4704 Whoever the SCOTUS pick is, should be voted on directly without any "Judiciary Committee" hearings. The democrats have lost their right to participate in a fair and vibrant democracy. Only reason they want a hearing is to tarnish the nominee's reputation (media.patriots.win) posted 201 days ago by SirDonaldJTrump 201 days ago by SirDonaldJTrump +4705 / -1 245 comments share 245 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (245) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 23 ▼ – dontUseVinegerAsLube 23 points 201 days ago +26 / -3 Isn't that the case for Lagoa and Rushing too? permalink save report block reply ▲ 14 ▼ – TrumpVictorious 14 points 201 days ago +15 / -1 Yep permalink save report block reply ▲ 5 ▼ – deleted 5 points 201 days ago +5 / -0 ▲ 7 ▼ – deleted 7 points 201 days ago +7 / -0 ▲ 5 ▼ – spezisacuckold 5 points 201 days ago +5 / -0 38 guarantees 30-40 years as a Justice. That’s INCREDIBLY powerful for a court with an average tenure of 16 years. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 4 ▼ – deleted 4 points 201 days ago +4 / -0 ▲ 4 ▼ – VelveetaJohnson 4 points 201 days ago +4 / -0 Breyer isn’t stepping down. He’s a male RBG. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 4 ▼ – VelveetaJohnson 4 points 201 days ago +5 / -1 In other words, Tuck or Rand Paul will have to appoint his successor in 2024-32. permalink save report block reply
Isn't that the case for Lagoa and Rushing too?
Yep
38 guarantees 30-40 years as a Justice. That’s INCREDIBLY powerful for a court with an average tenure of 16 years.
Breyer isn’t stepping down. He’s a male RBG.
In other words, Tuck or Rand Paul will have to appoint his successor in 2024-32.