them are elderly and some are in poor health. He will get at least one or two more picks where he can put a great pick up for nomination that will be more what we want.
Jeff Sessions is as good as it gets for border control. Trump endorsed a candidate for mass immigration instead. That was one of Trump's mistakes about choosing people. A grudge obscured his judgment.
You don't get it. You're SUPPOSED to reach across the isle. That's why Trump invited Chuck and Nancy to the White House. He was trying to have negotiations, which is exactly why I voted for him.
But in 2020, time has CLEARLY shown us that all efforts to negotiate only result in stonewalling, which is why Trump doesn't do it anymore. He's gotten us the wall without Democrats. He's changing healthcare without Democrats. And on and on.
Maybe someday after the Democrat party dies, we can reach across the isle again to whatever new party has arisen. I would hope so because forming a more perfect union is what our country is supposed to be about.
Sessions and Wray were the best picks for their jobs, according to retarded dipfucks that are unable to form their own opinions about anything without governmental permission.
Hear hear.
This is also my worry. She could potentially be another Roberts as she may he compromised by her past which would lead to blackmail. She has a big family, she’s got a lot to lose.
Anyone can make a bad choice, and Trump has made bad appointments before. I don’t have a strong opinion on this one, but the “Trump is literally incapable of making a mistake” circlejerk is not that much better than the doom and gloom one you’re responding to.
I understand the instinct to protect our President from criticism because of the Alps worth of shit thrown at him, but we can’t turn in to those we loath. We simply cannot throw aside reason and opinions because we don’t agree with Trump or each other.
The two SCOTUS picks he’s already made have been meh at best. More liberal that I was expecting. One of his selections gave half of Oklahoma back to the Indians. 😂
"concern trolls" 🤔 Only a faggot would use such wording on a POLITICAL social media platform... Let me guess... You are also ok with 1% running hollywood, MSM and the banks... "concern 4chan troll, it doesn matter they own the big banks, hollywood, MSM and voted in the central bank in 1913... STOP BEING ANTI SEMITIC!"-Some pussified brainwashed faggot that hurts our society
Fuck this sheep ass post. What differs me from the left is the fact that I don’t blindly follow ANYONE. Fuck this post and any sheep that upvotes it. This comes from the soy Jeb bush side of conservatives and fuck all of you.
Bro i support Trump but your post is some beta male level dick riding faggotry man. Gorsuch gave us trannies in schools and hate crime laws. How about you stop being a mindless sycophant and realize trump is capable of msking poor choices just like anyone else, this scotus pick being an example.
Right on! I've told a few people this myself when they say "well his dad gave him a million dollars" and I'm like "really? So each time you get a paycheck you're guaranteed to be a millionaire"? Cause making 1,000,000,000 from 1,000,000 is essentially the same as making 1,000,000 from 1,000. And I guarantee you you're not going to make a million dollars (or if you do it's not because you have 1,000 dollars now)
Dude....not even. $1000 dollars your’e sitting at the kids table. No way to acquire real estate or stock options. Your basically buying an ounce of blow and selling 20 bags. With $1,000,000 you can actually sit at the grown up table and get that money working for you. Not saying it’s easy but at least it’s possible.
That’s ridiculous. Like $1,000 gets you nothing but $1,000,000 buys you a seat at the big boys table and guarantees you a billion (thousand million)
You can’t sit at the big boys table with $1,000. But you can’t sit at the super big boys table with $1,000,000 either.
Yes, it takes a long time to go from $1,000 to $1,000,000 with lots of incremental transactions along the way all with the potential for loss...
just like it takes lots of time, skill, and savvy to go from $1,000,000 to $1,000,000,000 with lots of incremental transactions along the way all with the potential for loss.
Trump starting with a million dollars in no way guaranteed he’d end up with a billion.
But that’s the argument you seem to be making... “because he got to sit at the big boys table”
And you literally said going from a milllion to a billion was passionless. Like Trump hasn’t shown more passion than almost any public figure you could conceivably name. Both in his presidency and even before (there’s a reason he was a household name)
Damn autocorrect, it was to read possible. We all know the Don has passion. And a million does not get you a seat at the big big boy table, I get that. It’s just a far more advantageous position to be in, and not the same in my opinion as just having $1000.
