Win uses cookies necessary for site functionality, as well as for personalization. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Privacy Policy.
Nah, ancient Greece was wise enough to not let everyone vote in their democracies. Had to be 30+, male, free, and landowning. They may have been super homo kiddie diddlers, but even they didn't just have a straight democracy.
There's a difference between having kiddie diddlers and it being the norm. In ancient Greece it was not only the norm, it was glorified. Best way for a kid to go up in society? Get one of the higher-up men to plough your ass. Want to be an officer? Let an officer plough your ass. Want to go into government? Let a government official plough your ass. Want to get an apprenticeship for a trade? Let a tradesman plough your ass.
Well she's against the constitution, and against republicans, so how could the USA possibly be a Constitutional Republic? That would mean that she's actively trying to go against everything it is!
No. From what I’ve found, not only is there no law against this, but since the year 1900, there’s been seven nominations to the Supreme Court during an election year, six of which were confirmed by the senate.
I would really, really like the esteemed Senator Gillibrand, who is obviously a scholar in the Constitution , to explain why "This nomination process is illegitimate." She surely says that with some basis in law.
It's because of the amendment to the Constitution that says that the rights and duties accorded to each of the branches of government shall be suspended during an election year.
I'm drawing a blank on which amendment it was... oh yes, that's right because it doesn't exist.
Hmm small world. Why do I feel like high profile politicians around the world are more likely to be pedophiles? It would be a shame if a beloved celebrity used his power to win the presidency and take out these blackmailed demons.
In 2016 when Obama tried to get Gorsuch but didn't have the Senate, RBG even said the president is elected for 4 years and not 3, so he should nominate.
No one is surprised by the left's hypocrisy any more, the news media just never reports on things they have said in the past.
The irony of it all would be that the dems would have a better case for impeachment if Trump did Not nominate someone for the Supreme Court as the constitution dictates
I thought the Republicans would be, no I’m good I don’t need to talk to the nominee, let’s vote. But the Dems doing it, this is so great, speeds it up tremendously.
The chess term is "Zugzwang": When any possible move will result in a worse board state than it currently is for you.
If she goes against it, she's against immigrants, adoption, biracial families, and diverse religions in the courts.
If she goes for it, then she makes Trump look reasonable, which of course simply cannot happen, after all, he's the Orange Man.
So there's no move she can do, except refuse to participate, which instead makes her look petulant and whiny, but leaves room for doubt on the other aspects.
Of course, there IS a winning option for her: Show up, and ask hard but very fair questions that are relevent, reasonable, and grounded in reality. You may not influence the pick/choice, but you could give a strong introduction of the mindset of the new judge to the general public while looking interested and participating in the process yourself. As long as you're not acting as an emotionally-driven psychopath having a temper tantrum, that option looks like-
Wait, nevermind, that isn't an option for her. My bad.
Isn't she the one who said during the Kavanagh confirmation, "i believe her because she's telling the truth"? In reference to the hippocampus blatantly lying accuser woman?
Tina Rutnik, installed by the governor to replace Hillary when she went to be sec state, then won a special election.....wait...who exactly is questioning who’s legitimacy?
I love how they're bitching about this, but didn't have a problem with Obama nominating one in an election year, an election he was not eligible to be re-elected, mind you. It was his Constitutional right, and it was the Senate's Constitutional right to vote "No."
They're just mad Obama didn't get his pick confirmed cause there was a Republican Senate. So they're saying that since Obama's pick didn't get confirmed, Trump doesn't get to nominate someone cause those are totally the same thing and that would only be "fair." Dems lost their chance at anything being "fair" with the shit they've pulled the last 5 years.
President doesn't stop being President when he's campaigning for re-election.
These people think "people voting=democracy." That's why they keep calling us a democracy cause they're idiots.
Does she explain why she thinks it’s illegitimate?
Feelings
This is the best Trump slogan.
Liberal Women are 100% feelings
And anti-woman
And the guys aren’t?!? Lol
She doesn't explain why she thinks it's a democracy either.
The United States of America is a constitutional republic. Where do these idiots keep getting this democracy crap from?
That lets you know they are NWO and they do not support our republic.
Anyone high up who says "our democracy" is a traitor.
They think we are ancient Greece or something.
Nah, ancient Greece was wise enough to not let everyone vote in their democracies. Had to be 30+, male, free, and landowning. They may have been super homo kiddie diddlers, but even they didn't just have a straight democracy.
There's a difference between having kiddie diddlers and it being the norm. In ancient Greece it was not only the norm, it was glorified. Best way for a kid to go up in society? Get one of the higher-up men to plough your ass. Want to be an officer? Let an officer plough your ass. Want to go into government? Let a government official plough your ass. Want to get an apprenticeship for a trade? Let a tradesman plough your ass.
Because they think "the people voting=democracy."
its in there memo to say it all the time....they want to abolish the electoral college which would not exist in a Democracy ....its a narrative
Ziiing
She is the reason our founders formed a constitutional republic
Well she's against the constitution, and against republicans, so how could the USA possibly be a Constitutional Republic? That would mean that she's actively trying to go against everything it is!
No. From what I’ve found, not only is there no law against this, but since the year 1900, there’s been seven nominations to the Supreme Court during an election year, six of which were confirmed by the senate.
"She thinks", lol.
TDS
I would really, really like the esteemed Senator Gillibrand, who is obviously a scholar in the Constitution , to explain why "This nomination process is illegitimate." She surely says that with some basis in law.
These people are sociopaths. Very scary.
She says whatever Cryin' Chuck Schumer tells her to, so you'd better ask him.
