12 Where is the evidence ACB is pro forced vaccinations and pro lockdown? posted 203 days ago by Daisymae 203 days ago by Daisymae +12 / -0 I'm not finding any sources for those complaints 8 comments share 8 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (8) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 1 ▼ – Jaybone86 1 point 203 days ago +1 / -0 She cited Jacobsen V. Massachusetts in the Pritzker V. GOP ruling. permalink save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – Daisymae [S] 2 points 203 days ago +2 / -0 That ruling was specifically about disparate treatment of two groups, not forced vaccinations or the lockdown. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – Jaybone86 1 point 203 days ago +1 / -0 Jacobsen v. Massachusetts was about compulsory vaccinations. In that decision the court decided governments could have fairly wide latitude in ordering compulsory vaccination. This was cited as a reason for denying the gop motion for pritzker. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – Daisymae [S] 1 point 203 days ago +1 / -0 I meant the pritzker ruling was about the disparate treatment of groups under the lockdown. Citing Jacobsen was with regards to state power. permalink parent save report block reply
She cited Jacobsen V. Massachusetts in the Pritzker V. GOP ruling.
That ruling was specifically about disparate treatment of two groups, not forced vaccinations or the lockdown.
Jacobsen v. Massachusetts was about compulsory vaccinations. In that decision the court decided governments could have fairly wide latitude in ordering compulsory vaccination. This was cited as a reason for denying the gop motion for pritzker.
I meant the pritzker ruling was about the disparate treatment of groups under the lockdown. Citing Jacobsen was with regards to state power.