I agree, it is a far more advantageous position to be in. But a billion is a much higher hurdle to reach too.
If you can find a way to double a thousand to two thousand why can you not, in theory, do it again? and again 1,000 times.
Just like you’d have to do to your first million a thousand times to reach a billion.
And it’s not that hard to turn a thousand into two thousand. People do it all the time.
My next door neighbors basically live off buying and selling junk and fixing it up. People start Amazon accounts selling stuff they buy at thrift stores and make a living off of it.
It’s not easy. But it’s not harder than making consistently profitable real estate deals.
And that’s not even to mention that you can get into real estate with 1,000 bucks too. I bought an option on a house once for a hundred bucks. If I could have found a buyer in the two month option period I would have pocketed the money I sold it for (in excess of my optioned price)... it’s called flipping houses.
I didn’t because that wasn’t my goal. But the point is that you don’t need a million dollars to make money in real estate.
And it’s no harder to turn $1,000 into $2,000 than it is to turn 1,000,000 into 2,000,000. And on from there.
And watch, I'll ask you to give me the time frame on his last speech where he said that and you'll just, poof, mysteriously disappear, because you know it doesn't exist and you are fake news.
Yes, he's definitely not changing it for me (although I do believe in a way he did make it for me, and for all of us, sincerely from his heart, because that's Trump), and I am glad for today, because RBG is dead and ACB will probably be at least marginally better, even if she turns out to be an authoritarian big government trojan horse. And I do trust Trump, because I've made the mistake of not doing so in the past and been proven wrong. And because I believe that he is a gift from God and a divine intervention. And most of all because I believe he is a good man who genuinely loves America. And because there is no better option.
But I still consider you to be a mindless shill who is all that could become wrong with the current agenda to Make America Great Again... marginalizing anyone who disagrees with you, even if it's genuine concern over a lifetime appointment by a fallible human man. This isn't Trumps fight, it's our fight. (even Trump knows that do you), and we have cause to be concerned. Which does not make us "concern trolls". It makes us human. And shows how invested we are in this struggle for what we love (America).
Fuck you and your "low energy" insults and "concern trolling" accusations, from someone who 100% supports Trump, and will give him the benefit of the doubt on any nomination even if I am worried.
There's a reason that crowds say they love Trump, literally tell him that they love him... but it's not because they think he is an infallible God... actually it's because they know that he is not, but that he is fighting just like they are.
Yeah some people want us to be just like the left wing NPCs we mock
When I agree with Trump I speak out. When I disagree with him I speak out.
Exactly. We aren’t in full lockstep with him 100% of the time. I’ve rarely disagreed with the man but at times he does make mistakes because he is just a man. A great man, but a man all the same.
Agreed, our loyalty is to our principles, not to any mortal man.
I'm going to write a very strongly worded letter.
Sessions and Mattis come to mind too.
Listen, I am 100% behind our President, but sometimes he makes choices based on what he knows and thinks at the time, and sometimes he turns out to have been, if not wrong, but mislead about the people he chooses to serve in his administration, and he is not perfect as much as we joke around about that he is. He came into this job without a complete understanding of how Washington works, and was surrounded by swamp devils whispering in his ears.
The Donald.win is not, and should never be an echo chamber. People need a place where they can speak their mind even if they don't agree with what Trump does sometimes.
This is how I believe the vast majority of us here feel. We like to joke about the 5D Time-Traveling Chess he plays but in reality he obviously is surrounded by imperfect people. Some of whom, especially at the beginning, were actively trying to thwart him.
When he goes with his gut instinct, he’s rarely wrong. When he listens to advisors it’s more hit or miss. GEOTUS’s batting average would make Ted Williams look like a benchwarmer chump. I wanted him to choose the based Cuban but what do I know? If he goes with Amy, I’m all in, trust but verify.
Same here.
Mattis was actually a good pick. He did get ISIS eradicated. It's just when the time came between choosing the right thing and choosing the military industrial complex, well... His true colors came out.
Oh and are we gonna forget John fucking Bolton?
Trump also used bolton very successfully to play good cop bad cop, and then enjoyed watching bolton gnash his teeth after he made him sit in the corner.
