As in legally binding? Yes it's absolutely legally binding. That's not in dispute by anyone and we have 233 years of legal and historical precedent to confirm that.
Not valid as in you don't like it, and in your opinion it's a bad thing? Well, You're entitled to that opinion, via the legally binding constitution.
Does it really though? Your rights recognized in the constitution still exist when you are alone in the woods with just you and nature, and no government to influence anything.
The way I see it is the constitution does 2 things... 1.) Recognizes and affirms your natural rights that already exist. Rights that you have by nature (or God given as the founders put it).....
And 2.) Lays out the organization of a government that will not infringe on those rights.
Even without that organization layer of the constitution being applicable (ie you are alone in the woods) the natural rights still exist. Moreover, when you are alone in the woods there is no possibility for a government to infringe on your natural rights anyways, So that layer isn't relevant to you.
But if you come down off the mountains, into society, where there is a government and other people to interact with, The constitution demands that your natural rights be respected and protected.
So even when you are away from government control, Your constitutional rights are EVEN STRONGER, not weaker.
Thosee "founders" were the antifederalists who put natural rights in there and they didn't want a constitution in the first place.
That organization of government is the wrong form of government to actually preserve those rights that they naturally infringe on. If a government 'owns' those woods you are alone in can you settle there? Your atheism is showing, my constitutional rights aren't stronger than the God (who your shithole government has to recognize) who gave them to me.
https://www.federaljack.com/slavery-by-consent-the-united-states-corporation/
I want you to take the position that the US Constitution is valid.
I'll start:
The US Constitution isn't valid.
What about the repeal of the 1871 territorial government in 1874?
Define: Valid.
As in legally binding? Yes it's absolutely legally binding. That's not in dispute by anyone and we have 233 years of legal and historical precedent to confirm that.
Not valid as in you don't like it, and in your opinion it's a bad thing? Well, You're entitled to that opinion, via the legally binding constitution.
Remember this. I was censored.
I'm an atheist.. Would you care to debate if any of those characters even exist?
Sure! I'll take the position that Lucifer is Venus and Jesus is Lucifer.
LMAO. Good joke
Takes a valid government to validate it.
Does it really though? Your rights recognized in the constitution still exist when you are alone in the woods with just you and nature, and no government to influence anything.
The way I see it is the constitution does 2 things... 1.) Recognizes and affirms your natural rights that already exist. Rights that you have by nature (or God given as the founders put it).....
And 2.) Lays out the organization of a government that will not infringe on those rights.
Even without that organization layer of the constitution being applicable (ie you are alone in the woods) the natural rights still exist. Moreover, when you are alone in the woods there is no possibility for a government to infringe on your natural rights anyways, So that layer isn't relevant to you.
But if you come down off the mountains, into society, where there is a government and other people to interact with, The constitution demands that your natural rights be respected and protected.
So even when you are away from government control, Your constitutional rights are EVEN STRONGER, not weaker.
Great work!
Thosee "founders" were the antifederalists who put natural rights in there and they didn't want a constitution in the first place.
That organization of government is the wrong form of government to actually preserve those rights that they naturally infringe on. If a government 'owns' those woods you are alone in can you settle there? Your atheism is showing, my constitutional rights aren't stronger than the God (who your shithole government has to recognize) who gave them to me.