You made the claim that she isn't. You're not proving a negative. Show me a track record that shows she's not. The deep state is pushing for her nomination.
Idiocy. Wait until you see how hard the left fights against this pick. All you need is a little logic to know your statement is crap. She’s not deep state. If she were, they attacks wouldn’t be so viscous. They are already attacking her kids and the legitimacy of her adoptions.
A source is not an opinion. What's the evidence for your claim ?
I didn't make the claim. You claim that ACB is a deep state hack. The burden of proof is on you. I cannot prove a negative.
You made the claim that she isn't. You're not proving a negative. Show me a track record that shows she's not. The deep state is pushing for her nomination.
No you don't understand. The burden of proof is on you. I cannot prove a negative.
I've read her case history. I've listened to Barnes' video and read all of his tweets for the last 2 weeks. His case is EXTREMELY weak.
It's not a negative. In a debate.. you have to prove your side. You're saying she is a solid pick for Trump. On what basis?
Idiocy. Wait until you see how hard the left fights against this pick. All you need is a little logic to know your statement is crap. She’s not deep state. If she were, they attacks wouldn’t be so viscous. They are already attacking her kids and the legitimacy of her adoptions.
They're going to attack whoever he picks, no matter what.