As in legally binding? Yes it's absolutely legally binding. That's not in dispute by anyone and we have 233 years of legal and historical precedent to confirm that.
Not valid as in you don't like it, and in your opinion it's a bad thing? Well, You're entitled to that opinion, via the legally binding constitution.
Does it really though? Your rights recognized in the constitution still exist when you are alone in the woods with just you and nature, and no government to influence anything.
The way I see it is the constitution does 2 things... 1.) Recognizes and affirms your natural rights that already exist. Rights that you have by nature (or God given as the founders put it).....
And 2.) Lays out the organization of a government that will not infringe on those rights.
Even without that organization layer of the constitution being applicable (ie you are alone in the woods) the natural rights still exist. Moreover, when you are alone in the woods there is no possibility for a government to infringe on your natural rights anyways, So that layer isn't relevant to you.
But if you come down off the mountains, into society, where there is a government and other people to interact with, The constitution demands that your natural rights be respected and protected.
So even when you are away from government control, Your constitutional rights are EVEN STRONGER, not weaker.
Your problem is you take things too literally. To understand Christ and all the teachings of Christianity, you need a teacher. This stuff is too easy to misunderstand. To assume you know all these things after independent reading is utmost arrogance.
it is possible to be divinely inspired by god to do your own independent analysis.
however jesus is not lucifer and jehova is not ba'al. thats basically like what upper eschelon freemason's interpret it as. which is different from gnostic luciferians who actually believe god is a lying tyrant and lucifer rebelled for a good reason to free mankind and give them knowledge.
all of those interpretations are false. but thats where his idea comes from, idk if he independently came to the idea or actually was taught by them to believe it.
one does not need the churches directly to study. not anymore especially with the bible being publicly available and tons of sources to analyze and compare/contrast yourself from home online.
a lot of times teachers can be dead wrong.
a good example is the westboro baptist church. While homosexuality is a sin and abortion is clearly wrong, the methods they go about protesting the things are anti-christ.
christ himself said the only unforgivable sin is blasphemy against the holy spirit (essentially even murder, in gods eyes, is equivalent to excessive drinking by new testament standards where the old law of stoning people to death no longer applies)
he also said “Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? 4 How can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when all the time there is a plank in your own eye? 5 You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye"
so believe it or not many churches fall prey to false teachings.
last night on youtube I specifically saw a pastor committing heresy by claiming the types of food you eat affect salvation. Yes fast food is bad for you, but again according to jesus himself "[10] And he called the multitude, and said unto them, Hear, and understand: [11] Not that which goeth into the mouth defileth a man; but that which cometh out of the mouth, this defileth a man."
I never said it’s impossible. It’s just highly unlikely. Jesus himself had no teacher and arrived at these conclusions independently. But to proclaim that you can do it without guidance is incredibly arrogant.
Of course there will be false teachers. I was only referring to guidance by real teachers.
I’m gonna be real honest with you for a sec. you sound like an incredibly arrogant guy who’s just trying to show off knowledge. I don’t give a fuck if you’re the person who unearthed the Dead Sea scrolls. If you approach any “debate” with the intent of proving you are right, then you’re already lost.
I'll debate you! What you do you wanna talk about?
Next, let's do this one:
Conservatives are their own worst enemies because they uphold a document created to enslave them.
How?
A conservative swears to uphold a fraudulent document
https://www.federaljack.com/slavery-by-consent-the-united-states-corporation/
I want you to take the position that the US Constitution is valid.
I'll start:
The US Constitution isn't valid.
What about the repeal of the 1871 territorial government in 1874?
Define: Valid.
As in legally binding? Yes it's absolutely legally binding. That's not in dispute by anyone and we have 233 years of legal and historical precedent to confirm that.
Not valid as in you don't like it, and in your opinion it's a bad thing? Well, You're entitled to that opinion, via the legally binding constitution.
Remember this. I was censored.
I'm an atheist.. Would you care to debate if any of those characters even exist?
LMAO. Good joke
Takes a valid government to validate it.
Does it really though? Your rights recognized in the constitution still exist when you are alone in the woods with just you and nature, and no government to influence anything.
The way I see it is the constitution does 2 things... 1.) Recognizes and affirms your natural rights that already exist. Rights that you have by nature (or God given as the founders put it).....
And 2.) Lays out the organization of a government that will not infringe on those rights.
Even without that organization layer of the constitution being applicable (ie you are alone in the woods) the natural rights still exist. Moreover, when you are alone in the woods there is no possibility for a government to infringe on your natural rights anyways, So that layer isn't relevant to you.
But if you come down off the mountains, into society, where there is a government and other people to interact with, The constitution demands that your natural rights be respected and protected.
So even when you are away from government control, Your constitutional rights are EVEN STRONGER, not weaker.
Your problem is you take things too literally. To understand Christ and all the teachings of Christianity, you need a teacher. This stuff is too easy to misunderstand. To assume you know all these things after independent reading is utmost arrogance.
I disagree with both of you.
it is possible to be divinely inspired by god to do your own independent analysis.
however jesus is not lucifer and jehova is not ba'al. thats basically like what upper eschelon freemason's interpret it as. which is different from gnostic luciferians who actually believe god is a lying tyrant and lucifer rebelled for a good reason to free mankind and give them knowledge.
all of those interpretations are false. but thats where his idea comes from, idk if he independently came to the idea or actually was taught by them to believe it.
one does not need the churches directly to study. not anymore especially with the bible being publicly available and tons of sources to analyze and compare/contrast yourself from home online.
a lot of times teachers can be dead wrong.
a good example is the westboro baptist church. While homosexuality is a sin and abortion is clearly wrong, the methods they go about protesting the things are anti-christ.
christ himself said the only unforgivable sin is blasphemy against the holy spirit (essentially even murder, in gods eyes, is equivalent to excessive drinking by new testament standards where the old law of stoning people to death no longer applies)
he also said “Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? 4 How can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when all the time there is a plank in your own eye? 5 You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye"
so believe it or not many churches fall prey to false teachings.
last night on youtube I specifically saw a pastor committing heresy by claiming the types of food you eat affect salvation. Yes fast food is bad for you, but again according to jesus himself "[10] And he called the multitude, and said unto them, Hear, and understand: [11] Not that which goeth into the mouth defileth a man; but that which cometh out of the mouth, this defileth a man."
I never said it’s impossible. It’s just highly unlikely. Jesus himself had no teacher and arrived at these conclusions independently. But to proclaim that you can do it without guidance is incredibly arrogant.
Of course there will be false teachers. I was only referring to guidance by real teachers.
Yeah. A teacher. Who was the righteous teacher in the dead sea scrolls?
I’m gonna be real honest with you for a sec. you sound like an incredibly arrogant guy who’s just trying to show off knowledge. I don’t give a fuck if you’re the person who unearthed the Dead Sea scrolls. If you approach any “debate” with the intent of proving you are right, then you’re already lost.
You made 0 attempts to understand my POV.
Yahweh, and Jehovah are 2 separate Desert Gods. Do a little historical research on it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baal_Cycle
Not exactly.