Trump is better than could have been expected or hoped for, and doing an amazing job, but there's no reason to pretend that his picks have been perfect. Having said that, it's done, and ACB is the pick. So now we can all move on and hope she was the right choice. We'll know soon enough. It's not easy to pick people. There's so much corruption and so many swamp monsters. I don't envy Trump's position, and I'm not really sure if anyone could do better. It's possible that Trump is doing better than anyone else could, despite this being his biggest weakness.
To be fair, I think he made some of those appointments while he was still adapting to his new role. His skills have been greatly refined over the past few years. He knows how to see through facades and vet players.
From now on we need to use the democratic support test. If Democrats support a nomination even a little bit, then it’s probably a bad choice. If they oppose the nomination with every weapon they have, then it’s an excellent choice. Compare kavanaugh to Wray or mad dog Mattis for examples. The flak is heaviest when directly over the target...
It’s not that he makes bad choices, the DS shutdown clearing ppl for jobs which narrowed the selection. Also the swamp creatures in Congress has to approve, see what it took to get Ratcliffe in there? Trump learns and adjust so fast and that’s why the left is so frustrated.
Came here to say this. Thanks!
So anybody who doesn’t agree 100% is a shill. Right.
Bet you’re the loving the fact Gorsuch created a new law making sexual preference a protected class then.
Here, I'll tell you why it's a problem that Gorsuch is forcing Congress to deal with....because you can jail a Christian in Oregon for refusing to bake a cake, but you can't jail a Christian in Missouri for refusing to bake a cake. See, Congress must deal with that disparity.
Has nothing to do with the text in textual.
This isnt true at all. Most have been shitting on her for her pro lockdown ruling
She’s also made questionable comments about how her feelings play a part in her rulings.
I don’t judge by gender. She wrote a paper speaking the internal conflicts a catholic judge may have with the church and certain rulings.
She also agreed with the majority in an appellate case where the governor issued an executive order limiting republicans and religious groups to allow only 50 people to gather. That’s not freedom.
This isn’t true. She ruled against gop staring that because the governor had ALLOWED religious gatherings that means he has to allow political gatherings. I’m not sure how people on this site are so knowledgeable about the other 2 branches but just clearly know fuck all about how the judiciary works. It was a shit argument a high schooler would make and no judge in the country would take it seriously. We need to bitch about our state level operatives and legislators in that case, if they can’t devise an argument for something other state’s literally never questioned since it’s just a cut and dry first amendment issue, but they totally fucked up the argument. Judges don’t hear an argument and then rule on whatever issues the argument make spring in to their mind and then just hand down edicts. They rule on the merit of the argument....
The result was both republicans and religious groups were restricted to 50 people.
That’s not freedom.
Republicans had the case thrown out so this isn’t true. That’s what we are discussing here. Religious groups lobbied the governor and that is why they were exempted, the gop played off that in their case which is why it was garbage and was thrown out. The judge rules on the question and case at hand. No one was ruling on the entire order allowing freedom or not. This isn’t how the courts work.
The appellate court upheld the district ruling.
The district ruling used a vaccination case against the the republicans to uphold the governor’s EO.
The governor’s EO starting with only 10 people eventually limited religious gatherings to %25 capacity.
They said the republicans couldn’t have more rights than the religious groups so everybody was held to limited gatherings.
Less freedom for everybody.
SCOTUS doesn't make laws 🙄
Shit. If you believe that I’ve got a bridge I’ll sell you.
I mean, it's SCOTUS' job is listed in the constitution. You can check it out there
They can interpret laws sure, but they don't make laws
It's an important distinction because interpretations can change over time more easily than laws.
Either you’re very young or very naive.
A whole new protected class was created when Gorsuch said sex meant sexual preference. That’s creating a new law.
Nobody in 1964 thought sex meant sexual preference. No. Fucking. Body.
If Gorsuch wanted that included he should have told congress to go back and amend title vii.
That’s the correct way to do it. He just made shit up because he’s a fucking hack.
You both make very good points. Ain't politics grand?
Shouldn't, but does. Legislating from the bench is a thing.
