Could have been trying to chase someone off who was accosting him. That's the most likely scenario given the context.
Bottom line is: This was obviously confrontational, and they were trying to block this guy from leaving. When you refuse someone the ability to retreat from an altercation, you give him license to do whatever he has to in order to escape.
Totally agree, but from the video it seems like it went:
Driver A gets out of the car, and switches with Driver B. Driver A then just walks away into the crow. Weird, and can't be that threatening if they are waltzing in and out of the car.
Driver B jolts forwards for unknown reasons, pushing into the crow, which in turn causes ...
Crowd to go wild, turn on car and smash back window, which in turn causes ...
Second plowing into crow, which is where I agree they gotta get the fuck out of there.
So we need more context for what lead to 2), because it would shift most of the blame for what happened thereafter.
If an angry mob surrounds you and tries to block you from leaving, you have every right to feel threatened.
If you feel threatened then why did you get out of the car? You've got to be a complete idiot to do that.
Could have been trying to chase someone off who was accosting him. That's the most likely scenario given the context.
Bottom line is: This was obviously confrontational, and they were trying to block this guy from leaving. When you refuse someone the ability to retreat from an altercation, you give him license to do whatever he has to in order to escape.
Totally agree, but from the video it seems like it went:
Driver A gets out of the car, and switches with Driver B. Driver A then just walks away into the crow. Weird, and can't be that threatening if they are waltzing in and out of the car.
Driver B jolts forwards for unknown reasons, pushing into the crow, which in turn causes ...
Crowd to go wild, turn on car and smash back window, which in turn causes ...
Second plowing into crow, which is where I agree they gotta get the fuck out of there.
So we need more context for what lead to 2), because it would shift most of the blame for what happened thereafter.