Telling me to shut the fuck up in all caps while providing nothing but a repetitive demand for an unreasonable level of justification of my healthy skepticism that ACB is not potentially another Roberts in disguise, while every RINO in the senate reverses their opposition to a pre-election appointment...
All while telling me that rulings she concurred with don’t count because they aren’t in her own words...
is proof to me that you are a totally disingenuous shill. LOL
Right back at ya.
Telling me to shut the fuck up in all caps while providing nothing but a repetitive demand for an unreasonable level of justification of my healthy skepticism that ACB is not potentially another Roberts in disguise, while every RINO in the senate reverses their opposition to a pre-election appointment...
All while telling me that rulings she concurred with don’t count because they aren’t in her own words...
is proof to me that you are a totally disingenuous shill. LOL
I am not asking for an unreasonable level of justification for your skepticism
I am asking for a SINGLE CONCERNING DECISION WRITTEN BY BARRETT
If you can’t provide that simple requirement as the basis of your opinion the your opinion has no basis and your skepticism is not in fact healthy.