You're lying. Gorsuch made no such law. It was a law passed by Congress in 1964. All Gorsuch did was abide by the law that Congress already passed, which is exactly why he was hired...to abide by the laws passed by Congress, not make up new rules, even rules you want to create.
If you don't like the law, then get off your comfy touche and get out the vote....
Bullshit. Sex did not mean sexual preference. It meant male or female. To suggest that is fucking absurd.
Then Congress can clear that up, which is their job, to make clear the unclear....
It was never unclear before we entered Clown World, and Gorsuch betrayed the clear meaning of the law.
Gorsuch is correct....
Justice Gorsuch's opinion emphasizes text over the intention of the authors of Title VII.
We agree that homosexuality and transgender status are distinct concepts from sex. But, as we've seen, discrimination based on homosexuality or transgender status necessarily entails discrimination based on sex; the first cannot happen without the second. Nor is there any such thing as a "canon of donut holes," in which Congress's failure to speak directly to a specificcase that falls within a more general statutory rule creates a tacit exception. Instead, when Congress chooses not to include any exceptions to a broad rule, courts apply the broad rule. And that is exactly how this Court has alwaysapproached Title VII. "Sexual harassment" is conceptuallydistinct from sex discrimination, but it can fall within Title VII's sweep. Oncale, 523 U. S., at 79–80. Same with "motherhood discrimination." See Phillips, 400 U. S., at 544. Would the employers have us reverse those cases on the theory that Congress could have spoken to those problems more specifically? Of course not. As enacted, Title VII prohibits all forms of discrimination because of sex, however they may manifest themselves or whatever other labels might attach to them.
It’s fucking bullshit.
If you’re “textual” you read what the law says. The law doesn’t say “sexual preference”.
Everybody knew what it meant when it was written.
If you have to know what they meant to say, then it wasn't clear.....
No need to make what was clear clear.
If the law meant sexual preference it would have said sexual preference.
That’s called being textual and what Gorsuch was supposed to be.
That is what Barrett is supposed to be.
However we find most times judges aren’t what they claim.
**Instead, when Congress chooses not to include any exceptions to a broad rule, courts apply the broad rule. ** Congress adds exceptions all the time, and they can cure this up too. Gorsuch didn't, as you claim, create new law. He's just forcing Congress to do its job....
Why is it a requirement to include an exception when that is not required? That’s stupid fucking logic. That’s like saying congress must always creat laws with loopholes or else it isn’t properly written. Fucking idiotic.
Exceptions may not be required in your mind, but the fact that the moonbats in California passed laws in direct contradiction automatically force those exceptions to be made.
You are right here, but you contradict your original (and wrong) post.
It was the job of congress if they wanted to add in liberal bullshit. Instead, gorsuch engaged in judicial activism and gave them a w
You're just repeating what you've already said. Facts and logic are no match against your emotions.
That was the first time I have spoken to you. Your emotions are, ironically, getting the better of you right now
I haven't even told you what my opinion is on this subject, so it's impossible for you to even know what my emotions are related to it.
This is gay. "Whoever he picks is the best choice". Super gay. Kissing Jeff sessions and chris wray on their neck gay.
Seriously. OP is a uber faggot
Fun fact: Trump wanted to fire Sessions in the first month.
Yet, Sessions stayed on for almost 2 years. Do you know why?
Optics/trouble nominating and confirming a new AG
doesn't change the fact that "whoever he picks is always the best" is really dumb liberal bullshit argument
Trump didn't care about optics when he slammed Sessions. It was people here as well as powerful media figures on the right that prevented Trump from doing the right thing.
Trump makes mistakes like any human. The real problem is us thinking that we know better than he does.
Have y’all considered that trump is aware he can shuffle those appointments around at a whim and thus, politics weighs heavily in to those decision, yet this isn’t the case with a Supreme Court nom and he does, in fact, realize it’s a lifetime appointment? Half of you want FOAM PARTY FUCK BOI RUBIO and his think tanks to win the argument and pick the seat!
Have y’all considered that trump is aware he can shuffle those appointments around at a whim and thus, politics weighs heavily in to those decision, yet this isn’t the case with a Supreme Court nom and he does, in fact, realize it’s a lifetime appointment? Half of you want FOAM PARTY FUCK BOI RUBIO and his think tanks to win the argument and pick the seat!
