Ok but check this out: christianity is the only religion where the focus is on love and forgiveness. All the other religions are focused on worshipping cows or covering up yr women in blankets or meditating or some other stupid shit. That has to mean something, right?
The 'synoptic problem' is the seminary version liberal academia's attempts to reinvent reality to suit their vision. It is pushed by individuals with an a priori disregard for the authenticity of Scripture.
In a court of law, do we consider the agreement of witness statements to be a problem? Of course not. We consider that evidence that the witness testimony is reliable.
If three friends all tell you they had a good meal at a particular restaurant, do you immediately jump to the conclusion that there must have been a fourth friend - one you have never met - who actually went to the restaurant, so you can't possibly trust their accounts? No, that would be utterly ridiculous.
The 'synoptic problem' is not an actual problem for theologians, lay or professional. The Gospel of John doesn't even have any meaningful differences, or contradictions; rather, John focuses on certain truths and events over the ones the other Gospels centered on. If you disagree, go ahead and list meaningful discrepancies. Take your time. I'll wait.
I am not here to convince you or change your mind. It is a choice. Are you an agnostic, atheist or just like to debate.
I believe in God. I just don't believe Jesus is God.
Ok but check this out: christianity is the only religion where the focus is on love and forgiveness. All the other religions are focused on worshipping cows or covering up yr women in blankets or meditating or some other stupid shit. That has to mean something, right?
Interesting point.
https://youtu.be/ytyntyd2fTw
Please watch It’s short and these guys are very understandable and knowledgeable. I hope you find this extremely important truth.
18 years a Christian, same. The Gospel of John and the "synoptic problem" helps you realise how stupid the cult is.
The 'synoptic problem' is the seminary version liberal academia's attempts to reinvent reality to suit their vision. It is pushed by individuals with an a priori disregard for the authenticity of Scripture.
In a court of law, do we consider the agreement of witness statements to be a problem? Of course not. We consider that evidence that the witness testimony is reliable.
If three friends all tell you they had a good meal at a particular restaurant, do you immediately jump to the conclusion that there must have been a fourth friend - one you have never met - who actually went to the restaurant, so you can't possibly trust their accounts? No, that would be utterly ridiculous.
The 'synoptic problem' is not an actual problem for theologians, lay or professional. The Gospel of John doesn't even have any meaningful differences, or contradictions; rather, John focuses on certain truths and events over the ones the other Gospels centered on. If you disagree, go ahead and list meaningful discrepancies. Take your time. I'll wait.
Holy Fuck, the social dissonance!
https://www.learnreligions.com/comparing-john-and-the-synoptic-gospels-363395
You must be a lay theologian.
I’ve got news fo ya bud: you are not a Christian.
And no this is not a “no true Scotsman” argument. By definition, if you do not believe that Jesus is the son of God, then you are not a Christian.
Jesus is the Son of the god Ba'al.