You didn't even ask where the rain on Mars comes from. The answer would be it is urinated out by a magical Martian dragon that no one has ever seen, but if I shave my mustache the dragon stops urinating for some reason.
The church told him that he shouldn’t masturbate. To the atheist, that is the church hurting him.
"The church" is entitled to its opinion - it does not hurt me.
Masturbation is harmful to people who have potential of finding a mate.
Masturbation is beneficial to people who choose or must remain celibate - and want to control their emotions and urges, lest they lead to a greater sin.
Man. You should study philosophy so that you can engage in actual substantive debate about things humans have pondered since the first human.
Being someone who dismisses it out of hand with utterly ridiculous mockery doesn’t make you smart or persuasive, it proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that you are a complete buffoon.
There is more logic behind there being a Creator than not.
There's zero "logic" to there being a "creator", because to "create" that "creator" you need another "creator", and so forth. Your pre-programmed answer is that the "creator" is magic, but that has nothing to do with "logic".
Furthermore, this "creator" would have to deliberately have created a universe with evidence for emergent processes (like biological evolution) and no evidence for a creator.
You didn't even ask where the rain on Mars comes from. The answer would be it is urinated out by a magical Martian dragon that no one has ever seen, but if I shave my mustache the dragon stops urinating for some reason.
Fedora tipping intensifies
You’re not even making sense, buddy. You’re not even making sense of what I’m trying to explain. Did the church hurt you or something?
The church told him that he shouldn’t masturbate. To the atheist, that is the church hurting him.
"The church" is entitled to its opinion - it does not hurt me.
Masturbation is harmful to people who have potential of finding a mate.
Masturbation is beneficial to people who choose or must remain celibate - and want to control their emotions and urges, lest they lead to a greater sin.
I've demonstrated, by analogy, the absurdity of that "sacrifice" claim.
To a rational person that hasn't been programmed it makes zero sense.
No, it didn't. I'm actually a big fan of many Christian programs. But I don't agree with your supernatural claims.
Man. You should study philosophy so that you can engage in actual substantive debate about things humans have pondered since the first human.
Being someone who dismisses it out of hand with utterly ridiculous mockery doesn’t make you smart or persuasive, it proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that you are a complete buffoon.
I do study philosophy, and I do engage in actual substantive debate. But if my arguments go over your head - that isn't my fault.
I’ll pray for you
There's zero "logic" to there being a "creator", because to "create" that "creator" you need another "creator", and so forth. Your pre-programmed answer is that the "creator" is magic, but that has nothing to do with "logic".
Furthermore, this "creator" would have to deliberately have created a universe with evidence for emergent processes (like biological evolution) and no evidence for a creator.
I am a full-time scholar. Specifically "research" do you want me to read?