Lol, sessions cost us 3 years. Wray is still there fucking shit up for us. He cannot move these around at whim. The fact that you said that is crazy. I never supported Rubio either, my guy
What do you mean he can’t? Be specific, because I’m fairly sure they serve at the pleasure of the POTUS. Maybe you aren’t from the US but that’s how it works here, my guy.
Edit: Lagoa was pushed by Rubio
You arent from the US. If you were, youd have an understanding about 1) how things work and 2) you would know that sessions was not replaced "on a whim", and that wray is still there
Lagoa being pushed by rubio is a dumb attempt at trying to say I like Rubio
My family was here prior to, and fought in, the revolution lol. Fuck off. He appoints them and fires them when he wants as per the constitution.
Well if thats the case then something is wrong with you lol. He couldnt get rid of sessions until after the midterms. He still cant get rid of wray. Do you want to finally comment on that?
Would you say, possibly...politics factors in to those decisions? Just like I said in my first comment?
Trump is limited to neocon picks that our corrupt RINO senators will approve. He has to pick the least bad neocon justice that he can.
This is a far better take than "TRUMP IS ALWAYS RIGHT" which is childish. That's the type of NPC behavior we mock the left for.
Exactly. I have no doubt he will make the absolute best choice he can out of those available to him. They still won't be ideal, because of the Senate. It's our job to get the RINOs out of our legislature.
Careful. That sort of talk isn't allowed here on thedonald.win
You're not supposed to be logical and accurate. You're just supposed to post emotional memes, even if they don't support Trump.
Agreed, as the country rests on a knife edge, now is not the time get risky with what is a great gift for him at this time.
Look at the other judges, many of them are elderly and some are in poor health. He will get at least one or two more picks where he can put a great pick up for nomination that will be more what we want.
I just got really excited about a Cuban Capitalist who had already experienced communism in her family heritage. Super relevant pick.
So did I.
Next time, when there’s less of a time crunch and potential lib bullshit. We needed a quick win to have 9 in for after the nov 3 nonsense happens.
None of the 5 choices are bad. All of them are infinitely better than Ginsburg. I'm still hoping for Eid.
Allison Eid appears to be the best of the bunch based on what I read on her.
Link?
Here's a start
Jeff Sessions, Mattis, Mooch, etc. Trump is too trusting. He's made many mistakes in hiring snakes.
Jeff Sessions is as good as it gets for border control. Trump endorsed a candidate for mass immigration instead. That was one of Trump's mistakes about choosing people. A grudge obscured his judgment.
Mooch got fired within a month. Sessions would have too if not for us and Tucker.
Trump makes mistakes but isn't afraid to correct them. Us, on the other hand...
Jesse Lee Peterson slices and dices Mooch to his face : https://youtu.be/B2BiokbyFc8
Oh I see. Trump became a billionaire because he's too trusting. Makes so much sense. /s
Some of his picks are terrible. And he kept trying to deal with the Democrats I would have gone ham
You don't get it. You're SUPPOSED to reach across the isle. That's why Trump invited Chuck and Nancy to the White House. He was trying to have negotiations, which is exactly why I voted for him.
But in 2020, time has CLEARLY shown us that all efforts to negotiate only result in stonewalling, which is why Trump doesn't do it anymore. He's gotten us the wall without Democrats. He's changing healthcare without Democrats. And on and on.
Maybe someday after the Democrat party dies, we can reach across the isle again to whatever new party has arisen. I would hope so because forming a more perfect union is what our country is supposed to be about.
fwiw one of his self-admitted flaws is that he's too trusting
That's not a self-admitted flaw. That's his answer to MSM faggots who never stop asking the question "What mistakes have you made in your Presidency".
He doesn't give a shit about them. You think he's going to answer that question honestly to those assholes?
Sessions and Wray were the best picks for their jobs, according to retarded dipfucks that are unable to form their own opinions about anything without governmental permission.
OP is a faggot. Obvious shill is obvious
The reverse is also true. We need to call out our own bullshit when we fuck up and Trump is right. Moore and Sessions comes to mind.
First national politician to endorse Trump. Very strong anti-illegal rhetoric as a Senator.
