I don’t think CNN gives one bleep about a hint of fairness. I think CNN is pro ACB.
And while they can’t unindoctrinate all their mindless NPC followers on a dime, they can signal to those in power that it’s ok to let this one through.
Oh yeah. Lol. Not trying to be rude man but seriously laughing that CNN is worried about being sued for bias. Or that they seriously think that a single article like this or even a few like it would protect them.
It's not for legal action. Its very simple. They are saying he is hugely consequential, and they do not mean that is a good thing in their view. They are saying his actions will have consequences for decades.
This is a priming method for their future narrative. It is not nice or fair at all.
Just like how the ACLU will sometimes defend nazis and KKK so they can say:
"See ?! we defend the right as well!"
As they kick every gun owner in the butt and refuse to help. Of course saying they help nazis and KKK members helps perpetuate fantasy that there are any significant number of those groups.
Pretty much. Claiming someone is of importance does not mean that you like them or even don't hate them. It's just an objective fact. (Which doesn't mean much, considering how they feel about facts)
Pretty much. Joseph stalin was a consequential leader of russia. Doesn't mean I'm saying stalin was a good man. It's a backhanded, passive aggressive, limp wristed insult. So, par for the cnn course
"Consequential" is undoubtedly not a good thing in this case, they're probably saying that Amerikkka being the Fourth Reich by 2022 is a """consequence""" of Trump's election.
I read it and it's a negative piece. Using a somewhat neutral title for CNN is akin to clickbait for them, as the norm for them is to open with a hugely biased headline.
Today has been weird on the fake news front. I've seen less articles wrapped in marxists opinion than ever before. They must be priming themselves for election case in front of the Supreme Court.
Yes, CNN's new ploy. Other news outlets as well. Make their headline neutral or pro Trump sounding to get people to click it. Then the article is full on negativity, hidden half way through. Bait and switch.
I don’t think CNN gives one bleep about a hint of fairness. I think CNN is pro ACB.
And while they can’t unindoctrinate all their mindless NPC followers on a dime, they can signal to those in power that it’s ok to let this one through.
Possible legal action?
Oh yeah. Lol. Not trying to be rude man but seriously laughing that CNN is worried about being sued for bias. Or that they seriously think that a single article like this or even a few like it would protect them.
There’s a difference between suing someone for slander and suing them for bias.
It's not for legal action. Its very simple. They are saying he is hugely consequential, and they do not mean that is a good thing in their view. They are saying his actions will have consequences for decades.
This is a priming method for their future narrative. It is not nice or fair at all.
I'd doubt it. I'd say "not terribly unenthusiastic" at most. Hell, she said she would overturn Roe v. Wade. That's practically a litmus test for CNN.
Yes. I did mean relatively pro ACB. Not saying they love her completely. Lol
Just like how the ACLU will sometimes defend nazis and KKK so they can say:
"See ?! we defend the right as well!"
As they kick every gun owner in the butt and refuse to help. Of course saying they help nazis and KKK members helps perpetuate fantasy that there are any significant number of those groups.
It's funny because anyone that knows anything knows nazis and KKK are left wing.
Bingo. They pick some subject matter that won't hurt or help the Rats either way, in order to do just that.
No.
Pretty much. Claiming someone is of importance does not mean that you like them or even don't hate them. It's just an objective fact. (Which doesn't mean much, considering how they feel about facts)
I'm not reading the article. I'm assuming the second line is something like "...by being the president that brought fascism to the united states"
Pretty much. Joseph stalin was a consequential leader of russia. Doesn't mean I'm saying stalin was a good man. It's a backhanded, passive aggressive, limp wristed insult. So, par for the cnn course
"Consequential" is undoubtedly not a good thing in this case, they're probably saying that Amerikkka being the Fourth Reich by 2022 is a """consequence""" of Trump's election.
I read it and it's a negative piece. Using a somewhat neutral title for CNN is akin to clickbait for them, as the norm for them is to open with a hugely biased headline.
Thank you for doing our dirty work
Maybe they're tire of having lower ratings than Tim Pool from his basement and decided to not alienate most of their potential audience.
I think even the CNNers are getting tired of being expected to pretend that they believe a guy with obvious dementia would make a good POTUS.
I bet they run a few pro-trump articles and suddenly they see a giant increase in eyeballs and start going hardcore right
Today has been weird on the fake news front. I've seen less articles wrapped in marxists opinion than ever before. They must be priming themselves for election case in front of the Supreme Court.
The misspelled YUUUUG-ly
Too bad for you that the Supreme Court seems so small to the normies compared to the rest of the shit you've turned up to 11 in 2020 CNN.
This has nothing to do with being fair. Is everything to do with being a warning of sorts.
It's Cillizza. Guarantee that cocksucking homo twists the headline in the article itself.
No, don't be silly!
Yes, CNN's new ploy. Other news outlets as well. Make their headline neutral or pro Trump sounding to get people to click it. Then the article is full on negativity, hidden half way through. Bait and switch.
Uh, what? No, they’re saying he is consequential. They do not like the consequences. How could this possibly be construed as bending the knee?
Hugely consequential. Might even say he's "big league".
Let the left taste the shaft and the balls on this story.
And Obama cries in his sleep
They are talking about the fact that he has appointed 3 to the Supreme Court