3996
Comments (484)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
TheDaoOfSalt 1 point ago +2 / -1

Is that supposed to be some sort of backhanded ad hominem? Neither that nor the expletives are necessary. unless your intent is to undermine your credibility to other readers.

What are your specific arguments? That article is full of fairly general ones, and some rather speculative assumptions about dating. Which is to say, the entire framework of the argument presented is soaked in atheistic, liberal propositions that assume Scripture cannot be accurate and Christ cannot be God.

So I ask again, what are your specific arguments?

-2
HCQaddict -2 points ago +1 / -3
1
TheDaoOfSalt 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's not even defensible by secular scholarship or religious history, let alone Christian theology. Your wikipedia link - already a questionable source of scholarly information - doesn't even mention Jehovah.

So far you've made a number of extreme claims. When asked to back them up, you've posted links to low quality articles of dubious scholarship, and refrained from answering any questions with specifics or reasoning.

This is very much a pearls and swine situation. I don't say that to insult you. But you're coming out swinging with the same kind of energy as this fellow: https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2019/09/9ff3a93c-f75f-4adf-a10e-8b54cbc8449a.jpeg

I'd say about the same amount of intellectually honest theology as well.

1
HCQaddict 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hey, i noticed you nor anyone else actually asked any questions. Fuck outta here.

1
TheDaoOfSalt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Apparently you didn't read my responses, then. Seriously. Look at the last paragraph of both my first and second response.

Please try to be better, this is embarassing.