4704
Comments (245)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
48
TrumpVictorious 48 points ago +48 / -0

Prior to the 1950s, SCOTUS nominees almost never had to testify. Their written judicial opinions formed the substance of debate in the senate.

Then they started calling nominees to testify. Some would simply say “my record speaks for itself.” But others started elaborating. Soon the senate testimonies became routine, but were respectful.

Then with judge Bork, who was eminently qualified, the left realized it could start using the hearings to trash nominees and prevent their appointment. And here we are.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
4
nutup_orshutup 4 points ago +4 / -0

And Bork becomes a verb.