Hey man, if you want a pro lockdown authoritarian on the court for life that's on you.
I just want the NFA to be kill.
I mean I support Trump 110% but we can’t afford another Roberts which is what ACB will be. He needs to pick that based Cuban woman IMO
Hear hear. This is also my worry. She could potentially be another Roberts as she may he compromised by her past which would lead to blackmail. She has a big family, she’s got a lot to lose.
Based Anti-Commie Cuban FTW.
Agreed. Trust Sessions!
I would prefer a Protestant (given the country is 2/3 Proddie but has not a single SCOTUS seat and hasn't in over a decade).
BUT
Getting rid of Abortion and protecting gun rights is more important than proportional identity representation.
Hey OP, youre a faggot
Sure sure let’s just have 9 women up there making all the decisions and see how that turns out.
I can't wait to see all the catfights and spilt wine
Anyone can make a bad choice, and Trump has made bad appointments before. I don’t have a strong opinion on this one, but the “Trump is literally incapable of making a mistake” circlejerk is not that much better than the doom and gloom one you’re responding to.
I understand the instinct to protect our President from criticism because of the Alps worth of shit thrown at him, but we can’t turn in to those we loath. We simply cannot throw aside reason and opinions because we don’t agree with Trump or each other.
Speak your mind fellow Pedes.
The two SCOTUS picks he’s already made have been meh at best. More liberal that I was expecting. One of his selections gave half of Oklahoma back to the Indians. 😂
Jeff Sessions and Christopher Wray say hi
"concern trolls" 🤔 Only a faggot would use such wording on a POLITICAL social media platform... Let me guess... You are also ok with 1% running hollywood, MSM and the banks... "concern 4chan troll, it doesn matter they own the big banks, hollywood, MSM and voted in the central bank in 1913... STOP BEING ANTI SEMITIC!"-Some pussified brainwashed faggot that hurts our society
I don't want ACB, but I defer to Trump's judgement and won't undermine his choice with excessive bitching when he picks her.
This is not concern trolling, this is called having a brain and opinions.
Jeff sessions has entered the chat...
He's picked bad people before and admitted to it, hell there is tell all books from many out there.
It's good to be optimistic, but blindly following is the definition of a democrat
Anyone Trump picks is the right one, as long as it's Alex Jones.
If she screws Trump if the election goes to SCOTUS, then Heritage Foundation.
I always thought concern troll was a leftist soy boy term, can't stand it.
Fuck this sheep ass post. What differs me from the left is the fact that I don’t blindly follow ANYONE. Fuck this post and any sheep that upvotes it. This comes from the soy Jeb bush side of conservatives and fuck all of you.
Jeff Sessions? Wray? This is one he can't fire.
Preach brotha! Preach!
Bro i support Trump but your post is some beta male level dick riding faggotry man. Gorsuch gave us trannies in schools and hate crime laws. How about you stop being a mindless sycophant and realize trump is capable of msking poor choices just like anyone else, this scotus pick being an example.
Right on! I've told a few people this myself when they say "well his dad gave him a million dollars" and I'm like "really? So each time you get a paycheck you're guaranteed to be a millionaire"? Cause making 1,000,000,000 from 1,000,000 is essentially the same as making 1,000,000 from 1,000. And I guarantee you you're not going to make a million dollars (or if you do it's not because you have 1,000 dollars now)
Dude....not even. $1000 dollars your’e sitting at the kids table. No way to acquire real estate or stock options. Your basically buying an ounce of blow and selling 20 bags. With $1,000,000 you can actually sit at the grown up table and get that money working for you. Not saying it’s easy but at least it’s possible.
That’s ridiculous. Like $1,000 gets you nothing but $1,000,000 buys you a seat at the big boys table and guarantees you a billion (thousand million)
You can’t sit at the big boys table with $1,000. But you can’t sit at the super big boys table with $1,000,000 either.
Yes, it takes a long time to go from $1,000 to $1,000,000 with lots of incremental transactions along the way all with the potential for loss...
just like it takes lots of time, skill, and savvy to go from $1,000,000 to $1,000,000,000 with lots of incremental transactions along the way all with the potential for loss.
Trump starting with a million dollars in no way guaranteed he’d end up with a billion.
