You made the claim that she isn't. You're not proving a negative. Show me a track record that shows she's not. The deep state is pushing for her nomination.
-Federalist Society vetted. That's a baseline, NOT a guarantee. Points to her being textualist / originalist
-Strong on 2A. Ruled that even a nonviolent felon shouldn't have their 2A rights taken away
-Clerked for Scalia
-Abortion rights: Barrett has written that Supreme Court precedents are not sacrosanct, which liberals have interpreted as a threat to the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion nationwide.
-Affordable Care Act: Barrett wrote in 2017 that Chief Justice John Roberts pushed the Affordable Care Act beyond its plausible meaning in order to save it.
-Immigration: In a dissent, Barrett defended the Trump administration's rule denying immigrants permanent residence if they become regular users of public assistance.
Can keep going right down the list. She's solid on them all.
Idiocy. Wait until you see how hard the left fights against this pick. All you need is a little logic to know your statement is crap. She’s not deep state. If she were, they attacks wouldn’t be so viscous. They are already attacking her kids and the legitimacy of her adoptions.
You made the claim that she isn't. You're not proving a negative. Show me a track record that shows she's not. The deep state is pushing for her nomination.
No you don't understand. The burden of proof is on you. I cannot prove a negative.
I've read her case history. I've listened to Barnes' video and read all of his tweets for the last 2 weeks. His case is EXTREMELY weak.
It's not a negative. In a debate.. you have to prove your side. You're saying she is a solid pick for Trump. On what basis?
-Federalist Society vetted. That's a baseline, NOT a guarantee. Points to her being textualist / originalist
-Strong on 2A. Ruled that even a nonviolent felon shouldn't have their 2A rights taken away
-Clerked for Scalia
-Abortion rights: Barrett has written that Supreme Court precedents are not sacrosanct, which liberals have interpreted as a threat to the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion nationwide.
-Affordable Care Act: Barrett wrote in 2017 that Chief Justice John Roberts pushed the Affordable Care Act beyond its plausible meaning in order to save it.
-Immigration: In a dissent, Barrett defended the Trump administration's rule denying immigrants permanent residence if they become regular users of public assistance.
Can keep going right down the list. She's solid on them all.
Idiocy. Wait until you see how hard the left fights against this pick. All you need is a little logic to know your statement is crap. She’s not deep state. If she were, they attacks wouldn’t be so viscous. They are already attacking her kids and the legitimacy of her adoptions.
They're going to attack whoever he picks, no matter what.
I guess you missed the part about attacking children and a mother. It’s a line they wouldn’t cross unless they truly didn’t want her to be a SCJ.
They're gonna attack whoever it is. Trump could nominate RGBs corpse and they'd complain.