So if you don’t need a fancy algorithm to “know”, why are you still relevant, Nate?
If it’s so obvious, you’re the last person I need to hear such a statement from.
The media loves sucking this nerd's dick because he very accurately predicted the elections of Obongo at a state-by-state level. I don't think it's that impressive when Obongo's victories were two of the biggest foregone conclusions of all time.
Silver was wrong in 2016. That's all that matters.
Also the Republicans including Romney threw the election. A bunch of republicans did stupid ass shit that got on the news during election season which hurt Romney as well.
Romney also never really went after Obama or even had his people go after him.
The GOP let it happen. They pushed Romney to basically not attack the last month of the campaign. Hell Huckabee would have won more than the 22 states that McCain won in 2008. Romney raised $483mil and won 206 electoral votes. GEOTUS raised $350mil in 2016 and won 304 electoral votes.
Uhhh wrong, he uses MATH and SCIENCE. So much so he went back to his calculations in 2016 and found the magical "variable" that made his results a lot more correct. So SCIENCE wins again.
Oh and mail in ballots are totally 100% safe. We did the science behind that too.
Nate Silver says that Biden will have more than enough votes. That's good to know because there is a pandemic out there and typical Democrats can be the weak and vulnerable type. They should becareful handling mail such as ballots and especially careful going out in person. For their safety many Democrat voters should remain as quarantined as possible, but they can be assured there will be enough votes for Biden because Nate Silver, an expert on saying that sort of stuff, has calculated it to be the case.
this is just wishful thinking on his part. seriously, if you listened to people who were egregiously wrong in 2016 and have continued to be wrong about so many other things...why would you put your faith in them again? why wouldn't your response be one of wariness if not actual mistrust? it's like lucy and charlie brown with the football. i never understood that.
This is what you call a hopeful conclusion. He is making projections and false conclusions to make a hopeful outcome. One he personally wants to happen.
Ruth dying help the Democrats and will for another month, then those gains are gone. Covid is actually getting better not worst. Also more people are getting tired of it. Flu season will happen, but since people aren't going to school and work sick it will be not as bad as past years. In fact expect to see some news pushed out that flu numbers are down.
Flu season actually starts around August in many places in the US. Yet there numbers are not there even though September is mostly over. In fact low early numbers are better since they lead to higher October and November numbers.
The "clock is ticking" because people are already voting. Meaning Nate expects people will change their mind on Biden given time.
Also the reason he cannot come up with any numbers supporting it means he is unable to even fake the numbers to give his desired outcome.
I believed him in 2016. I had decided on flights and was looking at dresses for Hillary’s inauguration (I have friends in DC who were planning on going and I was going to fly up from FL to go with them). Obviously I have seen the error of my ways. Apparently you can’t say the same for Nate.
So if you don’t need a fancy algorithm to “know”, why are you still relevant, Nate? If it’s so obvious, you’re the last person I need to hear such a statement from.
Nate will shill anything you want for the low low price of 30 pieces of Silver.
I guess his algorithm is kicking back answers he doesn't like
He's the Michael Phelps of being incorrect.
The media loves sucking this nerd's dick because he very accurately predicted the elections of Obongo at a state-by-state level. I don't think it's that impressive when Obongo's victories were two of the biggest foregone conclusions of all time.
Silver was wrong in 2016. That's all that matters.
One might go so far as to say it was planned failure. Republicans wanted Obongo.
Also the Republicans including Romney threw the election. A bunch of republicans did stupid ass shit that got on the news during election season which hurt Romney as well.
Romney also never really went after Obama or even had his people go after him.
The GOP let it happen. They pushed Romney to basically not attack the last month of the campaign. Hell Huckabee would have won more than the 22 states that McCain won in 2008. Romney raised $483mil and won 206 electoral votes. GEOTUS raised $350mil in 2016 and won 304 electoral votes.
After 8 years of Bush a ham sandwich could have won that election on the D side.
Uhhh wrong, he uses MATH and SCIENCE. So much so he went back to his calculations in 2016 and found the magical "variable" that made his results a lot more correct. So SCIENCE wins again.
Oh and mail in ballots are totally 100% safe. We did the science behind that too.
"I luv da maffs and siens." - Liberal college girls when they're not bending over for Tyrone
The last science class they took was chemistry in high school. They got a B-.
Nah. He'll "change" his prediction the day before the election to save face. Just like 2016.
Oh good, back to the CCPVirus may be getting worse again. I've only head that a dozen times already.
He's Baghdad Bob!
Nate Silver says that Biden will have more than enough votes. That's good to know because there is a pandemic out there and typical Democrats can be the weak and vulnerable type. They should becareful handling mail such as ballots and especially careful going out in person. For their safety many Democrat voters should remain as quarantined as possible, but they can be assured there will be enough votes for Biden because Nate Silver, an expert on saying that sort of stuff, has calculated it to be the case.
Hahahaha!
His meltdown last time was glorious. Looking forward to the reboot.
538 pushing their agenda again, I see.
I am getting tired of all this winning and Trump said we will keep on winning!
this is just wishful thinking on his part. seriously, if you listened to people who were egregiously wrong in 2016 and have continued to be wrong about so many other things...why would you put your faith in them again? why wouldn't your response be one of wariness if not actual mistrust? it's like lucy and charlie brown with the football. i never understood that.
Tell that to all the people attending Trump rallies a fucking airport hangers!!!
This is what you call a hopeful conclusion. He is making projections and false conclusions to make a hopeful outcome. One he personally wants to happen.
Ruth dying help the Democrats and will for another month, then those gains are gone. Covid is actually getting better not worst. Also more people are getting tired of it. Flu season will happen, but since people aren't going to school and work sick it will be not as bad as past years. In fact expect to see some news pushed out that flu numbers are down.
Flu season actually starts around August in many places in the US. Yet there numbers are not there even though September is mostly over. In fact low early numbers are better since they lead to higher October and November numbers.
The "clock is ticking" because people are already voting. Meaning Nate expects people will change their mind on Biden given time.
Also the reason he cannot come up with any numbers supporting it means he is unable to even fake the numbers to give his desired outcome.
He’s a pollster but not providing numbers to support his position? Even Dems should be able to figure out there’s a problem with that.
Agreed. He is in panic mode.
The is the dumbest shit I've read yet
This man lives in fantasy land.
Nate Aluminum
I fail to see how a supreme court pick would hurt his chances? Covid I could understand but that seems like a SCOTUS pick would only help him.
The covid situation may be getting worse? Another incorrect call for good ol nate.
Trump is losing badly if you believe the heavily skewed polls. Garbage in Garbage out.
Just keep digging fucktard.
Ok Nate, maybe you do need a fancy algorithm after all.
I believed him in 2016. I had decided on flights and was looking at dresses for Hillary’s inauguration (I have friends in DC who were planning on going and I was going to fly up from FL to go with them). Obviously I have seen the error of my ways. Apparently you can’t say the same for Nate.
‐ Nate Silver