But that’s the argument you seem to be making... “because he got to sit at the big boys table”
And you literally said going from a milllion to a billion was passionless. Like Trump hasn’t shown more passion than almost any public figure you could conceivably name. Both in his presidency and even before (there’s a reason he was a household name)
Give me a break
Damn autocorrect, it was to read possible. We all know the Don has passion. And a million does not get you a seat at the big big boy table, I get that. It’s just a far more advantageous position to be in, and not the same in my opinion as just having $1000.
I agree, it is a far more advantageous position to be in. But a billion is a much higher hurdle to reach too.
If you can find a way to double a thousand to two thousand why can you not, in theory, do it again? and again 1,000 times.
Just like you’d have to do to your first million a thousand times to reach a billion.
And it’s not that hard to turn a thousand into two thousand. People do it all the time.
My next door neighbors basically live off buying and selling junk and fixing it up. People start Amazon accounts selling stuff they buy at thrift stores and make a living off of it.
It’s not easy. But it’s not harder than making consistently profitable real estate deals.
And that’s not even to mention that you can get into real estate with 1,000 bucks too. I bought an option on a house once for a hundred bucks. If I could have found a buyer in the two month option period I would have pocketed the money I sold it for (in excess of my optioned price)... it’s called flipping houses.
I didn’t because that wasn’t my goal. But the point is that you don’t need a million dollars to make money in real estate.
And it’s no harder to turn $1,000 into $2,000 than it is to turn 1,000,000 into 2,000,000. And on from there.
Wah wah I didn't get exactly the judge I wanted and only someone who'll stand for 95% of everything I believe!
Every time I question the man he shows me he was right. Every time. This time I’ll listen to him👍
Concern trolls abound. All cantcunts and do nuthins.
Deport deport deport.
good beats
SCALIA PICKED BARRETT
that is all
I trust his pick. If she's the one, full steam ahead, no brakes!
Wish I had more than one upvote to give you ...
What's your point?
Exactly
You are fake news.
No, not at all. He said it his last 2 rallies.
No, he didn't. You are fake news..
He absolutely said it. He said it again last night at the rally in Newport News, VA.
Yet you can't point it out, because it doesn't exist, because you are fake news.
Watch the rally yourself:
https://youtu.be/dR0M-92na4U?t=10017
I did watch it. That's how I'm so certain it doesn't exist. You are fake news.
2:48:37-2:49:04, here ya go fuck face.
And he says, "I give us an A to an A+."
Still waiting, fake news....
He said it last night
Wrong.
And watch, I'll ask you to give me the time frame on his last speech where he said that and you'll just, poof, mysteriously disappear, because you know it doesn't exist and you are fake news.
https://youtu.be/dR0M-92na4U
2:48:37-2:49:04, here ya go fuck face.
Prepare for disappoint. Watch it for yourself you lazy fuck, fucking time frame my ass.
Shocker! You can't point it out. because it doesn't exist. You are fake news.
Yes, he's definitely not changing it for me (although I do believe in a way he did make it for me, and for all of us, sincerely from his heart, because that's Trump), and I am glad for today, because RBG is dead and ACB will probably be at least marginally better, even if she turns out to be an authoritarian big government trojan horse. And I do trust Trump, because I've made the mistake of not doing so in the past and been proven wrong. And because I believe that he is a gift from God and a divine intervention. And most of all because I believe he is a good man who genuinely loves America. And because there is no better option.
But I still consider you to be a mindless shill who is all that could become wrong with the current agenda to Make America Great Again... marginalizing anyone who disagrees with you, even if it's genuine concern over a lifetime appointment by a fallible human man. This isn't Trumps fight, it's our fight. (even Trump knows that do you), and we have cause to be concerned. Which does not make us "concern trolls". It makes us human. And shows how invested we are in this struggle for what we love (America).
Fuck you and your "low energy" insults and "concern trolling" accusations, from someone who 100% supports Trump, and will give him the benefit of the doubt on any nomination even if I am worried.
There's a reason that crowds say they love Trump, literally tell him that they love him... but it's not because they think he is an infallible God... actually it's because they know that he is not, but that he is fighting just like they are.
Getting pretty tired of you faggots telling us what to think.