Yeah judges include passing and inconsequential references in their rulings all the time. And then other judges concur with those decisions but that doesn’t reflect on their judgment or positions because they only agreed with part of the decision and certainly not the “passing and inconsequential” justifications it contained.
Yeah judges include passing and inconsequential references in their rulings all the time. And then other judges concur with those decisions but that doesn’t reflect on their judgment or positions because they only agreed with part of the decision and certainly not the “passing and inconsequential” justifications it contained.
You’re an idiot.
No, I’m not. I’m interested in a substantive argument that includes a basis in an actual decision written by Barrett.
Fuck you, demon.