It's because of the amendment to the Constitution that says that the rights and duties accorded to each of the branches of government shall be suspended during an election year.
I'm drawing a blank on which amendment it was... oh yes, that's right because it doesn't exist.
No, it's that one that says fake last wishes by dying people overrule everything else.
Wasn't this broad's dad in NXVIM?
Yep.
I guess it’s a small world... surely another pesky coincidence that we should forget about...
Hmm small world. Why do I feel like high profile politicians around the world are more likely to be pedophiles? It would be a shame if a beloved celebrity used his power to win the presidency and take out these blackmailed demons.
Ok good. Next!
(At this rate, we'll have this wrapped up in a couple weeks)
Right?
Thanks for making it easier to ignore you, which we were going to do anyway.
Illegitimate? By following what is clearly stated in the constitution? Okay...
In 2016 when Obama tried to get Gorsuch but didn't have the Senate, RBG even said the president is elected for 4 years and not 3, so he should nominate.
No one is surprised by the left's hypocrisy any more, the news media just never reports on things they have said in the past.
We were always at war with East Asia.
Believe me, bitch, anyone who gets to get out of meeting with you is very grateful.
Great, one less person to use up talk time on the floor as the nomination is pushed through.
Fascist bitch.
Well, we know where she stands. She hates the Constitution. Don't these people have to take an oath to uphold the Constitution to take office?
Lori Lightfoot, mayor of Chicago, stated on more than one occasion that they hire people who have pledged to support the New World Order.
Global governance; good governance-- whatever they call it.
Yes. Article 6 makes this mandatory.
I believe the oath is sworn only to the donors, lobbyists, and special interest groups.
I've got Evan fact checking that right now.
The making of blatant and factually false and destructive statements should be considered sedition.
The little bitch didn't get her way. BooooHooooo!
The irony of it all would be that the dems would have a better case for impeachment if Trump did Not nominate someone for the Supreme Court as the constitution dictates
I thought the Republicans would be, no I’m good I don’t need to talk to the nominee, let’s vote. But the Dems doing it, this is so great, speeds it up tremendously.
[z]pm^;t!M;+2aNE(s{W
And? We don't need you to vote.
Does it mean she won't be delaying it?
Her dumbass being a senator is illegitimate too...
NXVIM bitch
The Constitution clearly states that when a NXVIM whore gets hurt feelings, everything thereafter becomes illegitimate.
Lol.. the won't participate because they're afraid of what they'll be asked to do which will FUCK UP THEIR ELECTION.
The chess term is "Zugzwang": When any possible move will result in a worse board state than it currently is for you.
If she goes against it, she's against immigrants, adoption, biracial families, and diverse religions in the courts.
If she goes for it, then she makes Trump look reasonable, which of course simply cannot happen, after all, he's the Orange Man.
So there's no move she can do, except refuse to participate, which instead makes her look petulant and whiny, but leaves room for doubt on the other aspects.
Of course, there IS a winning option for her: Show up, and ask hard but very fair questions that are relevent, reasonable, and grounded in reality. You may not influence the pick/choice, but you could give a strong introduction of the mindset of the new judge to the general public while looking interested and participating in the process yourself. As long as you're not acting as an emotionally-driven psychopath having a temper tantrum, that option looks like-
Wait, nevermind, that isn't an option for her. My bad.
You misspelled "cunt"
Good. Hope more Dems do the same and we can get this done fast.
Good. Will speed up the confirmation.
cool. go throw your tantrum elsewhere and do it quietly. #Trump2020
Polling just slightly higher than Bill DeBlasio. Keep that in mind.
Good, which means they are an illegitimate politician..... Her voters deserve better.
Heehaw...your voice doesnt matter...
She's a Pedophile who should have been forced to resign from the US Senate over a year ago when she announced her Failed Campaign.
What more to expect from a communist.
Bill's side piece talking about degradation. At least she knows the topic.
Refuses to participate as SHE continues to degrade our republic. What an absolute dense cunt lmao
We are a CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC!! My gosh these people.
Good. Just wastes time
Pocahontas once said the President was slut shaming her
She basically straight up called her a slut
lol
Kirsten, you dumb bitch, can you argue as to why a president doing his job degrades our Republic?
The direction she recieves from her party bosses is more important to her than the constitution.
So fuck it, just have the vote Monday, call it a day. The little bitch Dems don’t want to participate the move on.
Isn't she the one who said during the Kavanagh confirmation, "i believe her because she's telling the truth"? In reference to the hippocampus blatantly lying accuser woman?
Tina Rutnik, installed by the governor to replace Hillary when she went to be sec state, then won a special election.....wait...who exactly is questioning who’s legitimacy?
I love how they're bitching about this, but didn't have a problem with Obama nominating one in an election year, an election he was not eligible to be re-elected, mind you. It was his Constitutional right, and it was the Senate's Constitutional right to vote "No."
They're just mad Obama didn't get his pick confirmed cause there was a Republican Senate. So they're saying that since Obama's pick didn't get confirmed, Trump doesn't get to nominate someone cause those are totally the same thing and that would only be "fair." Dems lost their chance at anything being "fair" with the shit they've pulled the last 5 years.
President doesn't stop being President when he's campaigning for re-election.
These people think "people voting=democracy." That's why they keep calling us a democracy cause they're idiots.
Yawn
And if it was the other way imagine the huge backlash.
A Rep would lose his family over it.
She has her pronouns listed in her bio.
I guess Gillibrand thinks the Constitution is illegitimate but pretty much all Democrats think that.